If what you're getting at is the 50 point Total Team Points cap is too high, I agree.The points should be set at about 32
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If what you're getting at is the 50 point Total Team Points cap is too high, I agree.The points should be set at about 32
You'll never compete with the Old Boys clubs if they reduce the cap, it's not the answer. The answer is you blokes stop playing blokes you've been playing for 10 years and play some kids. Stop blaming the system, we all play within the confines of it, some just do it better.That's it, more relevant to suburban footy though, but there has to be something across the board
Your got your head up your arse again,. Big schools like yours with their networks can offer jobs and other incentives, that's your luckYou'll never compete with the Old Boys clubs if they reduce the cap, it's not the answer. The answer is you blokes stop playing blokes you've been playing for 10 years and play some kids. Stop blaming the system, we all play within the confines of it, some just do it better.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
To put it a little less colourfullyYour got your head up your arse again,. Big schools like yours with their networks can offer jobs and other incentives, that's your luck
Quite clearly you need to read the rules. A 'home' player is valued at 1 point. My club currently has 34 'home' players at VFL and AFL level, I guarantee you that you don't have even 10 players.Your got your head up your arse again,. Big schools like yours with their networks can offer jobs and other incentives, that's your luck
Quite clearly you need to read the rules. A 'home' player is valued at 1 point. My club currently has 34 'home' players at VFL and AFL level, I guarantee you that you don't have even 10 players.
I'll happily have the cap at 32 points, your club would not get within 40 goals of my club were those 34 AFL and VFL players to play under your proposed cut off. That's why 50 points is a good and reasonable number, you could recruit 5 AFL blokes and have 17 home grown fellows and then you are a serious club.
Comprehension obviously isn't a strong point of yours.Don't have 10, once again you have no idea, no wonder great posters like Scribe are not here anymore
Quite clearly you need to read the rules. A 'home' player is valued at 1 point. My club currently has 34 'home' players at VFL and AFL level, I guarantee you that you don't have even 10 players.
I'll happily have the cap at 32 points, your club would not get within 40 goals of my club were those 34 AFL and VFL players to play under your proposed cut off. That's why 50 points is a good and reasonable number, you could recruit 5 AFL blokes and have 17 home grown fellows and then you are a serious club.
The lesser the points, the stronger the Old Boys Clubs become. Funnily enough, the points were only implemented at VAFA level to stop the raping of our higher level grades from other leagues. The points system has thing to do with trying to even up the competition.
If what you're getting at is the 50 point Total Team Points cap is too high, I agree.
SKOB to win it.
Bail, Strauss, Gysberts, Gilham, Solopek all playing and will continue to.
Spring heeled Williams is a gun. Lynch, Gleeson, Jones, Wood...
List goes on and on.
Maplebet may need to close after this season.
FWIW I would like to wish all VAFA clubs without direct junior feeder clubs all the best in D3 & D4 for the rest of their club's history. 32 points would give these teams absolute no chance of having any future progression. Is that what we want?
That last spot down is a raffle!Pressure rising at OX's..............
Bold prediction......Bernies to follow OC. down....
Where did I say 32 points? I said I agree 50 points was too high.FWIW I would like to wish all VAFA clubs without direct junior feeder clubs all the best in D3 & D4 for the rest of their club's history. 32 points would give these teams absolute no chance of having any future progression. Is that what we want?
Where did I say 32 points? I said I agree 50 points was too high.
The MPNFL had been (may still be) operating on 39 points for years. The rich, powerful and influential clubs have coped and remained successful. And it's allowed the less affluent clubs to become competitive, even snag a flag here and there. It's made for a much better competition.
I'm for clubs who develop from within in preference to those who take the line of least resistance and go the buy-in route.
See Max “You are a star” Leader's post which addressed some of your other stuff.
Come on Max, some of the greatest players in OI history have been ring in's, and good on them I say. Big Hayden Hetta, what a star! Matt Ferguson, Chris Johnson et al, there's some great names there.What's the obsession with A or B grade.
In 2025, when both St. Bernards and West Brunswick celebrate their 10 year Premiership Reunion, you can't tell me the boys from WB won't be enjoying that day as much and the boys from St.B.
A premiership is a premiership regardless of the grades. The feel around the lower grades is far superior to that of some of the A Grade Teams.
Its about playing football and enjoying your mates, regardless of the level you play at.
Max "22 points" Leader
As was my point about 34 AFL and VFL players, who are all one pointers if they ever play for us. Reducing the points cap would kill local clubs, surely that's obvious?FWIW I think you guys are missing my point. The clubs without juniors have no other option but to go the "buy in" route. Think Albert Park, West Brunswick, NOBS, Powerhouse etc. By reducing the cap it will make it nearly impossible for these clubs to ever climb the grades against other clubs with stronger feeders (I never mentioned A or B). The overarching level playing field is that no one gets paid and it should stay that way.
Come on Max, some of the greatest players in OI history have been ring in's, and good on them I say. Big Hayden Hetta, what a star! Matt Ferguson, Chris Johnson et al, there's some great names there.
FWIW I think you guys are missing my point. The clubs without juniors have no other option but to go the "buy in" route. Think Albert Park, West Brunswick, NOBS, Powerhouse etc. By reducing the cap it will make it nearly impossible for these clubs to ever climb the grades against other clubs with stronger feeders (I never mentioned A or B). The overarching level playing field is that no one gets paid and it should stay that way.
Don't upset Fitzy on herePressure rising at OX's..............
Bold prediction......Bernies to follow OC. down....
As was my point about 34 AFL and VFL players, who are all one pointers if they ever play for us. Reducing the points cap would kill local clubs, surely that's obvious?
You have 34 AFL/VFL players that would be 1 pointers yet you had 40 points run out for you on Saturday?
I'd hazard a guess and say OX and SKOBs had the 2 highest player points across the 7 divisions on Saturday.
Not sure how reducing it would kill "local" clubs if the two clubs with arguably the two best feeder schools in the state are also the highest ranked in player points ontop of it. Not be mention the 34 AFL/VFL players that would be 1 pointers of course.
I guess I shouldn't then raise the point that with access to that much talent (34 AFL/VFL players that would be 1 pointers and 40 points worth of players), hovering in B grade for so many years and barely giving a whimper in A grade so far this year, it is a little underwhelming.
Your argument might be valid if these local clubs had 40+ points running around but I don't think this is the case is it?