Player X v Y v Z - 2017

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Grundy/stef
V
Grundy/sandi

Thoughts and opinions please?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Hibberd
Can float mid too if need be.

Roughead, Mundy and Barrett (Bench) with potential to loophole best score with Powell-Pepper
V
Greene, Swallow and Taranto (Bench) with potential to loophole best score with Powell-Pepper
Greene and Swallow and Taranto
 
This is for AFL Fantasy (but that board is dead, and both score similarly for these players iirc):

Macrae + Taranto + Stef Martin (49k in the bank)

vs

Ryder + Roughead + Gawn (5k in the bank)

2nd option

Pick your better trio:

Goldy / McCarthy / Florent
V
Stef Martin / Roughy / Mountford

2nd option
 
Depends what you get rid of to get stef over sandi
would have to get rid of tom lynch but could get in Steele, not that confident in Steele but I wasn't confident in nank and now I'm crying after his score last night
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Roughie & Ryder & bugger all cash for rookie adjustments

Vs.

Buddy & Taranto & $70K for rookie adjustments.

Bud & Taranto seem the more sensible option but Ryder and Rough push Nank to F5, which could be very fruitful.
I like the first.
Always reckon KPP can be bought cheaper (Roughy obviously low already)& I'm not sold on Taranto JS. Rideher rucking solo too.
 
Ryder V T.Greene. Mind you having Greene will give me no ruck cover, cant even afford Pruess. My rucks are Goldy and Sandi

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Parfitt v florent??

If I have parfitt that means I'll have 55k left if I take florent I will have 13k
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top