Traded Peter Ladhams and #16 traded to Sydney for #12 and F3

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

First rounder or he stays.

The lesson here is, don’t believe anything your club says during the trade period. It’s just posturing and taking it literally only sets you up for disappointment.
stupid demands considering they kicked him out the door. any port fan who thought thats what theyd get is a lunatic
 
Pushovers? You literally got Allir who was an AA defender this year for Pick 31 last year. You've barely ever had to pay full price for any of your incoming players, and have got top price for outgoing players.

You did get reamed on this deal though

we didn’t get that cause we strong armed Sydney

Sydney had cap problems and had to let him go.
 
But Georgiadis and Hayes could go past him.
Georgiades isn’t a ruck.
And Ladhams played 17 games this year versus Hayes 0.
Hayes could well overtake him, but that might take some time as Hayes is younger and coming back from a aclZ

you seem to have less than zero idea of our list and players so I’m unsure why you’re making statements.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

McEvoy - 1st and a player (savage)

Ryder - 1st and a 2nd

Clark - pick 12

longer - pick 25

hickey - pick 13

renouf - 33

Mumford - 28

Ladhams is contracted and only 23. He’s shown near to or more than a lot of those players had at the same age.

rucks have only become more scarce and more necessary since a lot of those trades.

Any thoughts on why this didn't happen?
 
Ports always been upfront and don’t lie though..
they’ve just been pushovers at the trade table and that yet again led them to getting pushed over. Surprise.
You’re still in denial. You’ve believed the club PR all trade period about holding out for a first and being happy to keep him. It’s blatantly obvious Port wanted Ladhams out and were always going to trade him for whatever they could get. They were never going to keep him despite what they said publicly.
 
Georgiades isn’t a ruck.
And Ladhams played 17 games this year versus Hayes 0.
Hayes could well overtake him, but that might take some time as Hayes is younger and coming back from a aclZ

you seem to have less than zero idea of our list and players so I’m unsure why you’re making statements.
Well your own list manager was happy to see Ladhams go.

And Ladhams spent a lot of time fwd. Hence he is competing with Marshall and Georgiadis to some extent.

It's obvious your club rates Hayes.
 
They just gave Ladhams away in the end. Surely that's not the best that they could have got.
They got what he was worth.. he was never worth anywhere near a first rounder on its own.

and, more importantly for them, they freed up a list spot and $400k in the salary cap… one of their past greats in Tredrea alluded today on AA that port have some salary cap issues.. if true, and you’d think he’d get some decent intel… this helps them.
 
Seems a decent deal for the swans.. getting pick 16 as well. Unless I’m missing something… just not sure the swans needed him. Where’s mcdonald and McLean gonna fit in?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top