Poll: Roughead V Tambling

[eyeofthetiger]

lol. Drafting Tambling over Franklin was not just a mistake, but without doubt the biggest draft clanger of the decade and one of the biggest gaffs on record. And what's worse, the Richmond faithful are being reminded of the enormity of the draft clanger every time Franklin kicks a bag over the next 5 years or so.

i think the kruzer over cotchin will be a close second parrot.

 

[lethalselbow]

i think the kruzer over cotchin will be a close second parrot.

If you're going to have a go back, try a line of attack with some credibility.

 

[parrot]

we have a far better list than carlton.......

This needs some explanation...

... and without Judd.

 

[lethalselbow]

you idiot .. tambling is still in the top 10 from that draft ... he was not a mistake, a mistake would be if he was picked 4 and didnt play at all ... that is a mistake ...

Umm.... sure.

Tambling was a mistake that's going to cost Richmond appearing in finals for another decade. He's a serviceable player that has the heart of a pea, which Wallace has dropped him for in the past.

Tambling is an average player.

 

[Mitchell Madness]

we have a far better list than carlton. when you have hacks like setanta x2, hackland, heartless (hartlett), eddie betts, houlihan, carrazzo and wiggins things arnt too good.

as for parrot i bet it must hurt everytime selwood gets over 30 possies all effective to gibbs 15. not knockin gibbs though i think he will be a good player as will tambling.

as for the exciting times...heres a few names.
white who
cotchin been good
hughes one good game
foley been ok
delideo good first season, average since
tambling yes bling hahahahaah
riewoldt good name, very average
thursfield who
rance has he played yet
gourdis who?
moore good name that
conners who?
edwards nyesh......

some pretty exciting young talent there.

there you are, great list that.

 

[the ranger]

thursfield who

Way to prove that you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[curry23]

Absolutely. Loads of them.

Tambling was a mistake and, on reflection, should have been picked at around 30 - 40. If you think of him as a selection in the 40's then he's doing alright.

As it is, players get judged on where they were picked. That's how it is.

Chris Mayne was pick 40 last year and he has already done more than Tambling

 

[BLUE BLEEDING]

roughead easily. i saw tambling live against carlton, he did absolutely nothing. and its not too early too judge if people are judging gibbs, kruezer, palmer, selwood, cotchin.

 

[BLUE BLEEDING]

we have a far better list than carlton. when you have hacks like setanta x2, hackland, heartless (hartlett), eddie betts, houlihan, carrazzo and wiggins things arnt too good.

as for parrot i bet it must hurt everytime selwood gets over 30 possies all effective to gibbs 15. not knockin gibbs though i think he will be a good player as will tambling.

as for the exciting times...heres a few names.
white
cotchin
hughes
foley
delideo
tambling yes bling
riewoldt
thursfield
rance
gourdis
moore
conners
edwards

some pretty exciting young talent there.

ALL A LOAD OF SHIT!

better list than carlton? no. all your good old players are over 30 (nathan brown 30 and richo 34) too old. stevens and fevola are our oldest and their 27 and 28).
we have 3 number 1 draft picks you have 1.
we have the best player in the comp in judd.
and development everywhere.

you do still have a good list, but its not better than ours.
ours is the youngest in the comp and we have an extra $2 million in our cap (more when fev and stevens go on the veteran) so there is still room for jonothan brown, kerr and pavlich (we wont get them though).

the O'hAilpin brothers are an irish experiment! how can you possibly judge them?

as for the selwood vs. gibbs comment.
isn't it also a bit too early to be judging him?
selwood is the only player in the 06 draft performing better than gibbs, at the moment.


carrazo is definatly better than tambling and maybe even houlihan, wiggins and betts.

THERE IS A VERY GOOD REASON WHY PEOPLE SAY CARLTON HAVE A BRIGHT FUTURE!

 

[curry23]

ALL A LOAD OF SHIT!

better list than carlton? no. all your good old players are over 30 (nathan brown 30 and richo 34) too old. stevens and fevola are our oldest and their 27 and 28).
we have 3 number 1 draft picks you have 1.
we have the best player in the comp in judd.
and development everywhere.

you do still have a good list, but its not better than ours.
ours is the youngest in the comp and we have an extra $2 million in our cap (more when fev and stevens go on the veteran) so there is still room for jonothan brown, kerr and pavlich (we wont get them though).

the O'hAilpin brothers are an irish experiment! how can you possibly judge them?

as for the selwood vs. gibbs comment.
isn't it also a bit too early to be judging him?
selwood is the only player in the 06 draft performing better than gibbs, at the moment.


carrazo is definatly better than tambling and maybe even houlihan, wiggins and betts.

THERE IS A VERY GOOD REASON WHY PEOPLE SAY CARLTON HAVE A BRIGHT FUTURE!

All that show is that u tank better than them, FWIW your list is better than Richmonds.

 

[dyl_tigerman]

This needs some explanation...

