- Oct 16, 2011
- 19,714
- 53,062
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It's more a guideline, sort of like "a soccer pitch should be this length by this width"
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Potential training breach?
- Thread starter SuperBashBros
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
It's more a guideline, sort of like "a soccer pitch should be this length by this width"
Deaneus!
We Await Silent Tristero's Empire
I believe we got a fine for that.
Last edited:
- Oct 1, 2015
- 876
- 2,075
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Congratulations on post 119 in the thread.
FR0GGY
Busy
Really? I thought isolation was just that and hence the reason people can’t really travel on the road, because they’d have to see other people?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Oct 16, 2015
- 24,279
- 30,561
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
How hard is it though....1...2...F-me, pretty simple stuff
If you’re isolating at your own house, or in this case a hotel that no one else is at, then you can go outside. You can’t go outside at hotels with a lot of other strangers also quarantining in.
Red mist
Reynholm Industries
- Jun 30, 2014
- 29,184
- 34,127
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, East Side Hawks
This is the worst thing we’ve ever done on a golf course apart from playing a hole with Pykey.
No evidence to say they weren’t training in groups of two but were doing it near each other, which someone has mistaken for a big group training together.
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
You are isolated on your property. For instance mates of mine came back from Tassie just after the borders shut, they could go out into their front and backyards but couldn't have anyone over.
I'm assuming we got permission to go on the resort grounds, but a few idiots went in a group rather than a pair
- May 7, 2007
- 5,108
- 6,063
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
If we cop any penalties for this, just fold the club.
Tell the VFL to GAGF!
Tell the VFL to GAGF!
- Sep 30, 2014
- 18,956
- 40,138
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
So the assistant coach in charge coming back from interstate. Was our favourite forward line coach, wasn’t it.
- May 7, 2007
- 5,108
- 6,063
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
They were in groups of two and there was no training. They were rotating drills. The ball was just kicked to the next group of 2 so they could do kick to kick. There was only one ball.
How hard is it to make up some BS story?
How hard is it to make up some BS story?
The club only has one ball available due to budget cuts... just for a bit more mayo
- Moderator
- #164
Pretty much, and it's a spiteful rule from the AFL because the Victorian government still limits training sessions to groups of two.
Red mist
Reynholm Industries
- Jun 30, 2014
- 29,184
- 34,127
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, East Side Hawks
Omg. Going from my essential service was hideous this arvo.
Last ten days or so seems normal out on the roads. Bout 5 six weeks ago I was going Mt Barker to North in like 50 minutes
Red mist
Reynholm Industries
- Jun 30, 2014
- 29,184
- 34,127
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, East Side Hawks
Because they saw 16 people.
It’s just an innovative training drill blown out to infecting the world.
So who was the assistant coach?
Surely they would have been extra cautious knowing the scrutiny they'd be under.
Surely they would have been extra cautious knowing the scrutiny they'd be under.
GreyCrow
Make me an Admin!
- Mar 21, 2016
- 92,178
- 155,896
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox, Tasmania
Martin Prince as Rob Chapman
Rob Chapman after he agrees to a 5 year Sanction from the AFL and agrees to hand over his lunch money
Rob Chapman after he agrees to a 5 year Sanction from the AFL and agrees to hand over his lunch money
I think the whole idea of sending a group of 16 away to a resort, knowing the 2 person rule, was pretty dumb.
I do sometimes despair at our clubs incompetence. We set ourselves up as a bit of a laughing stock, continually giving ammunition.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
They were expecting restrictions in Victoria to ease by next Monday, at which point all clubs can train in groups of 10.
Red mist
Reynholm Industries
- Jun 30, 2014
- 29,184
- 34,127
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, East Side Hawks
Stop making excuses for no decent defense. It happened.
The innovative training drill will be made legal or illegal on further investigation
That’s Monday.
Sending a group of 16 footballers to a resort sets up the potential for something like this to happen.
Jack is Back
Premiership Player
- Apr 17, 2013
- 4,449
- 10,174
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Surely it would be better if the AFC had players in groups of two rotating through Tom Jonas’s shack?
The “even playing field” from the AFL/VFL is total bullshit. The fact that the Victorian teams have a lower number of interstate players than the non-Victorian teams means that they already have an advantage. Less players to bring “home” and face a 14 day isolation period. If the AFL were so keen on an even playing field they would maintain the 2 player “rule” until every player in every team has finished their 14 days.
The usual suspects take the opportunity to pour shit on the Crows. IMHO it was a good idea for the 18 players to be isolated in a locked down facility. As far as SA‘s Covid 19 situation, people returning to SA from Vic/NSW/Qld are more likely to have the virus than anyone in SA. From a footy point of view a mini-camp would be more conducive for our players to prepare for round two than handballing with a mate in the backyard
My only complaint is that we were tying the naked players to trees, although it was in groups of two.
The “even playing field” from the AFL/VFL is total bullshit. The fact that the Victorian teams have a lower number of interstate players than the non-Victorian teams means that they already have an advantage. Less players to bring “home” and face a 14 day isolation period. If the AFL were so keen on an even playing field they would maintain the 2 player “rule” until every player in every team has finished their 14 days.
The usual suspects take the opportunity to pour shit on the Crows. IMHO it was a good idea for the 18 players to be isolated in a locked down facility. As far as SA‘s Covid 19 situation, people returning to SA from Vic/NSW/Qld are more likely to have the virus than anyone in SA. From a footy point of view a mini-camp would be more conducive for our players to prepare for round two than handballing with a mate in the backyard
My only complaint is that we were tying the naked players to trees, although it was in groups of two.
Last edited:
