List Mgmt. AFL Senior List Contract Status

[robbieando]

SYDNEY SWANS CONTRACT STATUS (Updated 10-APR-2024)

The minimum list size for each club will be 37, which can be made up of as little as 36 senior listed players and one rookie.

To reach 44, clubs can carry 36-38 senior listed players, four to six Category A rookies, and two Category B rookies.

List make up - 37 Senior Listed players, 5 Category A rookies and 2 Category B rookie.


Contract Expires - 2024:
Harry Arnold (Cat A Rookie 2nd Year)
Jack Buller (Cat A Rookie 2nd Year)
Harry Cunningham
William Edwards (Cat B Rookie 2nd Year)
Oliver Florent
Robbie Fox
Aaron Francis
Will Hayward
Indhi Kirk (Cat B Rookie 1st Year)
Jacob Konstanty
Jaiden Magor (Cat A Rookie 2nd Year)
Lachlan McAndrew (Cat A Rookie 3rd Year)
Logan McDonald
Lewis Melican
Caleb Mitchell
Sam Reid (Cat A Rookie 1st Year)
Cooper Vickery

Contract Expires - 2025:
Braeden Campbell
Caiden Cleary
Joel Hamling
Peter Ladhams

19

Peter Ladhams

Age

26

Ht

204cm

Wt

103kg

Pos.

Ruck

Career

Season

Last 5

D

15.7

4star

K

6.8

3star

HB

8.8

5star

CL

3.3

5star

HO

15.0

5star

D

21.0

5star

K

9.0

4star

HB

12.0

5star

CL

4.0

5star

HO

16.0

5star

D

14.6

4star

K

6.4

3star

HB

8.2

5star

CL

3.2

5star

HO

14.8

5star

Jake Lloyd
Luke Parker
Dane Rampe
Matthew Roberts
Angus Sheldrick
Patrick Snell
Chad Warner
Corey Warner
Sam Wicks
John Longmire (Senior Coach)

Contract Expires - 2026:
Taylor Adams
Joel Amartey
Will Green
James Jordon
Justin McInerney

Contract Expires- 2027:
Brodie Grundy
Tom McCartin
Hayden McLean

Contract Expires - 2028:
Errol Gulden
Issac Heeney
Tom Papley
James Rowbottom

Contract Expires - 2029:
Callum Mills

Contract Expires - 2031:
Nick Blakey

 

[Cadsky]

robbieando Ladhams is on a 4 year contract which puts him to the end of 2025, not 2024.

 

[robbieando]

robbieando Ladhams is on a 4 year contract which puts him to the end of 2025, not 2024.

Thanks for picking that up. Counted 2021 as a contacted year by mistake

 

[Cadsky]

Of next year's expiring contracts, there's literally less than half that I'd be keen to keep. The rest meh.

 

[Jewelsbon]

Of next year's expiring contracts, there's literally less than half that I'd be keen to keep. The rest meh.

Can't say as I agree.
Of the 17 listed above, there are 8 that I believe have to be re-signed
- Cunningham, Florent, Fox, Gulden, Heeney, Lloyd, McDonald, McInerney
2 that if all goes well, would love to see given a one year extension
- Franklin and Rampe,
And 3 for whom it will be dependent on their development this year.
- Gould, O'Riordan, McAndrew

Leaving only Kennedy, Sinclair, Naismith and Taylor that I think will definitely be gone this time next year.

 

[Grand Uncle Horace]

Sadly I doubt Logan will stay. Both WA Clubs need KPFs and if he shows further development in 2022 he will field significant offers. It is telling for me he has not signed an extension. Jmac will also field significant offers from Melbourne Clubs.

 

[Membling]

Sadly I doubt Logan will stay. Both WA Clubs need KPFs and if he shows further development in 2022 he will field significant offers. It is telling for me he has not signed an extension. Jmac will also field significant offers from Melbourne Clubs.

