rossfunke said:i think tom is eligable for another year in the tac cup.
incorrect
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
rossfunke said:i think tom is eligable for another year in the tac cup.
Belly said:Point is we shouldn't look at rookie listing Couch because of his last name, he's not quite up to AFL level.
.
Donohue and Nankervis will be starting with the Falcons. If I'm correct, both are bottom-aged next year.
Betcha they wangle it so Mark's son is eligible to be picked-up under the father/son by the Weagles or Dockers. Another Cousins, Peake deal I reckon.
Isnt Donohue meant to be quite big? thats what i heard! i'm not to sure if it is true though!
Young Buck is a solid lump of a lad for his age.
Off the top of my head, came second in a long-kicking comp with about 50m. Not sure about athleticism, more of a Scotty Cummings type??
Wangle it? You make it sound like the Cats are a bit hard done with the F/S rule. Brian Peake played something like 60 games for the Cats in an unspectacular career, but played a bucketload of games for East Fremantle. Also, if you actually consider Brett Peake when he started playing, his F/S selection is probably around his actual draft value at the time. His background was in skateboarding and surfing and started playing football very late. Certainly nothing like Hawkins, Ablett(s), Scarlet real draft values.