Player that should be dropped this week

[hilly69]

The poll

 

[Stakerz]

Williams AND Obree

 

[browny4PM]

What poll??

But in answer to your question, definately Williams for Maxwell, possibly Lonie for Rowe.

If Didak comes up, maybe O'bree (quite unlikely though).

 

[Cassius_Clay]

just Walker for me

 

[hilly69]

Lonie didnt have his best game but the love child williams has to go for Rowe does anyone know if Rowe is injured or just didnt get picked

 

[Bautista]

OUT - whole collingwood team
IN - pack of ******ed monkeys

It would be an improvement.......

 

[leonmagic]

just Walker for me

May I ask why?

He's actually one kid coming along well..

 

[Cassius_Clay]

May I ask why?

He's actually one kid coming along well..

as a what??? Ruck,CHF,CHB???

 

[Lonie_from_50]

May I ask why?

He's actually one kid coming along well..

I love the Text, infact, no,12 may be on my back, yet as you might see on TMN, the fact that he was in as a ruckman/forward, not defender/............ruckman.

Mick Malthouse not bringing in C Cloke hurt us, I think for the best, it would be a good swap that C Cloke for T Walker - I would be disappointed - or C Cloke for S Prestigiacomo. Apparently the members on BF think Presti is god, and think there is no chance that he will get dropped, i really hope he does to help my case that his arse isn't safe at Pie Land.

 

[browny4PM]

I love the Text, infact, no,12 may be on my back, yet as you might see on TMN, the fact that he was in as a ruckman/forward, not defender/............ruckman.

Mick Malthouse not bringing in C Cloke hurt us, I think for the best, it would be a good swap that C Cloke for T Walker - I would be disappointed - or C Cloke for S Prestigiacomo. Apparently the members on BF think Presti is god, and think there is no chance that he will get dropped, i really hope he does to help my case that his arse isn't safe at Pie Land.

Get over the whole "Presti is sh*t" thing. He is one of the only blokes that does his job each week. Just because there was no matchup for him on the weekend doesn't mean he'll get dropped, remember the doggies weren't playing any talls up forward.

Maybe have a look at your boy, Andrew "I'm responsible for the Bulldogs first 3 goals in the last quarter" Williams.

 

[leonmagic]

as a what??? Ruck,CHF,CHB???

All of the above.

 

[dumesny1]

Tarrant and Rocca

 

[bradrowe#32]

Out - Tim Robbins
In - Rob Lowe

 

[maccas_no1]

Im interested to know, how Buckley will be played this week?? Will he still be rotated off the bench or will he play a full game in the middle?

 

[leonmagic]

Im interested to know, how Buckley will be played this week?? Will he still be rotated off the bench or will he play a full game in the middle?

I dont know that he'll play at all to be honest...

 

[eddiesmith]

OUT
Walker- Team balance more than anything, he cant ruck so bring in a player who can
Williams
Buckley

IN
C.Cloke
Rowe
Maxwell

Team changed, Shaw survives due to Buckleys injury

 

[FIGJAM]

Williams didn't play especially bad. It's just he has no future with us.

Presti was fine considering there were limited match ups.

Shaw was good, albeit typically soft of several occassions.

O'Bree is king of the Plod Squad.

I'd reckon J Clo can ruck as well as Walker. Walker needs a fixed position and it's pretty clear that that position will be in the backline.

To put it simply, we're in need of a rebuild.

 

[browny4PM]

OUT
Walker- Team balance more than anything, he cant ruck so bring in a player who can
Shaw
Williams

IN
C.Cloke
Rowe
Fanning

So we're going to play with 21 this week are we?? Drop 3 blokes and bringing only 2 blokes that didn't play this week. Considering we're playing a side with a fairly potent midfield why would we drop our number 1 run-with player??

Going by pre-season form Cam will not do any better than Tex, so why drop him when he is our young KPP developing the best??

Why wouldn't Maxwell come in ahead of Cam??

OUT: Buckley (inj), Williams, Lonie(?), O'bree(?)

IN: Maxwell, Rowe, C. Cloke(?), B Shaw(?)

 

[eddiesmith]

So we're going to play with 21 this week are we?? Drop 3 blokes and bringing only 2 blokes that didn't play this week.

I meant Maxwell, not Fanning

Considering we're playing a side with a fairly potent midfield why would we drop our number 1 run-with player??

I didnt drop Holland or Licuria

Going by pre-season form Cam will not do any better than Tex, so why drop him when he is our young KPP developing the best??

Because he cant ********ING RUCK. He was in the side as a ruckman, he cant ********ing do it. Cam would atleast provide a better contest, and wouldnt give away the most stupid free kicks that Walker is now becoming famous for

Why wouldn't Maxwell come in ahead of Cam??

I meant Maxwell, but one is Defender, the other is Ruckman/Forward

OUT: Buckley (inj), Williams, Lonie(?), O'bree(?)

IN: Maxwell, Rowe, C. Cloke(?), B Shaw(?)

You would drop Lonie and O'Bree

 

[Presti_is_god]

Yeah lets drop Presti because there was no one to play on because of the small fwd line the Dogs were playing. And lets drops him because MM made him play fwd. Its all his fault.....


Drop Williams for Rowe. Walker for C.Cloke.

Bucks for Maxwellif he doesnt play.

 

[browny4PM]

I meant
Because he cant ********ING RUCK. He was in the side as a ruckman, he cant ********ing do it. Cam would atleast provide a better contest, and wouldnt give away the most stupid free kicks that Walker is now becoming famous for



I meant Maxwell, but one is Defender, the other is Ruckman/Forward



You would drop Lonie and O'Bree

I would omit Buckley and Williams, with a question mark over Lonie and O'bree.

Now that Bucks is definately out it's unlikely that O'bree will be dropped because he will have to fill the hole.

Lonie's omission would be a kick up the a*** because he played with no heart what so ever on Monday.

Tex is not in the side solely as a ruckman, he can play at either end of the ground also. If you had followed our form during the preseason you would know that cam couldn't even get a touch for Willi, so why would playing senior footy suddenly find him some form.

I'm not opposed to cam getting a run in the seniors, i think it may actually fix our forward structure a little. But suggesting to drop Tex and Shaw shows how much of a d***head you are.

 

[eddiesmith]

Because in the team structure Tex was played as a ruckman in the game on Monday and did ******** at it. We cant carry too many talls in the side as we are slow enough as it is

As for Shaw, he turned the ball over so many ********ing times it was an embarrasment. I wonder if some people just look at stats and say, he got lots of it, great game, even though he did absolutely nothing with it. If Bucks is out, i would leave him in

 

[browny4PM]

Even though he's not a very credible source, Balmey said he is out indefinately.

As for Shaw, i know he turns it over occasionally but it is the way he goes about his footy that is encouraging. He puts his body on the line and appears to have toughed up physically and mentally. If only some other blokes followed his lead, we'd go a ong way to winning a few more matches.

Tex is versatile, that's why he's in the side. He can fill pretty much any role of a big man. Remember he was playing on Darcy, possibly the best ruckman going around playing his first game as captain and was pretty switched on.

 

[bucksisbest]

You would drop O'Bree

Yeah because it would really hamper the side to lose O'Bree , I mean who would get soft touches , kick floaters for our forwards to get crunched under and could anyone else be able replicate O'Bree's natural movement of running backwards when he gets the ball?

 

[leonmagic]

As for Shaw, he turned the ball over so many ********ing times it was an embarrasment.

Pos: 26
Clangers: 4


Keep trying.