Higgins and Houlihan easily
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Player Comparison Thread - Part 2
- Thread starter 54Dogs
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Higgins and Houlihan easily
Ablett jnr + McIntosh vs Cross + Hille
- Feb 28, 2009
- 38,244
- 35,574
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Baltimore Ravens, Atletico
Depends on whether you have other rookies starting in the midfield with Beams. If you do, then i would go with the second option as Higgins + Houlihan is a safer bet and could quite easily be upgraded to 3 keepers later on in the season.
T Tuck + Yarran vs Rich + 300k forward
T Tuck + Yarran vs Rich + 300k forward
hasleby vs grigg?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
swan vs murphy vs cornes vs dalziel?
Ben the Gooner
Stand by Hird
I'd probably have Robinson starting, as well as Rich.
The first one. I don't see much value at 300k, unless you get Lucas or Higgins, and spend the extra cash elsewhere.
Bartel/Corey + McIntosh vs Hille + J.Selwood/S.Tuck
Keep in mind that I already have Ablett.
Keep in mind that I already have Ablett.
- Nov 23, 2008
- 12,452
- 293
- AFL Club
- Essendon
No guts no glory?
Depends, if you don't have a captaincy option: go a Cornes or Swan. If you want a nice midfielder go Murphy and If you want to be different go Dalziell.
- Jul 15, 2008
- 397
- 355
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Well I would go for the first option if McIntosh is your 2nd ruck.
But if hes your first ruck go option 2.
Also whats everyones thoughts on;
A) Petrie and Adcock
or
B) Sylvia and Marty Clarke?
Would take the second, but if you have houlihan in ya backs swap him forward and pick a back around 300K
- Sep 19, 2006
- 2,754
- 4,667
- AFL Club
- Richmond
this is tough
Corey + Rich + Kreuzer
OR
Foley + Polkinhorne + Hille
Corey + Rich + Kreuzer
OR
Foley + Polkinhorne + Hille
Look for a poll on this question on the first page or two of the threads.
- Jul 15, 2008
- 397
- 355
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
1) Petrie/Sylvia + Roughead
or
2) O'Keefe + McPhee?
or
2) O'Keefe + McPhee?
ROK is consistent but with Sydney struggling he might aswell. Some Essendon fans are calling for McPhee to play forward or be dropped to the VFL, I can't see him 1.Playing forward and 2.Scoring well if he does play forward, so I'd go Sylvia and Roughy.
My problem...
Malceski vs Sylvia
Yes, I know they are in different positions, but I can only get one of them.
I don't know why they would think this, he won AA honors and a B&F running of the HBF, IMO thats his best position, there isn't a lot of room up forward for him now.
I'm not sure why they would think that either, it was just a NAB game anyway. I only saw 2 people that suggested it though so it's probably an unfair comment.
Its the preseason and a guy like McPhee is a perfect bloke to discuss.
In his case it might be more important to look at where he's been getting it rather than how much of it in practice games.
Despite any disappointment Dons fans may show he is first 22 and well priced. Not an essential by any stretch but nonetheless worth at least looking at seriously.
In his case it might be more important to look at where he's been getting it rather than how much of it in practice games.
Despite any disappointment Dons fans may show he is first 22 and well priced. Not an essential by any stretch but nonetheless worth at least looking at seriously.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Feb 28, 2009
- 38,244
- 35,574
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Baltimore Ravens, Atletico
Simmons(90-95) + Ottens/Fraser(80) + Waite(~82)
OR
Cox(110) + HMac(75) + Houlihan(70-75)
Ive put what i expect of the players in brackets. The first option IMO is safer (which would be good because of risks ive taken elsewhere in the team), but the second could provide better value should HMac get good TOG (which may be a problem with Laidley coaching and 2 other good ruckman at North) and Houlihan play all 22.
OR
Cox(110) + HMac(75) + Houlihan(70-75)
Ive put what i expect of the players in brackets. The first option IMO is safer (which would be good because of risks ive taken elsewhere in the team), but the second could provide better value should HMac get good TOG (which may be a problem with Laidley coaching and 2 other good ruckman at North) and Houlihan play all 22.
catsdynasty
Team Captain
u always need a big Cox
catsdynasty
Team Captain
I reckon McIntosh + Giansiracusa plainly because these two I think will get you the most points... aaaannd because I have them.
And sorry I was meaning to also put this into my other reply but wasn't sure how to change it.
Sylvia vs McMahon.
I realise they are in different positions, but I can swing Houlihan either way as the extra player. Sylvia has all the hype, McMahon plays in the most DT friendly team going around (well, besides the cats). Seems to be the go-to man, and should get a lot of the pill considering the zoning this year. Should average 85, exactly enough for keeper status in the backs.
Sylvia needs to up his average to 90 to be keeper material, and im somewhat doubtful he will get there.
Thoughts?
I realise they are in different positions, but I can swing Houlihan either way as the extra player. Sylvia has all the hype, McMahon plays in the most DT friendly team going around (well, besides the cats). Seems to be the go-to man, and should get a lot of the pill considering the zoning this year. Should average 85, exactly enough for keeper status in the backs.
Sylvia needs to up his average to 90 to be keeper material, and im somewhat doubtful he will get there.
Thoughts?
- Status
Similar threads
