Peter Dutton’s racism to the bottom

Remove this Banner Ad

I dont think they even want what they are demanding, they just want to rabble rouse and get a small amount of power. scare the horses

Its Like Brexit, they got it but now decided they don't actually want it
You mean that when they bothered to lift there heads from their f****ng around with their mobiles and stopped masturbating on social media, they said "oh ho, what have we done"?
 
You mean that when they bothered to lift there heads from their f****ng around with their mobiles and stopped masturbating on social media, they said "oh ho, what have we done"?
that's why it is impossible to have a rational debate about such an emotive issue, people such as yourselves resort to hysteria insults and muddying the waters, no one mentioned color or white supremists, I cant understand why people get so defensive-Australia is (or used to be) the best country in the world to be allowed to come here is like winning lotto so it is only right that we only take people who do the right thing and contribute I couldn't care what color or what religion they are.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

LOL at Dutton trying to lay blame for his idiot governments capitulation, rather than have the in court exposure of their idiotic, flawed and illegal asylum seeker policies on Labor rather than Howard the dog who implemented the Pacific solution.
Gutless fukwit is gutless
 
Last edited:
that's why it is impossible to have a rational debate about such an emotive issue, people such as yourselves resort to hysteria insults and muddying the waters, no one mentioned color or white supremists, I cant understand why people get so defensive-Australia is (or used to be) the best country in the world to be allowed to come here is like winning lotto so it is only right that we only take people who do the right thing and contribute I couldn't care what color or what religion they are.
But that's exactly the point, the vast, vast majority of people of all colours and religions do the right thing and contribute to Australia so why do we have Bolt and co constantly attacking non Christians? Dutton is a racist and does want to be leader/Prime Minister and spreading xenophobia and fear will get him the Prime Ministership, or so he thinks.

Whilst there are people like you who say the right things like "... so it is only right that we only take people who do the right thing and contribute I couldn't care what color or what religion they are." and then go and paint everyone of a particular race and/or religion as dangerous, the real psycho and dangerous Dutton will become Prime Minister.
 
Whilst there are people like you who say the right things like "... so it is only right that we only take people who do the right thing and contribute I couldn't care what color or what religion they are." and then go and paint everyone of a particular race and/or religion as dangerous, the real psycho and dangerous Dutton will become Prime Minister.

Just out of interest, do you think that saying 'Islam has a problem with radical extremists which we need to address' paints every muslim as dangerous?
 
Just out of interest, do you think that saying 'Islam has a problem with radical extremists which we need to address' paints every muslim as dangerous?
'Islam has a problem with radical extremists which we need to address' is designed to make people wary of Islam and the followers of that faith, Muslims.

The above statement is calculated to advance the idea that somehow, Islam and Muslims need to be looked at cautiously and are not to be trusted.

The problem is not Islam, the problem is the criminals and thugs who have hijacked a religion to create fear. The terrorism being carried out is by ISIS and they are not devout Muslims, they're terrorists and they don't speak for Muslims. Muslims don't believe in slavery or beheadings, they believe in peace. Muslims don't want a ban on art or female education, on music like the ignorant thugs of ISIS want.

We need intelligent and honest leaders who tell us the truth, not statements tainted by politics, not tainted by religious affiliations nor statements designed to get votes.

ISIS do NOT represent Islam or Muslims in exactly the same way that George W Bush, Tony Blair, John Howard, "Papa Doc" & "Baby Doc"Duvalier, Reagan, Thatcher, Rudd etc etc do NOT represent Christianity or Christians. The United States of America have fomented military dictatorships in the Americas and all over the world by hijacking Christianity to fight against perceived "communist" governments and "socialistic" thinking. Hitler did the same by hijacking Christianity to commit atrocities.

We need leaders who will come out and say that it is NOT Islam that is the problem, it is NOT Christianity or Judaism that is the problem, the problem is that there are people willing to hijack religion to try and give themselves some legitimacy to commit terrorist acts. These people are not Muslims, they are terrorist criminals.

