Thread starter
#1
As we have good depth now, there will be fierce competition, particularly between older players of similar type/position for places in the team. To have a chance of playing games this year and possibly avoid being one of the candidates for delisting later in the year, I think, one wouldn't want to end up being judged as the worst-performed player in any of the following parings/groupings:
1. Ellard, McLean and Curnow
2. Collins and Kerr
3. Rowe and Casboult
4. White, Bower and Thornton
5. Davies, Russell and Duigan
6. Joseph and Armfield (perhaps Davies should be included here instead?)
Does anyone have any thoughts on how any of these players might perform in comparison to others in the same pairings/groupings?
Note: Apart from Duigan, Curnow and Rowe (who were more mature recruits), I haven't included any first or second year recruits as they are still developing.
1. Ellard, McLean and Curnow
2. Collins and Kerr
3. Rowe and Casboult
4. White, Bower and Thornton
5. Davies, Russell and Duigan
6. Joseph and Armfield (perhaps Davies should be included here instead?)
Does anyone have any thoughts on how any of these players might perform in comparison to others in the same pairings/groupings?
Note: Apart from Duigan, Curnow and Rowe (who were more mature recruits), I haven't included any first or second year recruits as they are still developing.

