Remove this Banner Ad

Pick #2

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Trengrove for me.

Taking big men high in the draft is risky, lets not forget the Molan debacle, and just look at Josh Fraser. But if BP decides he is worth the risk i'll accept that, but damn we will be kicking ourseleves if we pass up a Simon Black type for a guy with only potential.

And if we take trengrove and he does decide to leave, in theory we should be compensated.

Maybe not. This is because if Crows or Port finish top 4, their pick will be around mid 15's. This pick range is not enough for Trengrove and I think MFC want atleast a top 10 pick.

If MFC fails to work out a deal, look at Nick Stevens situation please :(

Will you be pissed? I'm sure everyone will be :(

Butcher will be a safer option as always comparing to Trengrove.
 
Trengove may very well be the second best player in the draft, and for what it’s worth I am actually sold on him. He is getting it done in the SAFL seniors.

BUT Melbourne will take Butcher.

I think that the club will take the opportunity now to assure our KPP stocks. Elite KPP’s very very rarely go outside the top 5 where as elite mids are often had anywhere in the top 10. Given the club will not be planning on finish outside the top 10 for the next decade they will take Butcher knowing that we get Scully anyway.

Butcher is averaging 3.33 goals (@ 66.7% accuracy) a game in the TAC against 2 opponents whilst carrying an injury (he’s kicked 9 in his last 2 outings) and he takes big pack marks. That’s not too bad… Added to this his undoubted form last year as a bottom age player where he was the 2nd best KPF behind, the messiah.

Drafting Butcher this would mean that we have the two best key position forwards in their age range. Not too bad when you add a couple of 20 yo; Liam J, Austin Wonna. Added to that a very versatile Mathew Bate, and IMO the best set shot for goal Brad Green whom could play well into his 30’s re: Brad Johnston but as our 6th best forward.

Davey was on track early this year for AA honors, but struggled to break the number one tag. Scully will fix that. Grimes already has champion written all over him, Morton could do anything, Sylvia is looking more and more like a Gary Ablett Jnr clone, Jones is looks far more composed once he has some more quality around him. Mclean and Beamer are tough hard at it types, and we haven’t even seen what Blease and Strauss can do, not to mention a Bastinac or Gysberts type at pick 18 this year.

Mid options:
1. Scully - Both
2. Grimes - Both
3. Sylvia - Both
4. Davey - Outside
5. Morton - Outside
6. Maric - Outside
7. Blease - Outside
8. Strauss - Outside
9. McLean - Inside
10. Moloney - Inside
11. Jones – Inside
12. Valenti - Inside
13. Bastinac/Gysberts (Pick 18)

Pick the best 8 from that list and the 5 others are running around with Casey. IMO I cannot see any way we could fit all of: Jones, Beamer and McLean into our best 22. Rewind 12 months and that was an outrageous statement.

Whereas the forward line heavens forbid Watts was cut down circa David Schwartz our structure is looking way to much like the Western Bulldogs (on offence) we have no other seriously dangerous KPF options. With Scully our midfield will already be looking unstoppable and so deep Trengove would almost be over kill. We lack forward line depth.

I agree :thumbsu:

Look at the list of midfielders: Too many midfielders will result headaches for the selectors.

Simply because there will be no room to squeeze all quality midfielders in the best 22 unless AFL introduce 6 or 8 players on the bench rather than 4.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I rkn we should look at Delidio for pick .

Hey you settle down. ;)

I think the Dee's should take Butch. I've seen him play a bit over his two years at Gippy and he's a real talent. I think he would compliment Watts as they are different players. Watts seems to be a leading forward with alot of skill for a big man. Butcher is your Kosi type, can take a big mark but also has great hands on the lead.

His kicking deficiencies are overstated. He's been playing injured in 09 and has managed to kick 30.15 in 9 games. That's with a high of 6, so he has been consistently kicking goals. That's pretty darn good last time I checked.

A forward line containing Butcher, Watts and Jurrah seems to good to pass up IMO.
 
it's impossible to ignore Tregoves SANFL form...but it's impossible to ignore Butchers TAC form

I started the year in the Butcher camp, but changed to Trengove in the lead up to the carnival. but suddenly find myself wanting Butcher again.

haha I'm exactly the same. I've heard that Butch has carried a few injures through this year. Maybe this Is why he didn't have a great carnival. We haven't seen Blease or Strauss yet and obviously we have Scully to come, I also think Grimes will move into the midfield next year. We can pick another mid at 18 so I'm on the Butcher wagon again. I'm drooling at the thought of building a forward line around Watts, Butcher and Jurrah.
 
I agree :thumbsu:

Look at the list of midfielders: Too many midfielders will result headaches for the selectors.

Simply because there will be no room to squeeze all quality midfielders in the best 22 unless AFL introduce 6 or 8 players on the bench rather than 4.

How many times during the year do we have our best 22 available?

It's called depth and every good team has it.
 
