I've seen enough - #SignHinkley
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also Mayes looks like a far less successful Lionel Messi
21 goals to 20 goals games then.Nope fun game but our defense is going to get killed this year , 10th finish on the cards but in a more enjoyable way
21 goals to 20 goals games then.
Was the commentary bad? I thought it was pretty decent. Enjoyed Jonathan Brown having a more prominent role, and it was clear he'd done his homework on his subject matter of expertise (the forward line), was well educated on all our forwards, even Georgiades.Few positive signs of improvement today but a lot of familiar signs too with the fumbles in close and goal kicking.
Early days. As bad as the commentary was the one thing I agreed with is the first 3 rounds will say a lot about how the season may unfold.
Yeah but does Ken Hinkley see Marshall that way?I would love him to be pulling down marks and kicking goals, but you know who is doing that? His partner in crime.
Every time I see Marshall when we go forward, everyone is seeing him not mark it, you know what I’m seeing, I’m seeing his opponent, making zero play on the ball only trying to block Marshall.
Who was Marshall’s direct opponent? Cause I never saw him take 1 Mark in that 50.
Was there a loose back taking marks in front of Dixon and Marshall?
As far as I’m concerned Marshall could kick 0 goals for 2020, if we’re not giving up record breaking intercept marks that we were, and Dixon is monstering his opponent one out, then he’s doing his job. Anything on top of that is a bonus.
Until Dixon retires it’s his forward line and Marshall is a cog in a machine that works when he is there.
Was the commentary bad? I thought it was pretty decent. Enjoyed Jonathan Brown having a more prominent role, and it was clear he'd done his homework on his subject matter of expertise (the forward line), was well educated on all our forwards, even Georgiades.
Something else they'd done their research on was our horrible forward entry conversion.
If we kicked into the wind every game last year we'd have probably made finals, it actually forced us to move the ball forward thoughtfully rather than Hinkleyballing it long to the pocket every entry.
Can't believe how many people are falling for Dixon and especially Motlop. It's almost like we don't have 9 and 10 years respectively worth of evidence to suggest that these guys will as a matter of fact let us down when we actually need them to perform. Both of their games were largely meaningless to me.
Really happy with the form of Rozee, Butters and Duursma. All three look set to replicate what they were able to do last year. Butters may in fact take a big step - a second pre season looks to have done him the world of good, he looks noticeably stronger and fitter than last year.
Amon also continuing his form from last year. Very encouraging.
Georgiades has already gone past Marshall. He's raw but he actually competes and looks dangerous, unlike Marshall who increasingly looks unlikely to make it at the level.
The forward entries did show some lowering of the eyes not so much of the hail mary to the pockets.
i'm happy for him to be there but you have to ask yourself why isnt he getting more of the ball, i suspect its because he lacks work rate, i dont mean just covering the ground, i mean grinding out your opponent till you are free for the short lead, or you do get behind them in open space to score. About 60 percent of you possessions should come through pure work rate, we dont see that easy possession because he allows himself to be under the pump from the defender on his tail.Im a bit in that boat also, I like him and want him in the side come round 1 this year, but i want him to deserve to be in the side.
There is no doubt he has had a hard run, a very hard run, but going into his 4th year on the list its time to start showing us why his team mates and coaches have been raving about him and step us and show it at AFL level and not rely on other people telling us how good he is...SHOW US !
Or even at SANFL level when he's there, because if where honest he wasn't nearly as good as Billy at SANFL level last year.
That by no means means he shouldn't be allowed to have quite patches (because of course he will) and shouldn't be persisted with in between (because he should) but he needs to show us how good he can be. He has the U23 game and Marsh game 2 to make up for today and demand Round 1 selection, going of todays game you couldn't say he deserves to play round 1.
They are facts, clearly we are better with a second key forward. Without question we cant rely on Dixon being the only target, but over the years how many times did others get that opportunity ? Billy for example (given he was clearly the much better key forward at SANFL level last year) ?
This year Marshall has Georgiadies competing for the same spot, today he attacked the ball in the air far harder then Marshall did and found more of the ball from less time on ground.
Marshall needs to prove they we are better off with him in the side then Georgiadies and/or a second ruck.
Ok yeah his knowledge is clearly limited to key tallsJB also said Sam Gray was still part of our forward line so not sure how much homework he did!
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Was the commentary bad? I thought it was pretty decent. Enjoyed Jonathan Brown having a more prominent role, and it was clear he'd done his homework on his subject matter of expertise (the forward line), was well educated on all our forwards, even Georgiades.
Something else they'd done their research on was our horrible forward entry conversion.
If we kicked into the wind every game last year we'd have probably made finals, it actually forced us to move the ball forward thoughtfully rather than Hinkleyballing it long to the pocket every entry.
I think it's reasonable that they had a focus on the season ahead and reviewing some of what happened the season before.As pointed out not Riccuito or Dermie levels, but could tell they had little interest in the game itself and had pregame points they wanted to cover. Felt like they had a job of trying to sell some belief for 2020. As a result often got the free wrong despite umps being miked up, calling Ebert Dixon made me laugh but not as much as the Sam Gray reference.
Given we follow Ports a lot closer than them I suppose I’m expecting too much.
As pointed out not Riccuito or Dermie levels, but could tell they had little interest in the game itself and had pregame points they wanted to cover. Felt like they had a job of trying to sell some belief for 2020. As a result often got the free wrong despite umps being miked up, calling Ebert Dixon made me laugh but not as much as the Sam Gray reference.
Given we follow Ports a lot closer than them I suppose I’m expecting too much.
It was horrendous, they even called Ebert, Dixon when he was lining up.Was the commentary bad? I thought it was pretty decent. Enjoyed Jonathan Brown having a more prominent role, and it was clear he'd done his homework on his subject matter of expertise (the forward line), was well educated on all our forwards, even Georgiades.
Something else they'd done their research on was our horrible forward entry conversion.
If we kicked into the wind every game last year we'd have probably made finals, it actually forced us to move the ball forward thoughtfully rather than Hinkleyballing it long to the pocket every entry.