The statement, 'Islam has a problem with radical extremists which we need to address' should be, 'The world has a problem with radical extremists using Islam as a cover which we need to address'. This would immediately bring everyone into the fold who is sickened by what is happening and would marginalise and isolate those fools and warmongers who sympathise with ISIS and the like.

What we don't need nor is it helpful to have Dutton, Hanson, Bolt etc etc screaming ignorant clap trap which only divides and causes anxiety in our country because it is under those types of conditions, in conditions where people feel threatened, disrespected, denigrated, anxious that people become prey to the immoral and depraved "teachings" of criminals and that's all they are, thugs and criminals and that is not confined just to those who hide behind Islam, there are others who hide behind Christianity, the "flag" who seek to recruit the "threatened".

Statements from the 1500's by morons like Abbott about Islam having to "reform" itself, is an absolute disgrace. This man doesn't know the first thing about Islam and to show what kind of a bully and thug he is, he completely disregards what the head of his faith, Pope Francis, has been going around the world and saying since 2013! Abbott pays absolutely no heed to The Pope, his Pope and continues on his merry way demonising the people who are trying to escape the terrorism and paints them as being "closet terrorists".
 
'Islam has a problem with radical extremists which we need to address' is designed to make people wary of Islam and the followers of that faith, Muslims.

The above statement is calculated to advance the idea that somehow, Islam and Muslims need to be looked at cautiously and are not to be trusted.

The problem is not Islam, the problem is the criminals and thugs who have hijacked a religion to create fear. The terrorism being carried out is by ISIS and they are not devout Muslims, they're terrorists and they don't speak for Muslims. Muslims don't believe in slavery or beheadings, they believe in peace. Muslims don't want a ban on art or female education, on music like the ignorant thugs of ISIS want.

We need intelligent and honest leaders who tell us the truth, not statements tainted by politics, not tainted by religious affiliations nor statements designed to get votes.

ISIS do NOT represent Islam or Muslims in exactly the same way that George W Bush, Tony Blair, John Howard, "Papa Doc" & "Baby Doc"Duvalier, Reagan, Thatcher, Rudd etc etc do NOT represent Christianity or Christians. The United States of America have fomented military dictatorships in the Americas and all over the world by hijacking Christianity to fight against perceived "communist" governments and "socialistic" thinking. Hitler did the same by hijacking Christianity to commit atrocities.

We need leaders who will come out and say that it is NOT Islam that is the problem, it is NOT Christianity or Judaism that is the problem, the problem is that there are people willing to hijack religion to try and give themselves some legitimacy to commit terrorist acts. These people are not Muslims, they are terrorist criminals.

The statement, 'Islam has a problem with radical extremists which we need to address' should be, 'The world has a problem with radical extremists using Islam as a cover which we need to address'. This would immediately bring everyone into the fold who is sickened by what is happening and would marginalise and isolate those fools and warmongers who sympathise with ISIS and the like.

What we don't need nor is it helpful to have Dutton, Hanson, Bolt etc etc screaming ignorant clap trap which only divides and causes anxiety in our country because it is under those types of conditions, in conditions where people feel threatened, disrespected, denigrated, anxious that people become prey to the immoral and depraved "teachings" of criminals and that's all they are, thugs and criminals and that is not confined just to those who hide behind Islam, there are others who hide behind Christianity, the "flag" who seek to recruit the "threatened".

Statements from the 1500's by morons like Abbott about Islam having to "reform" itself, is an absolute disgrace. This man doesn't know the first thing about Islam and to show what kind of a bully and thug he is, he completely disregards what the head of his faith, Pope Francis, has been going around the world and saying since 2013! Abbott pays absolutely no heed to The Pope, his Pope and continues on his merry way demonising the people who are trying to escape the terrorism and paints them as being "closet terrorists".

Gobsmacked and speechless
 
'Islam has a problem with radical extremists which we need to address' is designed to make people wary of Islam and the followers of that faith, Muslims.

Presumably you would then disagree with me when I say that 'Catholocism has a problem with handling peadophilic priests which we need to address?'
 
