Peter Dutton’s racism to the bottom

Remove this Banner Ad

What are they then?
Terrorists are just terrorist *silly people deserving of no state support or nationality. Also have universally small penises and are sexually impotent(even the "chicks")

That's once you act as a terrorist though, you can't tar all descendants of Lebanese or whatever group indiscriminately.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Would multiculturalism be a value?

Would singling out an entire section if the community mean your againsy australia and thus. A snake in the grasa?
Liberals have been anti multiculturalism since john Howard though, so it is consistent with party attitudes to divide and single out.
 
think you are a bit off track with the whitey bashing,psyco murdering cowards come in all shapes sizes and colors but people who commit terrorist acts in the name of islam come in only one select group. also peter Dutton (remember him-the guy this forum was originally about?) who everyone critisesed-turns out countries taking in refugees are seeking advice from young Pete.
Now I know not Australia, but was not the unabomber from the USA a white guy (Christian I think) and there's a few there like Waco with non Islamic basis.
 
Big mystery...who has kidnapped the real Dutton?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/lifesty...t/news-story/d646d1aa56dd8be4ee3e154b92925d8f

IMMIGRATION Minister Peter Dutton has given his approval of the controversial billboard featuring two young Muslim girls wearing hijabs.
In an interview with 3AW, Mr Dutton described the billboard as “great”, saying Australians should not be offended by the hijab or headscarf if they see it in public.
“I think it’s great that we’ve got young boys, young girls from whatever background who are embracing Australian values, flying the Australian flag, proud to be Australian, proud to be part of our society, want to be part of a peaceful future in this country,” Mr Dutton said.

“They’re all the values that all of us embrace.”

“People have different elements to their dress and their culture that they embrace,” he said.
 
Terrorists are just terrorist ****silly people deserving of no state support or nationality. Also have universally small penises and are sexually impotent(even the "chicks")

That's once you act as a terrorist though, you can't tar all descendants of Lebanese or whatever group indiscriminately.

So that's why they're intent on all the posthumous virgins - a virgin wouldn't have a penis history to compare the incoming pin-dicks against!
 
Martin 'Port Arthur Massacre guy' Bryant was white.

OMG. BAN WHITEY.

John 'Granny Killer' Glover was white.

OMG. BAN WHITEY.

Julian 'Hoddle Street massacre guy' Knight was white.

OMG. BAN WHITEY.

Ivan 'backpacker killer' Milat was white.

OMG. BAN WHITEY.

John 'Snowtown Killer' Bunting, Robert 'Snowtown Killer' Wagner, James 'Snowtown Killer' Vlassakis, and Mark 'Snowtown Killer' Haydon were all white.

ZOMG!! BAN WHITEY.

This thing gets ridiculous after a while. There are individuals who become murderers, plain and simple. Born with a lack of empathy, a narcissistic streak and some other deep-seated psychological issues, these tendencies are not bound by race. They are anomalies within our society, who eventually out themselves in the most horrific of ways.

By all means, go after the transgressing individual and those who seek to spread a wider hatred. But to collectively punish an entire ethnic group for the douchebaggery of a subset?

It's a negative and reactive stupidity, that's what it is at best.
Simply maths exposes the reality.
A. How many Muslim immigrants in Aus since it;s discovery?
B. How many have been even vaguely linked to terrorist acts?
What percentage of A is B?

Dutton is a self serving kant/. Period
 
Big mystery...who has kidnapped the real Dutton?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/lifesty...t/news-story/d646d1aa56dd8be4ee3e154b92925d8f

IMMIGRATION Minister Peter Dutton has given his approval of the controversial billboard featuring two young Muslim girls wearing hijabs.
In an interview with 3AW, Mr Dutton described the billboard as “great”, saying Australians should not be offended by the hijab or headscarf if they see it in public.
“I think it’s great that we’ve got young boys, young girls from whatever background who are embracing Australian values, flying the Australian flag, proud to be Australian, proud to be part of our society, want to be part of a peaceful future in this country,” Mr Dutton said.

“They’re all the values that all of us embrace.”

“People have different elements to their dress and their culture that they embrace,” he said.

Good on him! It's a positive step forward, at least. I just hope he doesn't get branded a 'race traitor' now by the likes of the United Patriots Front (the group that whinged about the billboard in the first place).
 
Liberals have been anti multiculturalism since john Howard though, so it is consistent with party attitudes to divide and single out.
Big mystery...who has kidnapped the real Dutton?

