- Aug 21, 2016
- 15,741
- 24,895
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Oldham
Wouldn't stand up in court but a good indicative idea.
LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't stand up in court but a good indicative idea.
It's the same principle as monkeys writing Shakespeare.Just made up ****.
It's the same principle as monkeys writing Shakespeare.
If you put enough Priests with alter boys and wine the outcomes are calculable.
History proves the theory.
LOL.Yeah just as calculable as the number of racist ferals who support Collingwood.
It's a stupid and dangerous thing to post in the manner in which you have been.
LOL.
Seriously. Get a clue mate. This thread went south the minute he was found guilty.
To post the way some who are making excuses for the behaviour of the Churches (not only them) has been a disgrace to our country.
And by the way, Pell didn't commit, and couldn't have committed, the crime for which he has been found guilty.
Can and did and was judged as guilty.
Amazing how you can keep protecting that disgusting rockspider.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
He has been proven he has not only done it but protected other priests.He's incarcerated in Ararat so I'm not sure how I'm protecting him.
Maybe I'm typing this in my own cell and I'm 6'8" and run the show??
The jury got it wrong.
He couldn't have done it.
And he didn't.
One more month and we see whether the Court of Appeal has any courage to stand up to the ugly mob.
He has been proven he has not only done it but protected other priests.
He probably will get out. High society and the right protect their own.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Bull......****.
He has been found guilty, sure. But I was there and it certainly was not proven.
And it certainly has not been proven that he protected other priests. Name one.
Nah, proven and guilty. This will show wether we really have become a nation or still being held to ransom from old country cults.
He said himself he knew it was going on, we discussed this before and I provided links which you were blinded by.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
********. You hate the church. Probably because you're one of those atheist commie types.
Knowing vaguely that priests were offending? We all knew. Specific knowledge is a different thing. I know people are offending right now. Problem is I can't say who nor who the victims are. I don't know. Does that mean I have knowledge?
And I know that you know the Pell didn't do the Cathedral thing because you're already preparing the narrative. "High Society" my arse.
Nah. Just not a fan of cults and how they try to control the populous with their views while protecting those who abuse children..
Your 2nd paragraph is full of **** as always when discussing defenders of that prick.
Oh he did it. The right are up in arms defending the piece of filth.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
I believe the victims.How do you know he did it?
I believe the victims.
And with his history of turning a blind eye to pedo priests there's no "faith" in him or his character.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
There's no such history.
And "I believe the victims" is wilfully ignorant. That's how we get mob rule.
Maybe you should listen to the accusers, then listen to the accused and then you might come to some sort of grown up decision.
"I believe the victims" is kids' stuff. And leads to a disastrous outcome.
But hey.....it might get you laid.
He knows he has nothing.
There's no such history.
And "I believe the victims" is wilfully ignorant. That's how we get mob rule.
Maybe you should listen to the accusers, then listen to the accused and then you might come to some sort of grown up decision.
"I believe the victims" is kids' stuff. And leads to a disastrous outcome.
But hey.....it might get you laid.
I think the reason why it is easy to see Pell has being guilty is due to his history of supporting other known pedophiles in court and for at times being less than eager to fully support the victims. People might say but he was worried about the church's reputation, yet he was happy to support Risson in court without a worry for the church's reputation.
The best thing the catholic church can do is to oust all its pedophile priests and to fully compensation its victims, not just financially but to openly welcome them into the fold while casting out the evil doers. Not doing so is morally weak.
As I've written before, I don't think Pell was necessarily a pedo in the Risson sense but he was active in the Ballarat area at a time when many of the worst known offending occurred and from Pell's attitudes over the years and the stories told about Pell show an immature male with poor social awareness and has at least turned a blind eye to what should never have been tolerated.
Pell has been found guilty of the crime and the judge's sentence was fair and as is Pell's right there is an appeals process, at this stage I think its 50:50 as to whether it will be overturned. What people keep overlooking is that this boy withstood lengthy cross examination from one of Melbourne's finest QC's.