Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
was that ever w thing? they did recruit morton, hanneberry, mumford, hall and rohan. and im sure more, ronke looks like a knobSo much for the Swans no DH policy
stupid demands considering they kicked him out the door. any port fan who thought thats what theyd get is a lunaticFirst rounder or he stays.
The lesson here is, don’t believe anything your club says during the trade period. It’s just posturing and taking it literally only sets you up for disappointment.
Pushovers? You literally got Allir who was an AA defender this year for Pick 31 last year. You've barely ever had to pay full price for any of your incoming players, and have got top price for outgoing players.
You did get reamed on this deal though
Yes. He got quite a few this year ahead of Hayes.Port have Lycett, Hayes, Dixon, Marshall, Georgiadis.
Is Ladhams even getting a game?
He played 17 games this year.Port have Lycett, Hayes, Dixon, Marshall, Georgiadis.
Is Ladhams even getting a game?
Yep despite a couple of Port fans being in denial all trade period they clearly shopped him and pushed him out. This has been a lesson in how not to trade.It's what happens when you tell a contracted player to look elsewhere. Guaranteed to tank their value
But Georgiadis and Hayes could go past him.He played 17 games this year.
Georgiades isn’t a ruck.But Georgiadis and Hayes could go past him.
McEvoy - 1st and a player (savage)
Ryder - 1st and a 2nd
Clark - pick 12
longer - pick 25
hickey - pick 13
renouf - 33
Mumford - 28
Ladhams is contracted and only 23. He’s shown near to or more than a lot of those players had at the same age.
rucks have only become more scarce and more necessary since a lot of those trades.
You’re still in denial. You’ve believed the club PR all trade period about holding out for a first and being happy to keep him. It’s blatantly obvious Port wanted Ladhams out and were always going to trade him for whatever they could get. They were never going to keep him despite what they said publicly.Ports always been upfront and don’t lie though..
they’ve just been pushovers at the trade table and that yet again led them to getting pushed over. Surprise.
Well your own list manager was happy to see Ladhams go.Georgiades isn’t a ruck.
And Ladhams played 17 games this year versus Hayes 0.
Hayes could well overtake him, but that might take some time as Hayes is younger and coming back from a aclZ
you seem to have less than zero idea of our list and players so I’m unsure why you’re making statements.
For all the bitching about the Crows being infair....
Port have just bent Sydney over 2 years in a row.
Can you please explain how or are you being sarcastic?
Port have Lycett, Hayes, Dixon, Marshall, Georgiadis.
Is Ladhams even getting a game?
They got what he was worth.. he was never worth anywhere near a first rounder on its own.They just gave Ladhams away in the end. Surely that's not the best that they could have got.
Does he walk into the Swans side? Im not sure he does.