Diehard Saint
Brownlow Medallist
What’s the point of questioning them anyway though? When was the last time you saw one of them say “You know you’re right, here, I’ll change my decision”?
Never ever ever.
It’s a total waste of time and energy and it adds nothing to the game and only sets a bad example for the lower and in particular junior leagues.
They have huge umpiring shortfalls and that’s a problem. Unless of course you want games umpired by the respective teams, like in the schoolyard.
So if cutting down on arguing with them encourages more to start umpiring, at basically no cost to AFL level footy- because the players will adapt quick-smart, if they’re giving away 50m penalties in games for points- then it seems a bit of a no-brained to me.
Just get on with playing and save your energy for doing what you’re payed to do, which is play.
They’ve been questioning umpiring decisions for as long as the game has been played.
Has it ever resulted in a single decision ever being reversed? Not that I’m aware of.
Has it resulted in umpires getting every decision right? Clearly not.
So what does it achieve?
What will we lose if it’s taken out of the game?
Does anyone follow the footy so that they can see those playing arguing with umpiring decisions? Does Ben Long or Dougal Howard going troppo at an ump put bums on seats?
You almost never see Rugby Union or NRL players arguing with the referees.
I wonder if, in footy, it’s because the the umps and players are too “close.” I don’t think it helps when umps are calling players by their nicknames etc - it’s too familiar and pally. There should be some distance between them.
I’d be saying Dustin, not Dusty, Maxy, Steeley etc.
The pally feel might be nice, but it’s hardly professional imo.