Hey, i know Hutchy said it is going to happen but has anyone thought about taking Trengove and Butcher?

We are hearing all these awesome things about Trengove and was Carnival MVP, is playing with men already so is liekly someone who can come in and make a contribution straight off. It is funny with all the debate there has never been much debate about this.

Would nearly be worth taking Trengove to watch Hutchy have to admit he was wrong.

Stinga on that depth argument don't we need to also add depth to the forward line??

Thing against Butcher is I think Bail's suggested that Garland would come back as a forward next year.

I love the fact that we have choices and hopefully we nail this decision and we get a buddy and not a Tambling
 
Hey, i know Hutchy said it is going to happen but has anyone thought about taking Trengove and Butcher?

We are hearing all these awesome things about Trengove and was Carnival MVP, is playing with men already so is liekly someone who can come in and make a contribution straight off. It is funny with all the debate there has never been much debate about this.

Would nearly be worth taking Trengove to watch Hutchy have to admit he was wrong.

Stinga on that depth argument don't we need to also add depth to the forward line??

Thing against Butcher is I think Bail's suggested that Garland would come back as a forward next year.

I love the fact that we have choices and hopefully we nail this decision and we get a buddy and not a Tambling

Very true, I honestly have no idea who to pick and there's good arguments both ways. But there's also stupid arguments as well (hence my comment above). It's going to be tough, but either way we'll get a good one.

I was leaning towards Trengove, but I wasn't super impressed with his carnival video, but also haven't seen much of Butcher. I'm pretty happy with how our midfield is developing, so perhaps Butcher is the one...
 
How many times during the year do we have our best 22 available?

It's called depth and every good team has it.

Wow, the use of logic on this topic! A rare contribution.

I dont get how people can not include room for; form, injury, suspension, etc etc.. When listing all the likely options. And multiple people for a position can cause friendly competition amongst a squad. I.e. Luke Ball not in best 22.

Hey, i know Hutchy said it is going to happen but has anyone thought about taking Trengove and Butcher?

We are hearing all these awesome things about Trengove and was Carnival MVP, is playing with men already so is liekly someone who can come in and make a contribution straight off. It is funny with all the debate there has never been much debate about this.

Would nearly be worth taking Trengove to watch Hutchy have to admit he was wrong.

Stinga on that depth argument don't we need to also add depth to the forward line??

Thing against Butcher is I think Bail's suggested that Garland would come back as a forward next year.

I love the fact that we have choices and hopefully we nail this decision and we get a buddy and not a Tambling

I know that first paragraph is 'tongue in cheek' but if it isn't may God have mercy on your soul.

Secondly on the seniors argument, refer to my post on page 3.

Thirdly Bailey said it is a possibility of playing Garland forward some games, not a full time forward.
 
Nup definately not "tongue in cheek" it was a straiight out question. A month or so again Shifter said that Trengove was closing the gap, and since then has had BOG's in SANFL seniors.

Yeah i know I read you bit on page three and thought it was a bit far fetched to suggest that the players in the SANFL had nothing better to do then run around shielding a player to help him get drafted. I would suggest that any under 18 team was going to struggle against a SANFL WAFL or VFL side. I find it impressive that with an imature body he is able to mix it with the big kids.

Also if this was right why did the MFC media talk about a=what a big step Watts had to make to get up to speed in the VFL seniors?
 
Hey, i know Hutchy said it is going to happen but has anyone thought about taking Trengove and Butcher?

The simple concept of Melbourne overlooking Scully sounds so baffling. If it actually happened, Richmond would be laughing to death. Scully is the most complete player in the draft and while his leadership and kicking isn't as good as Trengove's, he's pretty much better in all other catagories.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah i know it sounds baffling, and i haven't said i think we should i just think it would be worth looking at.

Also GrandBlue I rate those qualities pretty highly in the whole scheme of things
 
Hey, i know Hutchy said it is going to happen but has anyone thought about taking Trengove and Butcher?

facepalm.jpg
 
Nup definately not "tongue in cheek" it was a straiight out question. A month or so again Shifter said that Trengove was closing the gap, and since then has had BOG's in SANFL seniors.

Yeah i know I read you bit on page three and thought it was a bit far fetched to suggest that the players in the SANFL had nothing better to do then run around shielding a player to help him get drafted. I would suggest that any under 18 team was going to struggle against a SANFL WAFL or VFL side. I find it impressive that with an imature body he is able to mix it with the big kids.

Also if this was right why did the MFC media talk about a=what a big step Watts had to make to get up to speed in the VFL seniors?

Well may god have mercy on your soul, if all you have to do if go around in an attempt to annoy a media personality.

Also if you did read my post and played the game you may actually realize that sought of team work blocks and such if better at higher levels. And it does actually happen aswell that teams do their best to get a player drafted as that benefits the club as well as the individual.

I have no doubt a senior side from those leagues would beat a U/18 team. No doubt. I never suggested such a thing, i noted that the TAC is the leading competition to be drafted from.

