Game Day Ports vs Essington #SackHinkley

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

So Channel 7 actually showed the rooms after the game and the song.
There was about 5 minutes from the end of the game till the start of the news program. I reckon they were confident of a Bombers win.
 
Enviable Tradition said:
So true.

We actually used Charles' strengths for once.

He draws defenders to him. We used his free team mate.

He uses his strength in packs to hold off 3 defenders. We floated across the front to mark.

He brings the ball to ground. We crumbed.

If we play a proper forward line we can play off Charlie all day and any goals be gets are just cream.

On SM-G960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Click to expand...
I don't think that's going to cut it long term.
 
Ladhams. Geez he was bloody good. Glad he's getting games, I reckon Ryder is done and likely partnership of Lycett and Ladhams looks to be the future.

The forward line structure seemed better because there actually was a structure. We must keep Marshall and Dixon playing together. It clearly brings the smaller forwards into the game by not allowing a the opposition's tall defenders to drop off and intercept the forward entries.

Ryder is not a key forward and looks to have lost his spring and leap.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

HinkleysHeroes said:
on replay why does it look Smokey on outer wing?
Click to expand...
Essington run on to pyrotechnics like we do at AO. With the roof closed it took quite a while to vent the smoke.

Typing "Essington" made me realise that I have actually been to Port Essington NT. Fittingly all that's left is ruins.
 
Harro59 said:
Ladhams. Geez he was bloody good. Glad he's getting games, I reckon Ryder is done and likely partnership of Lycett and Ladhams looks to be the future.

The forward line structure seemed better because there actually was a structure. We must keep Marshall and Dixon playing together. It clearly brings the smaller forwards into the game by not allowing a the opposition's tall defenders to drop off and intercept the forward entries.

Ryder is not a key forward and looks to have lost his spring and leap.
Click to expand...

As good as Ladhams has been in his early games, I'm on the same page as cookieboy re Hayes, who has so much upside ( no pressure ;) ) that he could be the best ruckman we have had for a very long time.

I'm looking forward to seeing them work in tandem at afl level.
 
Ladhams and Hayes should be our ruck combo going forward from next year on. Both so far above others on the list.
 
ozph1870 said:
Ladhams and Hayes should be our ruck combo going forward from next year on. Both so far above others on the list.
Click to expand...
If lycett gets a medium/long term injury at some stage this will open the door... for both hayes and ladhams.. and lycett might struggle to get past them if ladhams and hayes continue developing like I hope.

*not wishing injury on lycett at all.
And more then happy with lycett since joining us.
 
dirty2 said:
If lycett gets a medium/long term injury at some stage this will open the door... for both hayes and ladhams.. and lycett might struggle to get past them if ladhams and hayes continue developing like I hope.

*not wishing injury on lycett at all.
And more then happy with lycett since joining us.
Click to expand...
They're only young, but ladhams and Hayes are far superior footballers.
 
ozph1870 said:
They're only young, but ladhams and Hayes are far superior footballers.
Click to expand...

I like how people make bold, definite statements like this off of the back of three games for Ladhams and zero for Hayes.

Both have talent, but for all we know they'll never be as good at AFL level as Lycett already is, let alone be 'far superior'. To say they're already 'far superior' is just silly.
 
Schulzenfest said:
I like how people make bold, definite statements like this off of the back of three games for Ladhams and zero for Hayes.

Both have talent, but for all we know they'll never be as good at AFL level as Lycett already is, let alone be 'far superior'. To say they're already 'far superior' is just silly.
Click to expand...
Bold call.. Yes.. But they are, I'm very confident.
I also like what Lycett brings, but these other two are going to be alot better. No doubt about it.
 
ozph1870 said:
Bold call.. Yes.. But they are, I'm very confident.
I also like what Lycett brings, but these other two are going to be alot better. No doubt about it.
Click to expand...

'Going to be' is one thing. They may well develop into better players in the long run, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they were. But they're not yet.
 
Schulzenfest said:
'Going to be' is one thing. They may well develop into better players in the long run, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they were. But they're not yet.
Click to expand...

Barnaby French, Craig Auckland say hi
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

gbear
  • Locked
Game Day Ports quest for a 5 in a row certificate vs Essington
55 56 57 58 59
Replies
1K
Views
19K
raptalia
raptalia
Manhattan Bronx
  • Locked
Game Day Round 3 - Port vs Melbourne
52 53 54 55 56
Replies
1K
Views
21K
Duckimus Prime
Duckimus Prime
Manhattan Bronx
  • Locked
Game Day Port vs Richmond - Boak's 350th
53 54 55 56 57
Replies
1K
Views
19K
PJ Power
PJ Power
RossFC
2nds WWT Eagles vs Port Adelaide - Round 3 @ Woodville
Replies
14
Views
463
Scodges
Scodges
RossFC
Review Port Adelaide vs Fremantle - Trial Match 2 @ Alberton
37 38 39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
30K
rogerjames
rogerjames
RossFC
Review Port Adelaide vs Crows - Trial Match 1 @ Alberton
40 41 42 43 44
Replies
1K
Views
37K
Steve Dore
Steve Dore
Manhattan Bronx
  • Locked
Game Day Port vs Giants
81 82 83 84 85
Replies
2K
Views
45K
Port 2004
Port 2004

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top