Presumably you would then disagree with me when I say that 'Catholocism has a problem with handling peadophilic priests which we need to address?'
Do you really think that both of these statements should be linked?

I mean you're suggesting that the Islamic faith is directly responsible for criminals and terrorists just as you are suggesting that the Catholic Church is directly responsible for Catholic priests who are paedophiles.

I am saying that the Islamic faith has nothing to do with the terrorists and if people were to scratch beneath the surface a bit, they would see that the terrorists are being condemned every day by mainstream Muslims. When you look at the way the Catholic Church is trying to avoid the "fall out" from the depraved actions of some of their priests, then I would have to agree that the Catholic Church has a problem with handling paedophile priests but that is a matter for them to address because they are their priests. The state, that is our Governments, they are addressing this issue through our courts, in the same way that those who commit crimes/atrocities are dealt with by our courts.

For me, saying that all Muslims are terrorists is just as sickening as saying that all Catholic priests are paedophiles.

Islam is not responsible for the terrorism. The Koran, the Bible and the Torah are, in the main, no worse or better than each other. All of those good books preach peace and good will to mankind. Just because some lunatics hold up one of these books and say, "we are doing it for (enter faith here)", doesn't mean that these psychopaths represent that religion.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Do you really think that both of these statements should be linked?

I mean you're suggesting that the Islamic faith is directly responsible for criminals and terrorists just as you are suggesting that the Catholic Church is directly responsible for Catholic priests who are paedophiles.

So your issue is that with the Catholic church's case, its institutional?
 
Want to go passage for passage New Testament vs the Koran?

Christianity moved on from the violence of the Old Testament. Islam would be very happy if it were still 700 AD.
Yeah. The crusades proved how much the Christians had moved on from the Old testament and whilst the Christian mercenaries went around destroying anything, everyone and everything in sight, the Muslims invaded joints, as you did in those days and they marvelled at the beauty of the architecture, the arts, the writings of these conquered peoples and did their share of killing, maiming and raping, as you did in those days but they also carried on the tradition of the Byzantines in studying and learning from these people whereas the Christians, who had moved on from the Old Testament, went out and hired mercenaries to loot and plunder and kill and burn and leave nothing but ashes; no trace of any civilisation.

This ISIS mob of psychopaths think that it's the 7th century, exactly the same as the Born Again/Fundamentalist numbskulls think that it's the beginning of Christianity and the Jewish extremists who dream of a Jewish Monarchy. The point being that the world has moved on immeasurably since those times but there are those who trot out the same archaic and barbaric views in order to attain power, status and usually wealth. They are called psychopaths and the religions they invoke are irrelevant.

This bullshit game of "I'll see your passage and raise you this one" is for the unsophisticated minds of those who cannot grasp even the most rudimentary of concepts.
 
So your issue is that with the Catholic church's case, its institutional?
The institution of the Catholic Church is a vast, bureaucratic entity where there are, as with all vast bureaucracies, the inherent dangers of individuals building their own little empires and what may start as a perfectly reasonable and just directive from the top, as with this brilliant Pope Francis, it doesn't seem to permeate down to those "at the coal face" so to speak so yes, there is a failure of the institution to deal with and punish paedophiles but paedophilia is not a result of being a Catholic Priest nor is being part of the Catholic faith predisposing you to possibly being a paedophile. Does that make sense?
 
Yeah. The crusades

Your response involves Christianity many hundreds of years ago. Thanks for proving my point. Because I can point to yesterday with Islam. And the day before. And the day before. And the day before. And about 12,000 other terrorist attacks over the last 10 or 15 years.

All lone wolves, BTW.
 
Your response involves Christianity many hundreds of years ago. Thanks for proving my point. Because I can point to yesterday with Islam. And the day before. And the day before. And the day before. And about 12,000 other terrorist attacks over the last 10 or 15 years.

All lone wolves, BTW.
Don't you get it? Islam has nothing to do with ISIS other than that mob of psychopaths hiding behind the facade that they are Muslims: they are not Muslims, they are terrorists.

