The question is impossible to answer because there are any number of different lenses to read the article through. Informing the Australian public, and the world, that the US takes allies committing war crimes seriously might improve our relationship as it shows we're not, as a nation, burying that embarrassing interaction. Equally, that communication might have been intended for ADF ears only, in which case it might strain our political relationship with the US.
Either way, this article can't be held responsible for moving the dial because it is essentially Hansard with push notifications. It simply recounts what was said in the Senate Estimates hearing. I don't think that Hansard as a function can be found responsible for impacting political relationships.
What was said in the hearing certainly can, but that is the responsibility of the people asking the questions and those answering them.
Your question also has nothing to do with bias, which you brought up in the first place. Bias means there is some sort of agenda being pushed. I don't think the article is pushing an agenda.
Great so we agree that all articles have bias.
The question is simple to answer - I am only asking for your opinion.