See how it plays out.

Lot of factors in the background with a big on being current contracts. Could have some decent coin to go around end 2022.

 

[FreeAgent1]

Sadly I doubt Logan will stay. Both WA Clubs need KPFs and if he shows further development in 2022 he will field significant offers. It is telling for me he has not signed an extension. Jmac will also field significant offers from Melbourne Clubs.

Freo will draft Jye Amiss and West Coast are apparently deep into Naughton (plus the doggies will have wayyy to many KPF soon)

 

[Grand Uncle Horace]

Freo will draft Jye Amiss and West Coast are apparently deep into Naughton (plus the doggies will have wayyy to many KPF soon)

Hope you are right.

 

[Bandicoot]

If we currently have 31 senior list spots taken, Wicks will make it 32. Our draft picks suggest we will only take 3 selections meaning we will either resign Reid or add a delisted free agent taking us to our preferred number of 36.
I'd prefer to take Reid as a rookie.

 

[BloodySwan]

If we currently have 31 senior list spots taken, Wicks will make it 32. Our draft picks suggest we will only take 3 selections meaning we will either resign Reid or add a delisted free agent taking us to our preferred number of 36.
I'd prefer to take Reid as a rookie.

I think Bell is all but confirmed as having his contract extended after triggering. Clarke despite some reports seems to be contracted until next year + Wicks we're at 34 already.

We must be waiting to see who gets delisted before we commit to Ronke as well

 

[rustycrate]

I think Bell is all but confirmed as having his contract extended after triggering. Clarke despite some reports seems to be contracted until next year + Wicks we're at 34 already.

We must be waiting to see who gets delisted before we commit to Ronke as well

I reckon Ronke is a goner. If we keep Clarke it is on the rookie list. We don't have a lot of experience on the bench with the departures of Hewett and Dawson.
We also may need a hard tagger at some stage.

 

[FreeAgent1]

If we currently have 31 senior list spots taken, Wicks will make it 32. Our draft picks suggest we will only take 3 selections meaning we will either resign Reid or add a delisted free agent taking us to our preferred number of 36.
I'd prefer to take Reid as a rookie.

With the changes to the rookie rules, it just saves you $80k in TPP. I’d imagine we go with min list size, so we will leave decision on Reid till after draft

 

[TheMase]

I reckon Ronke is a goner. If we keep Clarke it is on the rookie list. We don't have a lot of experience on the bench with the departures of Hewett and Dawson.
We also may need a hard tagger at some stage.

We could also shift someone like Taylor to the rookie list too by delisting and picking up as a rookie aka Sam Gray last year (so he would see out the last year of his contract). Chances are there is more benefit as Clarke is quite likely on less coin.

 

[rustycrate]

We could also shift someone like Taylor to the rookie list too by delisting and picking up as a rookie aka Sam Gray last year (so he would see out the last year of his contract). Chances are there is more benefit as Clarke is quite likely on less coin.

But Taylor is not OOC. Clarke is and affects our minimum list structure. Mazimising rookie listed players.

 

[Dubai Quacker]

Wicks has signed for 2.

 

[Bonz]

Wicks commits to the Swans

There's no place like home. Local product and lively forward Sam Wicks has signed a two year contract with the Swans.

www.sydneyswans.com.au

Article about Wicks

 

[hairy biker]

Obviously good to see , but I was sort of hoping the delay in announcing his re-signing was because he, Errol and Logan would all be announced at the same time.

 

[TheMase]

But Taylor is not OOC. Clarke is and affects our minimum list structure. Mazimising rookie listed players.

Neither was Gray!

Our senior list financial savings are likely greater with Taylor on the rookie list than Clarke (I’m guessing of course by since Taylor won the rising star one might assume he might be on more).

The club also hasn’t mentioned Clarke being off contract that I’ve seen so perhaps he has already been re-contracted in some capacity.

 

[rustycrate]

Neither was Gray!

