There has been some talk of Hille being the starting ruckman as oppose to Cox. But I'm sure most Essendon fans agree that Cox has been better (not much), not only has he had more hitouts, but he gets a heap of disposals around the ground as well, It's a fair effort dominating so much in a struggling side like Cox and Hille have done (although you guys have been doing all right towards the latter end of the year
). But I must admit I have always been a fan of Hille and I have definitely noticed and enjoyed his improvement, he has improved alot more than Cox. What may sway the selectors, is that most of them are victorians (i think), and that Hille has improved alot more than Cox. I think if Hille ends up being the starting ruckman, then Cox has been a victim of his own standards.
Just my 2 cents, anyone agree?
Just my 2 cents, anyone agree?



