List Mgmt. Player Ranking System

[TeeJay Blue]

I don't know ... self deprecation seems to get the likes. Are they laughing or agreeing though?

Other Users: I am a good-for-nothing loser
Response: Don't say that (Like post)

NavyBlueTJ35: I am a good-for-nothing loser
Response: Yes, Yes you are! (Ignore user)

 

[thylacine60]

I self-deprecated this morning. Nothing I'm proud of.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Other Users: I am a good-for-nothing loser
Response: Don't say that (Like post)

NavyBlueTJ35: I am a good-for-nothing loser
Response: Yes, Yes you are! (Ignore user)

Wasn't sure whether to like or ignore.

 

[LordLucifer]

No time for your game play. You know what it means.

Wasn't intended to be game-playing .....trying to make a joke at my own expense.

 

[thylacine60]

Happy to do that for you, Effendi.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Wasn't intended to be game-playing .....trying to make a joke at my own expense.

You're not deluded. You just have your own opinions.

 

[mediumsizered]

I self-deprecated this morning. Nothing I'm proud of.

I bet you felt better afterwards.

 

[LordLucifer]

You're not deluded. You just have your own opinions.

I'm sure we could find plenty of people who would have it the other way around.

 

[gandaal]

I'm sure we could find plenty of people who would have it the other way around.

Being delusional is more fun.

Join us. Join us.

We can have long chats about how that Nick Holman is a star.

Oh wait...

 

[ShanDog]

The reviews above are designed to give an indication of performance.

They are examples I am using to demonstrate how a player's yearly performance should be a reflection of their performances across the year, and not how you feel they did.

Liking your work and plan to review after each game. I'm not a stats or math guru but I would suggest two things:

1. Decide if ratings are subjective (weighted in the context of player's experience, position and/or past performance etc) or purely objective and try to stick to it consistently.

2. When analysing numbers, present both mean and median results. The difference between the two numbers could tell us a bit about their consistency.

 

[Blue and Silver]

Liking your work and plan to review after each game. I'm not a stats or math guru but I would suggest two things:

1. Decide if ratings are subjective (weighted in the context of player's experience, position and/or past performance etc) or purely objective and try to stick to it consistently.

2. When analysing numbers, present both mean and median results. The difference between the two numbers could tell us a bit about their consistency.

They will have to be subjective, everything is.

But I am trying to account for impact, which means involvement in scoring chains, winning difficult contests etc. as well as raw statistical output.

Stats should be a guide, but impact (positive and negative) should account for some movement up and down. For example, I have been considering what a 10 point ranking is, and I rather think that can only be determined through a viewing. 40 disposals ought not be enough, indeed I think a superstar could win a game in 30 if they were super good

 

[RudyBlue]

They will have to be subjective, everything is.

But I am trying to account for impact, which means involvement in scoring chains, winning difficult contests etc. as well as raw statistical output.

Stats should be a guide, but impact (positive and negative) should account for some movement up and down. For example, I have been considering what a 10 point ranking is, and I rather think that can only be determined through a viewing. 40 disposals ought not be enough, indeed I think a superstar could win a game in 30 if they were super good

 

[MitchRobinson12]

Might as well do a retrospective for every player on the list over the summer. Starting with Andrew Walker in the #1 jumper:

Menzel next? Or would you skip.

Without looking it up I think he would've averaged <4.

 

[Azul]

What does 'delusional' mean ??

Melbourne supporters who hold hope they'll ever see a(nother) premiership in their lifetime.

 

[Jabba73]

They will have to be subjective, everything is.

But I am trying to account for impact, which means involvement in scoring chains, winning difficult contests etc. as well as raw statistical output.

Stats should be a guide, but impact (positive and negative) should account for some movement up and down. For example, I have been considering what a 10 point ranking is, and I rather think that can only be determined through a viewing. 40 disposals ought not be enough, indeed I think a superstar could win a game in 30 if they were super good

Cyril Rioli only needs 4 or 5 .....