Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
luke2177 said:Got to respect 'Sheed - even as little as 1-2 years ago he would have been throwing cut lunches like there's no tomorrow. His restraint was unbelievable.
The_Flying_Egg said:Wallace should get maybe 5 or 6 games
Artest, Jackson and O'Neal should get months. Even if provoked, u don't punch fans. Artest is a ********ing tosspot
WoD said:no way should players have to put up with that, yes they are professionals and they have to put up with taunting but under no cirumstances should they be threatened physically
Petrie Dish said:Correct.
At the same time, there is no way a professional sportsman should go after fans in the stands. I don't care if they were provoked in any way, shape or form, they are professional athletes, and they have no place doing what they did. The worst fans involved should be banned for life, but people excusing the actions of JO, Artest and Jackson with lines like "They were only sticking up for themselves" and "I would have done the same thing" is laughable. This isn't a playground game where if someone hits you, you hit back and defend your mates, this is a professional NBA game, where the players have no place reacting like that. If they can't restrain themselves, then they shouldn't be out there playing.
When Artest was hit by that bottle, every Indiana player should have headed straight to the lockerrooms and refused to come back out on the court. As was mentioned before, can you imagine if an AFL player jumped into the stands to remonstrate with a fan after being provoked? The player would get a life ban.
WoD said:at no time was i excusing artests actions, i just hope the nba realises wallace is just as guilty as artest is when they are handing out suspensions
WoD said:vernon maxwell was never physically provoked and assaulted though
Adrian Shelton said:30-40 games for Ron maybe but not the whole season, wonder if he'd have a civil case against the guy for loss of earnings?
WoD said:as i said in the other thread, how does maxwell get 10 games and artest gets 72
Daytripper said:Simple really.
Maxwell was provoked and attacked the right guy.
Artest was provoked and attacked the wrong spectator.
Fans, rightly or wrongly, may feel that they can attend a NBA game and get attacked by a player leaping the stands simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
If Artest had attacked the spectator that provoked him he may have got off easier.
monarch4 said:Been sitting here for the last few minutes reading the replies to this particular topic and some points have come to mind.
I'm thinking in this day and age of the nba (high player salaries etc, etc, etc) high stakes are involved. Watching this particular brawl on espn and what took place in the 72 hours after, i find disturbing that what started as a push and shove after a soft foul evolved into the scenes we viewed on tv.
I don't condone this sort of behaviour whatsoever and i feel the penalties dished out by the nba commision to be justified. And I believe the throwing of the water bottle from the spectator involved was a very cowardly act and should be dealt with accordingly.
I'm thinking to myself watching this episode is what are we teaching our kids........that violence in sport is o.k............i don't believe it is.
PerthCrow said:Agree 100% ...if your going to look at the player why cant we look at the fans?
Krisholio I understand your frustration but the player MUST keep his temper in check no matter how much of a Homer the fan is.
Are Detroit an aligned club with Richmond?