George W Bush, Tony Blair and their lap dog John Howard used the manufactured ogre of Islam to attack Iraq, the regime of which had absolutely nothing to do with the atrocities on September the eleventh and Bush invoked the God card, Christianity, as their protector! The USA invaded Vietnam so as to protect itself and "humanity" from the anti-Christian communists. Christians in the Ukraine burnt teachers alive in buildings because they were "subversives". God fearing Christians in the United States of America commit outrages every day in the name of Christ. These people do not represent Christianity. ISIS do not represent Islam. The perpetrators are criminals, nothing more nor anything less.

Islam nor Christianity are responsible for lunatics, for psychopaths.
 
Don't you get it? Islam has nothing to do with ISIS other than that mob of psychopaths hiding behind the facade that they are Muslims: they are not Muslims, they are terrorists.

Yet a sizeable percentage of Muslims agree with what ISIS are doing. Agree with what the thousands of lone wolves are doing. Agree that we should return to the stone age, where women are chattel and gays are put to the sword.

This is not some freakshow Westboro Baptist Church with 30 members who make a lot of noise. It is thousands of people with millions nodding in agreement.
 
Yet a sizeable percentage of Muslims agree with what ISIS are doing. Agree with what the thousands of lone wolves are doing. Agree that we should return to the stone age, where women are chattel and gays are put to the sword.

This is not some freakshow Westboro Baptist Church with 30 members who make a lot of noise. It is thousands of people with millions nodding in agreement.
Where the f**k do you come up with "Yet a sizeable percentage of Muslims agree with what ISIS are doing". You and people like you that come up with these reprehensible statements based on nothing more than ignorance at best, bigotry in reality, are the reason that criminals like ISIS exists and won't be going anywhere soon. F**kwits like Hanson, Dutton and ignoramuses like you are ISIS's best friends! By pointing fingers at people who are as peaceful as you and me and calling them terrorists because they happen to be of the Muslim faith can drive the the impressionable youth straight into the arms of the devils and why, because you are behaving exactly like the sociopaths say that we, the non-muslims, behave, that is, with complete disrespect and disregard for those of the Islamic faith.

You and Hanson and Bolt and the rest of your minority and that's what you are, a f***ing minority with loudspeakers, you do not represent me nor the vast majority of our peaceful, migrant nation and we are all f****ng migrants or descendants of, you do not represent us but what you do, is cause unrest and fear and anxiety within our nation that can have devastating consequences.

ISIS and other criminal organisations rely on people like you HairyO.
 
Yet a sizeable percentage of Muslims agree with what ISIS are doing. Agree with what the thousands of lone wolves are doing. Agree that we should return to the stone age, where women are chattel and gays are put to the sword.

This is not some freakshow Westboro Baptist Church with 30 members who make a lot of noise. It is thousands of people with millions nodding in agreement.

100,000 British Muslims sympathise with suicide bombers

only one in three British Muslims (34%) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists

up to 1,000 British Muslims have joined ISIS, which is more than joined the Army reserves.

36% have thought apostates should be killed ( leaving Islam)

Besides that over 50% of British Muslim men and a whopping 75% of British Muslim Women of working age are unemployed

Millions of people sitting around all day doing whatever they do, but just guessing they do SFA is not going to end well, that is millions of people in the UK alone.
 
The real reason why Tony Burke opposes increasing the English testing skills of migrants.

His doesn't want to upset his electorate which includes Lakemba and surrounding suburbs.

Gutless appeaser.

Is it a stretch if the next terrorist comes from his electorate he is partly responsible ?

http://www.2gb.com/podcast/mark-latham-12/
 
100,000 British Muslims sympathise with suicide bombers

only one in three British Muslims (34%) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists

up to 1,000 British Muslims have joined ISIS, which is more than joined the Army reserves.

36% have thought apostates should be killed ( leaving Islam)

Besides that over 50% of British Muslim men and a whopping 75% of British Muslim Women of working age are unemployed

Millions of people sitting around all day doing whatever they do, but just guessing they do SFA is not going to end well, that is millions of people in the UK alone.
Got a reference for that? Or is this something you 'just know'?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top