Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Tossing up between these 2 combinations.
1) McPhee + Corey + Mackay + Cox + H-Mac
and
2) S.Stevens + Ablett + T.Tuck + Petrie + Simmonds
Any advice appreciated
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
id go with fisher should average 90-95 where as lockyer should average 80-85 so you will benefit by 10ppg.lockyer vs s.fischer?
id go with fisher should average 90-95 where as lockyer should average 80-85 so you will benefit by 10ppg.
as for your post below i would go mcintosh should hopefuly average 75+. ottens has looked out of sorts in the nab series and has had injury problems.fraser may average 80+ but is he worth the extra 40k over hamish? well thats your decision but h-mac for me.
mitchell should average around 90. gets a ton of the pill but tends to handball a lot and dosnt get a heap of marks.also likely to get tagged quite often but still should ok. personally selwood looks the better option at that pricecheers thats exactly what i was thinking...
what are peoples thoughts on sam mitchell and clinton young?
i would expect deledio to average 95+ and roughy around 85 so thats 180 and 2 definete keepers.i am tossing up whether or not to have the following
deledio + roughhead
selwood + silvia?
thought??
i would expect deledio to average 95+ and roughy around 85 so thats 180 and 2 definete keepers.
selwood should average 95 but silvia im a little unsure about has the potential to average 90 but more likely 75-80.
i would go the 1st option purely on having 2 definete keepers and its the more safer option. but there aint a lot in it. foley and cousind should get the tag which will allow deledio to run free and rack them up. and roughy will get great supply from the hawks mids and should kick his 4 or 5 a game.
fraser vs macintosh vs ottens ??
Something to think about, Sylvia had 10 scores above 90 (6 above 94) from 18 games last year and averaged 82 for the year.i am tossing up whether or not to have the following
deledio + roughhead
selwood + silvia?
thought??
ive been looking at porps as well.he should average 90 for the year but there is a few question marks as to wether he will play round 1 as he had shoulder surgery during the summer. if you have good enough bench players to cover for a week or 2 then get porps. its certainly an option im looking at. with a bit of luck he might even be right to go round 1. he could be a great buy at 347 000 odd. gets plenty of the footy and kicks 2 or 3 goals a game very unique choice but one im seriously looking atwhat about porpz vs roughhead?
cornes boys for me both should have big years and average around 100.swan is a dt gun but shaw can go missing when he gets sum attention. i would just feel safer with the brothersK.Cornes + C.Cornes (2 port) vs Swan + H.Shaw (2 pies)
fraser vs macintosh vs ottens ??
I would say Ottens. He is playing for a high scoring side, can sneak forward and kick a couple goals and if he can stay injury free should average more than big mac and fraser.
If you need some cash though then macintosh is a good option but i cant see him improving much from last year.
Cox + HMac +0k vs Simmonds + Petrie +24k
With HMac and Petrie playing alongside Hale, which of the three will be the No 1 ruckman. Im a bit worried about Laidley's propensity to use Petrie as a KPP sometimes which i would imagine would limit his scoring potential in those games, however he does play far more regularly and would be a better 'lock and leave' player
Yarran v Krakouer v Sidebottom