Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
Wait, how does that work with in-game collisions? How are you supposed to tackle somebody from the front without contacting their chest?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
aim for the hipsWait, how does that work with in-game collisions? How are you supposed to tackle somebody from the front without contacting their chest?
Stupidity, not only will it be difficult to umpire and lower any tackling, it's a differentiation the games should not have."Baaall!"
"In the back, umpy!"
"Didn't have, ya mug!"
"Tiiits!"
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-01-19/chest-area-to-be-sacrosanct-in-aflw-matches
You, that's working well in rugby this year where they cracked down on high tackles, injuries have gone up from hip to head contacts.aim for the hips
They've had an perfectly good clash jumper for about 10 years it was just unfortunate that our one off PB jumper clashed with their clash jumper from behind, once, four years ago.Carlton now has a proper clash guernsey.
Hope they wear it against us.
I like this one far more. The more ridiculously white it is. the better.They've had an perfectly good clash jumper for about 10 years it was just unfortunate that our one off PB jumper clashed with their clash jumper from behind, once, four years ago.
At least its not ambiguous. Gotta give them credit there.New interpretation change will take fans some time to adjust, says AFL umpires boss
"Schwab clarified that no player other than the two nominated ruckman would be able to contest a boundary throw-in until the ball hit the ground, even if it fell short of the contesting ruckmen."
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/new...s/news-story/114a8dd9c682048a6bbbc73f666e45c7
lol. So if the throw-in is short, everyone has to stand around until the ball hits the ground before they can touch it? Bizarre.
It's nice and cleaner as a straight inverse of their home.I like this one far more. The more ridiculously white it is. the better.
Next step, $10 white singlet with CFC sharpied on and electrical tape for the numbers..It's nice and cleaner as a straight inverse of their home.
They removed the shield thing from the back last year, FYI.
"Baaall!"
"In the back, umpy!"
"Didn't have, ya mug!"
"Tiiits!"
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-01-19/chest-area-to-be-sacrosanct-in-aflw-matches
Richmond will win a final before the AFL leaves the rules alone for once - it's what they do.Stupidity, not only will it be difficult to umpire and lower any tackling, it's a differentiation the games should not have.
In fact the rules should be identical.
Doggies for mine.http://www.theage.com.au/afl/womens-afl/which-aflw-team-should-you-support-20170112-gtpycx.html
With only eight teams taking part in the upcoming AFLW season, many footy fans are going to have to pick a new team to support. But don't panic - we're here to help. By answering a few brief questions, you can find out just who to back in the 2017 season.
the throw ins arent short, its that the rucks set up twice the distance the umps are instructed to throw it....New interpretation change will take fans some time to adjust, says AFL umpires boss
"Schwab clarified that no player other than the two nominated ruckman would be able to contest a boundary throw-in until the ball hit the ground, even if it fell short of the contesting ruckmen."
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/new...s/news-story/114a8dd9c682048a6bbbc73f666e45c7
lol. So if the throw-in is short, everyone has to stand around until the ball hits the ground before they can touch it? Bizarre.
the throw ins arent short, its that the rucks set up twice the distance the umps are instructed to throw it....
blame the players, not the umps
ill correct and say it 18 metres for length, otherwise absolutely correct.This.
Umps guidelines are for 12 - 15 metres length and about 20m high.
Seeing players continuously stand on the edge of the centre square for throw ins is infuriating. The boundary ump then has to give it extra to reach the players, lest it is not contestable and gets recalled and he looks like an incompetent fool despite the fact it's the ruckmen being wildly out of position. It would be like standing on the wing for the centre square bounce.
Sent from mTalk
ill correct and say it 18 metres for length, otherwise absolutely correct.
Its annoying for me, who as a boundary ump, see rucks set up 25-30 metres away and then get recalled for a good throw
He was probably just there, in his capacity as Ambassador for the Environment.
So they listened to Graham Cornes then."Baaall!"
"In the back, umpy!"
"Didn't have, ya mug!"
"Tiiits!"
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-01-19/chest-area-to-be-sacrosanct-in-aflw-matches