- Thread starter
- #176
All very valid points you raise Les. I am certainly not a fan of clubs self-nominating and my default position is it should not occur but I guess Parkdale did declare their issues a long way out. I think we will see more of this going forward. Perhaps if a club can substantially justify the reasons and then only if another club is prepared to voluntarily replace them it could be considered with certain conditions - e.g. minimum 2 years in the grade, lose points etc. Different times requires some lateral thinking and I just know that that next week 22 blokes from my club miss out on a game. I also have some sympathy for the Parkdale stalwarts and players who had the guts to stick it out.No. I get the fact it’s not a good look but we can’t start allowing sides to determine their preferred grade. You play in the grade you’re in and some years that’s going to be tough. This years situation reflects on Parkdale FC, not on the competition.
Easier for school, uni and district clubs with a junior feeder. As the quality and numbers might vary from season to season, generally we at least have a regular supply of players coming through. Parkdale don’t have any of that. I very much doubt they would challenge in C grade but at least they might have remained competitive and induced a few more players to answer the call to arms.
I must say I was a bit surprised that all the clubs invited to come up declined but understand the reasons. Either way I don’t think we will see them in VAFA next years they seem almost certain to join the SFL.