I'm not upset, I asked for a difference between the 2 that results in such passionate feelings from a portion of Australian society. You bought up us following the US into war as a reason for the passion. Logically that implies that Trump is more likely to careen us into war, at least in the minds of the passionate anti-Trump brigade. Now you're saying it's just a general concern and not related to a differentiating point between the 2 candidates. We were never discussing general international politics.
If you're discussing general international concerns, then I share those concerns. But I was very clear that I think there's more passion than knowledge in this discussion and I'm keen to learn where Trump differs so greatly to Clinton and how that will impact us. You're responses didn't go close to addressing the differences, so I wonder why you bothered at all.
I have learned something though,
deaneus has googled and it appears as though both houses of US parliament need to agree to go to war, so neither candidate would have had unilateral power in that regard. So any further war mongering as described by
Kristof looks to be off the table.
Now we can thrash out Clinton's desire to keep interest rates at 0% and that'll be the end of your stated concerns.