Token thank you pick for Hinge getting delisted and getting picked up by Crows outside PSD.I don't understand this one.
Surely that’s against the rules?Token thank you pick for Hinge getting delisted and getting picked up by Crows outside PSD.
Keeps Crows PSD free for Hately I think.
Ermm we're delisting in good faith so Hinge can move right away and got a token pick in return which we may not even use. I don't see anything wrong here. Hinge has been good for us so we are making the path easy for him..Surely that’s against the rules?
Not that it matters too much.
As I said before, it's inconsequential other than being technically against the rules.Ermm we're delisting in good faith so Hinge can move right away and got a token pick in return which we may not even use. I don't see anything wrong here. Hinge has been good for us so we are making the path easy for him..
In comparison GWS didn't delist Hately so he has delisted himself and now have to wait for PSD.
The trade isn't that unfair anyway regardless of the proposed DFA thing going on. Plenty of these trades happen every year makes no difference.As I said before, it's inconsequential other than being technically against the rules.
Trades can't be contingent on other agreements. e.g. the saints wouldn't have been allowed to trade Dunstan to crows on the proviso that they paid crouch more.
This trade technically can't be related to Hinge. Or at least they can't say that it was. The AFL has to think that it stands up on its own.
Would it have happened if Hinge wasn't involved?The trade isn't that unfair anyway regardless of the proposed DFA thing going on. Plenty of these trades happen every year makes no difference.
Probably it suits both clubsWould it have happened if Hinge wasn't involved?
We're going all-in on collecting all Demons picks. May be we know somethingProbably it suits both clubs
I don't think it would have happened if he wasn't involved. Happy to agree to disagree.Probably it suits both clubs
It's such an inconsequential pick swap with a 32 point difference whether or not Hinge was involved. Even in the AFL site they've posted Hinge's delisting and right after wrote about pick swap. It's like an open secret.I don't think it would have happened if he wasn't involved. Happy to agree to disagree.
It's roughlyIt's such an inconsequential pick swap with a 32 point difference whether or not Hinge was involved. Even in the AFL site they've posted Hinge's delisting and right after wrote about pick swap. It's like an open secret.
![]()
Cut Lion goes to Crows as Brisbane delists five, re-signs veteran
Brisbane temporarily removes contract of three players, re-signs one, cuts twowww.afl.com.au
You are getting too hung up on this one for some reason and it makes no sense.
Of course, please go ahead.It's roughly
63 (112 points)
for
66 (80 points) and future 4th est. pick 63 (112 points) = 192 est. total points
I'm just saying that its against the rules if the trade wouldn't have occurred on its own merits, but that no one cares. I'm not sure why you have an issue with me pointing this out?
Brisbane wanted to retain Hinge, therefore he was not on the trade table during trade week. Brisbane offered Hinge a one year deal. Hinge held off and after trade week finished Adlaide offered Hinge two years. It's a no brainier for Hinge to accept Adelaide's offer and head home to SA.Someone explain to me the benefits of doing it this way instead of during trade week..