Our senior list financial savings are likely greater with Taylor on the rookie list than Clarke (I’m guessing of course by since Taylor won the rising star one might assume he might be on more).

The club also hasn’t mentioned Clarke being off contract that I’ve seen so perhaps he has already been re-contracted in some capacity.

I didn't think you could move a listed player to the rookie list. I might be wrong again. I thought the rules changed last year just for last year.

 

[TheMase]

I didn't think you could move a listed player to the rookie list. I might be wrong again. I thought the rules changed last year just for last year.

Sorta right

AFL confirms 2022 list sizes, tweaks rule for rookies

Any players in their third season as a Category A or B rookie will be eligible to spend another season as a rookie in 2022

www.afl.com.au

But the rule that allowed clubs to move primary-listed players to the rookie list between the first and second list lodgment periods to open up senior spots will not be permitted this off-season.

In a memo to clubs, the AFL said that there is "no forecast changes to list sizes for 2022" and that the one-off rule was brought in last season due to the changes that came late in the piece with list sizes and structures.

They will, however, be able to shift players on the senior list to the rookie list in the time between the national and rookie drafts if the player is contracted for 2022.


Not sure if that helps us. Pretty sure we have delisted a contracted player before as well and picked them up in the rookie draft with no issues. I can’t recall who it was.

 

[rustycrate]

Sorta right

AFL confirms 2022 list sizes, tweaks rule for rookies

Any players in their third season as a Category A or B rookie will be eligible to spend another season as a rookie in 2022

www.afl.com.au

But the rule that allowed clubs to move primary-listed players to the rookie list between the first and second list lodgment periods to open up senior spots will not be permitted this off-season.

In a memo to clubs, the AFL said that there is "no forecast changes to list sizes for 2022" and that the one-off rule was brought in last season due to the changes that came late in the piece with list sizes and structures.

They will, however, be able to shift players on the senior list to the rookie list in the time between the national and rookie drafts if the player is contracted for 2022.


Not sure if that helps us. Pretty sure we have delisted a contracted player before as well and picked them up in the rookie draft with no issues. I can’t recall who it was.

I didn't know the rule was extended to this year as well. The player was Fox.

 

[TheMase]

I didn't know the rule was extended to this year as well. The player was Fox.

The rule is slightly different as to when you can do it.
I remember Fox, wasn’t him. But I remembered, it was Tippett!

 

[rustycrate]

The rule is slightly different as to when you can do it.
I remember Fox, wasn’t him. But I remembered, it was Tippett!

I'm a bit confused with the rule and how it applies to the this year.
I read the statement from the AFL and it is very ambiguous.

Can we move a player from the main list to the rookie list. If so wich players and why why not. hehe. It's confusing.

 

[BloodySwan]

Sorta right

AFL confirms 2022 list sizes, tweaks rule for rookies

Any players in their third season as a Category A or B rookie will be eligible to spend another season as a rookie in 2022

www.afl.com.au

But the rule that allowed clubs to move primary-listed players to the rookie list between the first and second list lodgment periods to open up senior spots will not be permitted this off-season.

In a memo to clubs, the AFL said that there is "no forecast changes to list sizes for 2022" and that the one-off rule was brought in last season due to the changes that came late in the piece with list sizes and structures.

They will, however, be able to shift players on the senior list to the rookie list in the time between the national and rookie drafts if the player is contracted for 2022.


Not sure if that helps us. Pretty sure we have delisted a contracted player before as well and picked them up in the rookie draft with no issues. I can’t recall who it was.

So we have someone like Naismith and Taylor stay on our senior list, move them to a rookie spot and pick up a DFA. Not sure I understand the sense in it from the AFL.....

 

[rustycrate]

So we have someone like Naismith and Taylor stay on our senior list, move them to a rookie spot and pick up a DFA. Not sure I understand the sense in it from the AFL.....

Me too