Society/Culture Hypocrisy of The Left - part 3

[Malifice]

If that person is in consultation with the other party and can truthfully speak on their behalf, there's nothing wrong with the objection.

So you're saying I should just walk on past when I see a burning cross in my African neighbors front yard then?

Being a white, heterosexual, man, I can only speak for (and in favor of)... white, heterosexual men?

 

[Noidenous]

So you're saying I should just walk on past when I see a burning cross in my African neighbors front yard then?

Being a white, heterosexual, man, I can only speak for (and in favor of)... white, heterosexual men?

You can speak for anyone you like.

Just don't expect anyone who recognises blatant exaggeration of interest/association to listen.

 

[smokingjacket]

You can speak for anyone you like.

Just don't expect anyone who recognises blatant exaggeration of interest/association to listen.

You're literally describing identity politics. You're saying there are truths that can only be understood through racial experience.

 

[Noidenous]

You're literally describing identity politics. You're saying there are truths that can only be understood through racial experience.

Yes, and milking the experience of others for all the brownie points its worth by assuming representation is a disgusting act.

See: virtue signalling.

 

[smokingjacket]

Yes, and milking the experience of others for all its worth is a disgusting act.

See: virtue signalling.

So identity politics are good when they stop the libs from being annoying on the internet?

 

[Noidenous]

So identity politics are good when they stop the libs from being annoying on the internet?

What an idiotic statement.

 

[smokingjacket]

What an idiotic statement.

Foiled again.

 

[Noidenous]

Foiled again.

Whatever helps you sleep.

 

[medusala]

If someone objected to calling a First Nations person a “B**** or a female Aboriginal person a “g$n” - would that be political correctness gone mad?

Thats a world away from it being reported as a "hate crime" and police taking action.

 

[Dixie Normous]

Nobody picks those cherries like the limousine left - Jussie Smollett being the textbook example

 

[Father Jack]

Yes, and milking the experience of others for all the brownie points its worth by assuming representation is a disgusting act.

See: virtue signalling.

interesting that you assume that's all anyone does it for. It's like you think that anything is only worth doing if it's solely for your own benefit

 

[Noidenous]

interesting that you assume that's all anyone does it for. It's like you think that anything is only worth doing if it's solely for your own benefit

Oh, that's not the only reason.

Alleviating one's own psyche of guilt would be another.

 

[Dixie Normous]

Angus Taylor.

View attachment 631129

Wow, that's fascinating.

 

[Pessimistic]

Several radio stations etc have announced they won’t be playing Michael Jackson music any more.

I must say I can’t remember the last time I heard any stations play Michael Jackson, but it struck me as odd because these are only accusations and there’s been plenty before.

Or is it just a sick publicity grab?

 

[Dixie Normous]

As far as LNP lies go, not really.

I'd rather watch that documentary about Michael Jackson sucking young boys' utensils back in the 80s

 

[Snake_Baker]

How is that working out for you?

Conducting myself as an adult? Brilliantly.

 

[Contra Mundum]

Nobody picks those cherries like the limousine left - Jussie Smollett being the textbook example

Sorry what has cherry picking got to do with Jussie Smollett.

Can you stick to Australian examples - I know there is not a lot of coverage of our issues on 4chan or Breitbart and Ben Shapiro is not really Across indigenous issues

I am just trying to work out where the oppressive line is drawn - what about calling Jews “kikes” - to pull someone up on that - is that political correctness gone mad?

What about holocaust denial - to call that bullshit or protest a speaker who promotes it - a hammer blow against free speech?

If I was to call White Anglo Saxon males who slavishly ape American tropes and memes on a footy forum as lacking a capacity for independent thinking - what about that?

I am sure you will come back with a directly relevant Ben Garrison cartoon

And you worry about the Group think of the triggered left
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Contra Mundum]

Your statement makes absolutely no sense.

What happening is being conflated?

The Milo protestors and the kids in class are two different groups of people . The conduct and exchange of ideas in academic classes and what the Socialist Alternative do outside the classes is a different thing altogether


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Father Jack]

Oh, that's not the only reason.

Alleviating one's own psyche of guilt would be another.

So that's not for your own benefit?

 

[Dixie Normous]

Sorry what has cherry picking got to do with Jussie Smollett.

Can you stick to Australian examples - I know there is not a lot of coverage of our issues on 4chan or Breitbart and Ben Shapiro is not really Across indigenous issues

I am just trying to work out where the oppressive line is drawn - what about calling Jews “kikes” - to pull someone up on that - is that political correctness gone mad?

What about holocaust denial - to call that bullshit or protest a speaker who promotes it - a hammer blow against free speech?

If I was to call White Anglo Saxon males who slavishly ape American tropes and memes on a footy forum as lacking a capacity for independent thinking - what about that?

I am sure you will come back with a directly relevant Ben Garrison cartoon

And you worry about the Group think of the triggered left
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

If you have ask to this question, you will never appreciate the answer. Look deeper and read between the lines. Google Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley if you need a frame of reference

As for the rest of your post, I can't help you. I don't know who '4 chan', 'Brietbart' or 'Ben Garrison' are. Can't help you there, buddy

 

[Contra Mundum]

If you have ask to this question, you will never appreciate the answer. Look deeper and read between the lines. Google Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley if you need a frame of reference

As for the rest of your post, I can't help you. I don't know who '4 chan', 'Brietbart' or 'Ben Garrison' are. Can't help you there, buddy

I think my point was I am not interested in an American frame of reference. It is a frame that has no relevance here


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[ShanDog]

I think my point was I am not interested in an American frame of reference. It is a frame that has no relevance here


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

I wouldn't say NO relevance. There's no denying we take on some of the USA's cultural movements, and our academia certainly mirrors much of the wider western trends too. It's not about whether we follow suit, it's about how much we do.

 

[Noidenous]

So that's not for your own benefit?

Not when you're heaping guilt on yourself to facilitate the cycle.

 

[Noidenous]

The Milo protestors and the kids in class are two different groups of people . The conduct and exchange of ideas in academic classes and what the Socialist Alternative do outside the classes is a different thing altogether


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

There's no difference when the Socialist Alternative are running those classes and dictating canon.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

You can’t claim both post modernism and Marxism are the dominant philosophies in humanities departments.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app