... and without Judd.

you may have that but what about this....

1st2nd3rd4thRichmond4.38.511.517.7(109)Carlton4.39.610.1011.13(79)

and this is with judd...
u d__head...

 

[BLUE BLEEDING]

All that show is that u tank better than them, FWIW your list is better than Richmonds.

the afl couldn't prove that we did, so how can you?

even if we did, it's fine with me. we got judd and kruezer.
thanks for agreeing with me.

 

[BLUE BLEEDING]

you may have that but what about this....

1st2nd3rd4thRichmond4.38.511.517.7(109)Carlton4.39.610.1011.13(79)

and this is with judd...
u d__head...

your as good as your last game, and in your last game we BEAT you by 30 points (without judd).
your the ######## buddy.

 

[curry23]

the afl couldn't prove that we did, so how can you?

even if we did, it's fine with me. we got judd and kruezer.
thanks for agreeing with me.

I just dont see how a team can be so $#!t for so long, no probs

 

[BLUE BLEEDING]

I just dont see how a team can be so $#!t for so long, no probs

bankruptcy, dept, we were robbed of picks 1 and 2 in 2002.
shit drafting prior to the collapse, departures, and crap players spread throughout our line-up 2002-2007.

its all paying off now!

 

[Tigersman]

bankruptcy, dept, we were robbed of picks 1 and 2 in 2002.
shit drafting prior to the collapse, departures, and crap players spread throughout our line-up 2002-2007.

its all paying off now!

You were not robbed of anything.
You cheated the competition and were punished accordingly.

 

[dyl_tigerman]

You were not robbed of anything.
You cheated the competition and were punished accordingly.

exactly... you guys needed to be deregistered it was that bad cheating... it is like playing 19 players every week...
carlton don't deserve anything... you didn't lose 1 and 2 from anything but your own stuff up

 

[Beloved]

Nice bump Roughy is starting to show why he was pick 2 Tambling is getting better but Roughy WILL be near unstoppable in the next few years.

No he's not, you can cut the cherade now.

 

[Beloved]

You were not robbed of anything.
You cheated the competition and were punished accordingly.

AND, we're still a better team that Bitchmond.

 

[W. Smithers]

A shame we still beat your rabble with Murphy and Carrazzo playing, but without Judd, Walker, Bower, Houlihan, Bannister and Hadley who are in our best 22.

Exciting times ahead for the Tigers.

Oh dear

 

[W. Smithers]

there you are, great list that.

How about the Hawks draftees since 2004

Roughead - handy but inaccurate and one dimensional
Franklin - Second coming of Allen Jakovich
Lewis - Slow, undisciplined
Murphy - ??
Little - ??
Taylor - Mitchell and Hodge make him look good
Ellis - Very unremarkable for a pick 3
Dowler - lol
Birchall - has been found out
Bailey - ??
Muston - ??
Thorp - See James Sellar
Renouf - Undisciplined
Rioli - Wonaeamirri is better and a rookie pick

 

[lethalselbow]

How about the Hawks draftees since 2004

Roughead - handy but inaccurate and one dimensional
Franklin - Second coming of Allen Jakovich
Lewis - Slow, undisciplined
Murphy - ??
Little - ??
Taylor - Mitchell and Hodge make him look good
Ellis - Very unremarkable for a pick 3
Dowler - lol
Birchall - has been found out
Bailey - ??
Muston - ??
Thorp - See James Sellar
Renouf - Undisciplined
Rioli - Wonaeamirri is better and a rookie pick

As always, your opinion is a joke. Stay in Bay 13.

 

[Headless]

How about the Hawks draftees since 2004

Roughead - handy but inaccurate and one dimensional
Franklin - Second coming of Allen Jakovich
Lewis - Slow, undisciplined
Murphy - ??
Little - ??
Taylor - Mitchell and Hodge make him look good
Ellis - Very unremarkable for a pick 3
Dowler - lol
Birchall - has been found out
Bailey - ??
Muston - ??
Thorp - See James Sellar
Renouf - Undisciplined
Rioli - Wonaeamirri is better and a rookie pick

Gotta say, that's a good list of kids the Hawks picked up.

 

[Gene Simmons]

Let's not beat around the bush...

Tambling is crap and a very good reason for all Richmond supporters/followers/barrackers to feel abit embarresed that the Tigers picked him when they could have picked Franklin..

But then again, this is the same club/coach who thought Kent Kingsley would win the Coleman and Trent Knobel would be their premiership ruckman..

While we are on the subject, how about picking Fiora over Pavlich

Why don't you start a poll about that one?

 

[parrot]

Disappointing, but you have to wonder just how much of Richmonds truly shocking player development is to blame.

Roden and Ottens managed to escape and then thrived. Shulz and Meyer tried desperately to be traded last year, but were blocked by Miller. Tambling might join the "I want out of this place" queue at the end of the season I suspect.