Remove this Banner Ad

Picola & District Discussion 2026

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I am told clubs will provide 'feedback' to the league. The club 'feedback' will likely be nuanced and non-committal and not be or be interpreted by the league to be a definitive "Yes" or "No" as would be in a democratic style vote of clubs. This type of ambiguous, non definitive feedback will allow the league to make a decision in the "best interests" of the LEAGUE and not necessarily the majority of clubs. This IMO is by design. A vote of all clubs with a 51% or above majority should be the approach to allowing a new club to enter the league after presenting their case to the league board and clubs. Terms of reference should be defined so as all clubs applying are assessed equally. Such things as population/proximity to large population. junior numbers, financial situation, historical success in both football and netball should all be defined in the terms of reference IMO.
 
I am told clubs will provide 'feedback' to the league. The club 'feedback' will likely be nuanced and non-committal and not be or be interpreted by the league to be a definitive "Yes" or "No" as would be in a democratic style vote of clubs. This type of ambiguous, non definitive feedback will allow the league to make a decision in the "best interests" of the LEAGUE and not necessarily the majority of clubs. This IMO is by design. A vote of all clubs with a 51% or above majority should be the approach to allowing a new club to enter the league after presenting their case to the league board and clubs. Terms of reference should be defined so as all clubs applying are assessed equally. Such things as population/proximity to large population. junior numbers, financial situation, historical success in both football and netball should all be defined in the terms of reference IMO.
Change from delegate system to appointed board for decision making , was implemented well before anyone currently involved in any capacity was involved at league / board level .
It’s not by ‘ design ‘ it’s following process .
I’m pretty comfortable that all of the points you raise would be considered , the weight of those and any other points is always contentious and is why the board is appointed and entrusted to make the decision .
The loading is contentious due to many clubs solely and probably rightfully looking at how it affects their own club , now .
I’m pretty sure that the board has no agenda and has not made any decision or discussed prior or beyond what the whole meeting heard last night and as was expressed has no intention of doing so , until clubs have had a further opportunity to raise things they’d like considered and those points are researched.

Aka : Doing their due diligence .
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I think the area inside the fence would be similar but the rovers ground has the boundary in a fair way because of a slope from the fence so id say playing area the Rams ground is bigger. certainly felt that way back in the day running "400's" that apparently are more like "510's":oops:
The Rover ground is 174 m the rams oval is 184 m from goal to goal, yep the Rams is about 530m around the boundary, bet all the old coaches were happy for the boys to do a "400" during training
 
My guess is the vote would be 11/4 for Barooga to join
League already has 15 excellent finals venues and if the league is not split Barooga will host the 2040 Grand final
Barooga will have 43 points next year is that enough to load up on
 
The Rover ground is 174 m the rams oval is 184 m from goal to goal, yep the Rams is about 530m around the boundary, bet all the old coaches were happy for the boys to do a "400" during training
Which is the better surface. Just curious how many grounds around the place that dont have a cricket pitch. Rams and who else
 
Which is the better surface. Just curious how many grounds around the place that dont have a cricket pitch. Rams and who else
Both terrific facilities and grounds for clubs who despite the population size battle with being on the outer edge of their leagues with little AFL wise further north .
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Have heard Levi Middleton playing back at Berrigan in 26, didn’t play at all last year due to injury. Not sure how old he would be but would think if he gets his body right it would be a handy get for them and being a 1 pointer helps as well…..
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Blighty, Rennie
Thought Tunga's wicket was going back in with the cricket club reformed this season and playing all away games until wicket redone before season 26/27
 
Blighty, Rennie
Thought Tunga's wicket was going back in with the cricket club reformed this season and playing all away games until wicket redone before season 26/27
At present there is no pitch, If and when they put one in it will need to be a turf wicket, as per the cricket association requirements.
 
Top 3

Katty

Katandra

Waaia

4-5 in either order

Berrigan

Deni

6-9 battle for the 8

Tunga

Picola

Strathy

Jerilderie

The rest
Dookie

Barooga

Katunga

Rennie

Blighty

Mathoura
Spot on but I definitely have Tungamah up a bit higher. Here is my ladder in the groups

Waaia
Katty

Katandra
Berrigan
Tungamah

Jerilderie
Picola
Strathy

Katunga
Dookie
Barooga
Rennie
Blighty
Mathoura
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom