Carbine Chaos
The Gaff-er
- Apr 1, 2009
- 63,945
- 94,273
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
Why? He's pretty reliable.Cole still makes me clinch up when he gets near it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why? He's pretty reliable.Cole still makes me clinch up when he gets near it
This is actually a dry period for Qld. Could get a bit of dew but Mostly dry. Wet season is summerPositives +
Negatives -
- Nic Nat doing what he does best. Cyril Rioli like impact with less disposals even if he finished with 14 and giving us a scoring opportunity from stoppages. Deserves AA this year but selectors may only look at statistics not actual impact.
- Gov, saved our bacon again and surely can still get AA if he continues to perform like that despite missing games with injury and suspension.
- Rotham, was solid and took a couragous mark when GWS had the momentum. Him in the side frees up McGovern and Barrass.
- Barrass didn't do much but was still solid in defense keeping Cameron goalless.
- Brander, starting to come nicely and is using the ball well and took strong marks.
- Tim Kelly's touches have been gold in this game and greatly benefited from Nic Nat's silver service.
- Sheppard destroyed Greene and won the footy himself.
- Shuey was solid.
- Duggan's kicking has significantly improved.
- AhChee's ball use and decision making improving and did well this game like he kicked it to an open Gaff instead of an under pressure Shuey.
- XON definitely AFL standard unlike Ains*****.
- Darling took some strong marks and converted his chances.
- JK was ok and killed some contests when outnumbered. Wasted some getable shots.
- Ryan, even if he was quiet, he bought the ball to ground and assisted some scores even if he didn't kick a goal.
- We did well without Yeo and Redden.
- Cripps effort and pressure has been great this game.
- Forward pressure and team pressure has been good in the game although we've dropped off a bit but this maybe because we're saving our energy against Richmond since we're coming off a four day break.
- We're soo bad in the wet. GWS started to get momentum back when it's wet. Richmond or whoever we're up against will be favourites against us if we play like this in slippery QLD.
- Allen was pretty quiet.
I’d be interested in that. I’ve always thought he should be a mid. He’s got good skills in closeDylan82 do you have the midfield/wing break down? Interested to see how many times Cole lined up on a wing.
Dylan82 do you have the midfield/wing break down? Interested to see how many times Cole lined up on a wing.
I don't understand this at all?Cole still makes me clinch up when he gets near it
Miguel Sanchez has been doing this
I noticed this too and thought it was strange.I'm intrigued about the instructions Brander seems to be operating under. I sat on the broadcast side wing and twice the same thing happened. The ball was chipped to the back pocket for a mark. Ahead along the boundary line were Brander and an opponent. He made no effort to lead or call for the ball. Other players like Sheed and Kelly came over and Brander then jogged into the square, not really keeping an eye on the ball. Eventually the ball was kicked from the back pocket to a contest where we didn't really have a marking target. Happening once was a little odd, but twice seemed predetermined. But why would you remove a 195cm player from a one on one and send him out of the contest to be replaced with smaller non marking types? And he appeared to be going to a particular place that I couldn't really see as offensive or defensive. Brander's main attribute as a winger is his height, he towers over most of his opponents, so why wouldn't we exploit that?
Jacks moved into the top 50 for the first time in his career. Easy to see why. He’s an accurate kick, and brings others into the game. I’ve often felt he’s a barometer for the side as much as Nic.Nic's been awesome but my positive here is jack. Don't wanna jinx him but he's improved 10 spots in the last month. His due for big one soon
View attachment 944358
Been nervous to speak up about Reid on here, watched him closely yesterday- he's very slow to react and was running in circles. Apart from that tackle last week, he's done nothing to hold his spot I feel.
Jacks moved into the top 50 for the first time in his career. Easy to see why. He’s an accurate kick, and brings others into the game. I’ve often felt he’s a barometer for the side as much as Nic.
speaking of Nic, he’s #5 in the AFL for their player ratings this year. (Minimum 8 games) This system is one that can come close to rating his impact as it does relate to contested ball, score involvements and scoring chains. Things he is elite at.
He’s ranked at 161 from 21 rateable games. He will be back to top 10 if he keeps at this rate for the next year. (Rates off the last 40 matches) It’s phenomenal to think this is a guy who’s had 2 knee reco’s.
Isn't that the defensive wing role that Masto used to play? e.g. fill the corridor in case there's a turnover, get on ya bike i50 if the ball's retained?
Know that's not utilising Brander's height, but I'd rather him doing the thankless running than wasting one of our other mids in the off chance that he takes a contested pack mark down the line.
He was. I think his highest was 4 IIRC.Not that player ratings are the be all and end all but from memory he was in the top 10 when he did his first knee.
Brander had the highest recoreded sprint, (33kph from memory)
From what I’m told by a sport science academic, the GPS data for the afl is apparently very inaccurate and is really just there as fluff for the fansGoing off-topic for a moment, I do wonder about these sprint speeds that are recorded and their accuracy, because to be honest they are not quick.
Granted, I come from a running background, but I'm 38 and can still exceed 35kph over 30m routinely each time I train or play.
Considering the fitness profiles out there in the competition, I would have expected top speeds that are well in excess of what is being reported.