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/lifesty...t/news-story/d646d1aa56dd8be4ee3e154b92925d8f

IMMIGRATION Minister Peter Dutton has given his approval of the controversial billboard featuring two young Muslim girls wearing hijabs.
In an interview with 3AW, Mr Dutton described the billboard as “great”, saying Australians should not be offended by the hijab or headscarf if they see it in public.
“I think it’s great that we’ve got young boys, young girls from whatever background who are embracing Australian values, flying the Australian flag, proud to be Australian, proud to be part of our society, want to be part of a peaceful future in this country,” Mr Dutton said.

“They’re all the values that all of us embrace.”

“People have different elements to their dress and their culture that they embrace,” he said.
There is a big difference between being anti-multiculturalism and just opening the flood gates. That is how the Liberals operate and the Left carry on like it is vagrant discrimination.
 
There is a big difference between being anti-multiculturalism and just opening the flood gates. That is how the Liberals operate and the Left carry on like it is vagrant discrimination.
You have no idea what you are talking about, best let it go.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

There is a big difference between being anti-multiculturalism and just opening the flood gates. That is how the Liberals operate and the Left carry on like it is vagrant discrimination.
Your strawman confuses me.

My response was to a question about whether dividing out and singling out a group/ race is counter to multicultural policy. My response just points out that liberal party does not care for multiculturalism since john Howard.
Nowhere did I say throw open the floodgates.

And I'm unsure what you are claiming that the liberals do. From what I see all politicians specialise in doing * all apart from larceny writ large.
 
Your strawman confuses me.

My response was to a question about whether dividing out and singling out a group/ race is counter to multicultural policy. My response just points out that liberal party does not care for multiculturalism since john Howard.
Nowhere did I say throw open the floodgates.

And I'm unsure what you are claiming that the liberals do. From what I see all politicians specialise in doing **** all apart from larceny writ large.
All Howard did was stop the dam from bursting. Immigration to Australia didn't suddenly stop like you believe.
 
All Howard did was stop the dam from bursting. Immigration to Australia didn't suddenly stop like you believe.
Not the point I was making. The point was Howard was against multiculturalism and wanted immigrants to assimilate into the dominant culture. Not that he wanted to stop immigration (that was Mrs Spencer and her Australians against further immigration fringe party in the early 90s). Incidentally her son would often call me "gook" at school. Suppose he'd say anything to distract from how fugly he was (definitely overshadowed by younger brother Jesse who was cast member in House)
 
I'm a Dick Smith kind bloke myself. Stop all immigration full stop. The so called "economic" benefit of ever increasing population is a Ponzi scheme benefiting only big vested interests comes at the significant cost to living standards, social cohesion and most importantly our environment.

Is there an 'ideal target population' for Australia? How would we next restrict growth once that target is reached?
 
Is there an 'ideal target population' for Australia? How would we next restrict growth once that target is reached?

Remove the dependent who provide no income or value... They will start with the bed bound demented and work from there...
 
Not the point I was making. The point was Howard was against multiculturalism and wanted immigrants to assimilate into the dominant culture. Not that he wanted to stop immigration (that was Mrs Spencer and her Australians against further immigration fringe party in the early 90s). Incidentally her son would often call me "gook" at school. Suppose he'd say anything to distract from how fugly he was (definitely overshadowed by younger brother Jesse who was cast member in House)
The problem I have with those who oppose multiculturalism is that the goal posts constantly move, first it was Italians, and Greeks that we were meant to fear, then the Asians, now it's the Muslims that are destroying our way of life. All they really promote is an unreasonable fear of the "other".
 
The problem I have with those who oppose multiculturalism is that the goal posts constantly move, first it was Italians, and Greeks that we were meant to fear, then the Asians, now it's the Muslims that are destroying our way of life. All they really promote is an unreasonable fear of the "other".
I remember for Howard it was Asians, and not being part of the "main" culture keeping to their own "enclaves". Fast forward a generation and the kids mix. Same will happen organically as long as they feel "welcome" - and I don't mean roll over and adopt (in this example) Asian values, just don't have mainstream media and government saying "Asians get lost, you're all sneaky shits who work too hard and take our jobs" (continuing example)
 
Is there an 'ideal target population' for Australia? How would we next restrict growth once that target is reached?

25 million and that's it. If you really care about the environment, climate change and the housing affordability you should jump on board.
At the rate of 2% - our population exponentially doubles every 35 years.

http://dicksmithpopulation.com/
https://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/01/dick-smith-the-people-have-spoken-halt-population-growth/
http://www.smh.com.au/national/aust...ion-faster-than-expected-20160211-gms2pe.html

posted earlier in another thread by evo
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top