evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
And the lulz roll on.
"Chan, we are going to need more dumplings"
"Chan, we are going to need more dumplings"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Overturned or set aside only twice.
6 were sent back to CAS for further consideration.
I wonder how the bulldogs board feels about Gordon going out and acting like a dickhead.
I'm certainly not enjoying it, and just wish he would leave it to the players to make statements
Fitting that we can all celebrate with dumplings just as Lunar NY approaches!And the lulz roll on.
"Chan, we are going to need more dumplings"
anyone else getting a hilarious image of Dank turning up at the appeal verdict?
anyone else getting a hilarious image of Dank turning up at the appeal verdict?
His passport is damaged with spilled bad thymoanyone else getting a hilarious image of Dank turning up at the appeal verdict?
1... 2... doesn't really matter, it is not a good hit/miss record and neither case was about a WADA appeal. I still wouldn't put any money on this being overturned.
oh wow, a law student. You have to be kidding, lolAs someone who has studied law in Switzerland at a master's level I can safely say: these campaigners are stuffed.
As someone who has studied law in Switzerland at a master's level I can safely say: these campaigners are stuffed.
Yep.anyone else getting a hilarious image of Dank turning up at the appeal verdict?
One of the truly disappointing aspects of this Saga - is that that dude didn't get more air time.Could be a reunion of sorts. Get the band back together, etc
Would this bloke get a passport?
View attachment 212745
No. Graduate from Switzerland. Suck it up princess. You're ****ed. Throwing good money after bad.oh wow, a law student. You have to be kidding, lol
Gordon said the players had initially fallen under the 2010 AFL anti-doping code, which stipulated that rulings could only be appealed if the decision involved legal error or gross unreasonableness. But he said the upgraded AFL anti-doping code unveiled in January last year – when the case before the AFL anti-doping tribunal was underway – allowed CAS to pursue the entire case again.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...as-verdict-20160204-gmm8fb.html#ixzz3zHImc83m
Didn't Bruce Francis say this ?
Didn't Peter Gordon save Footscray, the underdog, from oblivion and extinction, i think he knows when people have been badly treated, there is no doubt the Essendon players have been, didn't Peter Gordon donate 1 million to the Dogs.
The man is a decent football man and a decent human, i think he knows when people have been shafted, CAS sure shafted Essendon, they even took 30,00o Swiss $$ home with them, the amount they fined the AFL and the players.
I wonder if they hid the money in a Swiss bank.
This "decent lawyer" is trying to argue that de novo doesn't apply and CAS has no jurisdiction. I would never hire such a buffoon.As i said he is a decent person and a decent lawyer.
No. Graduate from Switzerland. Suck it up princess. You're stuffed. Throwing good money after bad.
fixed.Oh god lord. Here we go again. Another fantastic year or so on the HTB. Hoorah!
I am just pretending that this is some kind of double bluffThis "decent lawyer" is trying to argue that de novo doesn't apply and CAS has no jurisdiction. I would never hire such a buffoon.
Players are about as innocent as you are a Collingwood supporter.Your fancy lawyer talk baffles me, please explain ?.
Even if you think you are innocent and for all we know you may be, we will crush you, nice one manboob