The "minority" I was referring to was his christian pentacostalism, and when I used the term "fighting", it may have elevated what I was saying about Morrison to suggest his fight was for some noble cause for those who might be marginalized, disregarded or even oppressed, but it is none of those things. I meant it in the context of Morrison having previously stated that he had been called to do "God's work".
By his words and by his actions; like in his intervention in the NSW Liberal party pre-selection to favour his pentacostal picks, or by his special favour to get his spiritual mentor Brian Houston (currently charged with covering up child sexual abuse) into the White House to pray for President Trump, it become clear that he wasn't governing for all of the electorate, but rather to spread his peculiar and often intolerant faith. The "we don't trust in Goverments" statement confirmed that insidious agenda.
I'll quote from James Ley's essay that I linked in previous posts which articulates more stylishly much of what I've been trying to explain:
"Morrison’s declaration of principle all follow from his use of ‘secularism’ as a euphemism for godlessness. He is positioning himself as an embattled believer, defending his religious faith against a hostile ‘secular’ society, unaware that he is battling his own incomprehension, claiming a ‘freedom’ he already possesses."
You are making statements of fact based on your assumptions of a persons actions. That is not something I like to do.
I have said over and over that I wasn't a fan of Morrison and would have voted for Albo if not for the radical Greens.
You have also not answered my question about minorities. Which ones do you support and why? Are you against all religions or just christianity? I am looking for principle as a way of trying to find common ground.