Additionaly, those leagues are semi-professional not professional , so calling them big kids is a bit strange. Yet older players would look out for the younger guy. His stats dont mean a thing where and how he gets it is more important. Just see Joel Bowden as a prime example.

Furthermore, Watts played 4 TAC cup games last year and a number for his school. He was drafted as a 17, and with ludicrous comments such as your you should go join the WCE posters on bay 13.
 
Thanks for setting me straight. Lesson learned and glad the great messiah has spoken to me through you.

Hate to see you angry, and all i originally asked was if anybody had thought about the prospect?

Have you also taken into account that 90% of AFL media is based in Victoria, making it easy to throw everything at Scully and we see so much more of him. There was a feeling last year that if Nic Nat and Rich were victorian they would have been held in a higher light.

I am sorry i believed this question was worth asking. Also i think you'll find Watts also played something called the Interstate carnival where a lot of his hype came from!

Dont go off half cocked just because someone is putting out a different point of view.

This could be like the people asking for Sylvia to be delisted........
or
Those angry supporter who thought we should of held onto Travis Johnstone

Not everything is as black and white as you see it!
 
I'd be very happy to have Butcher at the MFC, but not at pick 2. There are too many queries about Butcher for him to be a pick 2 draftee. His workrate is poor, his field kicking is very poor and his goal kicking spasmodic.

Happy to draft him, but he's not a pick 2.

And those that peddle the hackneyed groupthink on Morabito's kicking have probably never seen him play. He'll be a very very good AFL footballer. The queries on his kicking are very overstated.
 
Also GrandBlue I rate those qualities pretty highly in the whole scheme of things

Then you'll be very happy with Scully. He was Vic Metro captain for a reason and has leadership written all over him. Three months ago a prominent player manager - who doesn't manage Scully - told me that Scully will captain the MFC if we're able to draft him. Pretty high praise and reflective of his leadership capabilities.

Also, Scully is a very good kick. He's not (yet) an elite kick, but he's still good.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nup definately not "tongue in cheek" it was a straiight out question. A month or so again Shifter said that Trengove was closing the gap, and since then has had BOG's in SANFL seniors.

Yeah i know I read you bit on page three and thought it was a bit far fetched to suggest that the players in the SANFL had nothing better to do then run around shielding a player to help him get drafted. I would suggest that any under 18 team was going to struggle against a SANFL WAFL or VFL side. I find it impressive that with an imature body he is able to mix it with the big kids.

Also if this was right why did the MFC media talk about a=what a big step Watts had to make to get up to speed in the VFL seniors?

Thanks for setting me straight. Lesson learned and glad the great messiah has spoken to me through you.

Hate to see you angry, and all i originally asked was if anybody had thought about the prospect?

Have you also taken into account that 90% of AFL media is based in Victoria, making it easy to throw everything at Scully and wesee so much more of him. There was a feeling last year that if Nic Nat and Rich were victorian they would have been held in a higher light.

I am sorry i believed this question was worth asking. Also i think you'll find Watts also played something called the Interstate carnival where a lot of his hype came from!

Dont go off half cocked just because someone is putting out a different point of view.

This could be like the people asking for Sylvia to be delisted........
or
Those angry supporter who thought we should of held onto Travis Johnstone

Not everything is as black and white as you see it!


Who is angry? I am sitting hear drinking a cold milo? I suggest you have one too if you are feeling angry or stressed...You seem to be...I never attacked you just your argument, there is a big difference.

Under 18 Championships? Larke medalist? I had no idea, you see i live under a rock.

Also i look at more than just Victorian articles. I make my own decision.

I see things red and blue (and when away i see them in white, red & blue), not black and white. You seem to have trouble deciphering meaning from it all.

Back on the main debate... My point originally was that you can not compare performances in different leagues as there is too many variables, including (but not limited to) those mentioned. The recruiters will make the decision nobody on here will, and they will naturally take into account all these varibles rather than say he is performing at a league which is perceived to be higher standard.
 
Thanks Trav

Looks like were starting to get some serious leadership caperbilities, with Grimes Beamer Watts Mclean and to add Scully to that list. Might be a good move to give Jnr another year to see who puts the best claim on the job for the future
 
Nah not stressed at all mate, having a laugh about all this. I think you summed it up beautifully in your last paragraph and actually argued both our points.

We don't know who they are going to pick, lets just hope its the best pick, whether thats any combination of Scully, Trengove, Butcher, morobito etc

I laughed when i read the Red and Blue bit as i had thiat in there but took it out.
 
Newton. Juice Newton.

Opps. I forgot.:confused:

Maybe we could pass on P18 and just pay Juice the extra coin. I hear GC is trying to entice Victorians north.

Also I have a bag of horse sh*t in the shed, i've been hiding it from the interstate clubs so that they dont nab it. Is it too soon for me to nominate it for the PSD? I dont wont Freo to get a snif.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Pick #2

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top