Pick #64 Pass

[Tambo]

Discuss here please.

is he any good?

 

[rfctigerarmy]

Was going to make this thread but though I'd look like a ********.

 

[Vince Spadea]

Very skinny plays outside but has good pace & skills will probably start in the Coburg reserves.

Don't rate him poor pick.

 

[Tambo]

Was going to make this thread but though I'd look like a ********.

I'd rather look like the ****

 

[RichosGuns]

Pass is effectivly a big bodied ruckman. He has had injury troubles but he was a highly touted junior. We is more of a tap ruckman who will probably be used in Coburg unless Pattison and Simmonds are injured. He has been tried at the level before and has failed. Supposibly he has been "training the house down" at Richmond in the pre-season.

Pass = Guy Richards PSD

 

[darcytiger]

could have been anything if it wasn't for...

 

[rfctigerarmy]

I'd rather look like the ****

You wouldn't even have to make the thread.

 

[Tambo]

Very skinny plays outside but has good pace & skills will probably start in the Coburg reserves.

Don't rate him poor pick.

I think pass in his footy is underated. You need him to get the balls to the other players

 

[tony_montana]

definitely wont be our worst player

 

[Tambo]

You wouldn't even have to make the thread.

Thanks ya dodgey ****

 

[UpTheGuts]

Should have chosen Gaertner...... or Gourdis.

 

[Tigerrific]

Is his first name Khyber?

 

[The BRICKSTER]

did Gaertner or what ever get picked up

 

[rfctigerarmy]

I like how this thread has had more replies than Trent Cotchin's.

 

[The Dice Man]

Would rather have picked up 69

 

[Heisenberg_]

Good with footy in hand, awsome passer of the ball

 

[Tambo]

I like how this thread has had more replies than Trent Cotchin's.

It's all in the thread creator

 

[rfctigerarmy]

Don't give me the double smiley.

 

[serpico66]

Given that Kids like Gaertner, Gourdis and McGinnty were still available at Pick 64 could we have picked one of these guys and delisted another player to free up a spot.

If it came to a pick between a Matthew White or Kel Moore versus one of the above three kids, the kids surely have more upside.


Thoughts anyone

 

[emperor]

****en spewing.............pass couldn't hit the side of a barn door

 

[Tambo]

Given that Kids like Gaertner, Gourdis and McGinnty were still available at Pick 64 could we have picked one of these guys and delisted another player to free up a spot.

If it came to a pick between a Matthew White or Kel Moore versus one of the above three kids, the kids surely have more upside.


Thoughts anyone

1) Both Matty white and Kel Moore have contracts. Means we pay out Kelvin one year or matty white 2 years which are remaining on their contracts.

2) We can still select one of these kids in the pre-season draft where we have selection 1. EG we picked up matty white a few years ago using our pre-season draft pick.

This case we get the player you are after, with out terminating a players contract.

3) Rookie draft, we also have selection 1 here to get first grab.


It was easier to pass and work out our list and think about the idea of who we select over the next few weeks. Rather this than a rushed 2 second thought about picking up a player later on.

 

[Weaver]

The only reason for not passing would be if we wanted a bottom-age (17 year old). These guys (Gaertner, Rockliff, Smouha) are not elligable for the PSD or rookie.

Gaertner and Smouha can't kick, and taking Rockliff would be silly with Cotchin secured and playing forward for a year or two.

So PASS makes sense.

 

[IDGAF]

Is his first name Khyber?

baboom tiiiiiiish

Pass will be a better option than ... say ... a Ray Hall

 

[Tigerrific]

baboom tiiiiiiish

Pass will be a better option than ... say ... a Ray Hall

More Pass than Class...

 

[Infamy]

The only reason for not passing would be if we wanted a bottom-age (17 year old). These guys (Gaertner, Rockliff, Smouha) are not elligable for the PSD or rookie.

Weaver, are you sure about that? Have the rules changed? I thought the PSD was for anyone who'd nominated for a National Draft before, you could take a bottom aged kid in the PSD, but if they were eligible for U18s next year then they couldn't be rookied.