Remove this Banner Ad

Premiership Coach 2011

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Hannath too high from Freo, A.Pearce too low. Walters and Hill probably a bit low for me, Sheridan could do with an extra point or two.
 
Assuming this is Overall not Peek. My rule of thumb would be:
Elite/Top Players (Fyfe, Franklin, Ablett, Selwood et al) Mid 80s-90s
Best 22 players (K.Jack, Dal Santo, LeCras et al) High 70s-Mid/High 80s (depending on position and team)
Fringe players Low 70s-Low 80s

For the Swans at least:
Tippett would be mid 80s, B.Jack would be mid 70s, Jones, Lloyd and Cunningham could all do with a few more as well, Nank is more of a forward 2nd ruck, Naismith is a better ruckman if that will influence you at all (I'd say Naismith > Nank), X.Richards would be low 70s. I think that would be a bit more accurate based on my "model" above
 
Millky95 said:
Assuming this is Overall not Peek. My rule of thumb would be:
Elite/Top Players (Fyfe, Franklin, Ablett, Selwood et al) Mid 80s-90s
Best 22 players (K.Jack, Dal Santo, LeCras et al) High 70s-Mid/High 80s (depending on position and team)
Fringe players Low 70s-Low 80s

For the Swans at least:
Tippett would be mid 80s, B.Jack would be mid 70s, Jones, Lloyd and Cunningham could all do with a few more as well, Nank is more of a forward 2nd ruck, Naismith is a better ruckman if that will influence you at all (I'd say Naismith > Nank), X.Richards would be low 70s. I think that would be a bit more accurate based on my "model" above
Click to expand...
this is overall - we have Tippett as a ruck cos obviously you would want Reid playing over Nank/Naismith if you dont play as the swans. as i said, my friends and I are making these, if i had my way i would put Tippett about 83/84

Edit - would you have put Nankervis as a TF rather than Ruck, and Naismith would be 71/72?
Cunningham is 73 because he is OP on this game - according to one of friends, all have input in this so we have to compromise a bit with our ratings
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

MrCricket1009 said:
this is overall - we have Tippett as a ruck cos obviously you would want Reid playing over Nank/Naismith if you dont play as the swans. as i said, my friends and I are making these, if i had my way i would put Tippett about 83/84
Click to expand...
Sinclair would be our number 1 ruck choice. Tippett would be the FF and as a FF, is easily 85. Reid is just unlucky of game mechanics as the game will pick Naismith over Reid due to being a proper ruck. If your friends disagree, fair enough. But you have the support of a random on the internet :p
 
Millky95 said:
Sinclair would be our number 1 ruck choice. Tippett would be the FF and as a FF, is easily 85. Reid is just unlucky of game mechanics as the game will pick Naismith over Reid due to being a proper ruck. If your friends disagree, fair enough. But you have the support of a random on the internet :p
Click to expand...
thanks - my friends want Tippett to be a fwd not a ruck - i personally think that he plays better as a ruck than as a fwd that is why he is a ruck ATM.... probs will change tho.... Thanks always nice to know someone has my back:p;)
 
MrCricket1009 said:
thanks - my friends want Tippett to be a fwd not a ruck - i personally think that he plays better as a ruck than as a fwd that is why he is a ruck ATM.... probs will change tho.... Thanks always nice to know someone has my back:p;)
Click to expand...
He is a forward who should pinch hit in the ruck. Sadly we just had no other options late in the season... but forward is where he should stay
 
Millky95 said:
For the Swans at least:
Tippett would be mid 80s, B.Jack would be mid 70s, Jones, Lloyd and Cunningham could all do with a few more as well, Nank is more of a forward 2nd ruck, Naismith is a better ruckman if that will influence you at all (I'd say Naismith > Nank), X.Richards would be low 70s. I think that would be a bit more accurate based on my "model" above
Click to expand...
Agree with all of these changes, especially Tippett who I think is rated far too low. I'd probably downgrade Ted Richards a bit to the high 70s.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

with the peaks, we currently have 3 players on 100 peaks (Fyfe, Hogan and Wingard). is that not enough and who else should be 100 peak?

EDIT: much to the disapproval of one of my friends, who doesnt want any 100 peaks! which is stupid!
 
Last edited:
MrCricket1009 said:
ok thanks, so should we move Nankervis into the TF category or keep him as a ruckman with equal fwd skill?
Click to expand...
Ruckman with equal forward skill. Nank will go into the pocket and be more a 3rd tall option when Naismith is the main ruck
MrCricket1009 said:
with the peaks, we currently have 3 players on 100 peaks (Fyfe, Hogan and Wingard). is that not enough and who else should be 100 peak?
Click to expand...
Might be biased but Heeney should peek high 90s if not 100. Those 3 I would agree with though. No more than those 4 would be close to peeking at 100 due to age
 
Millky95 said:
Ruckman with equal forward skill. Nank will go into the pocket and be more a 3rd tall option when Naismith is the main ruck

Might be biased but Heeney should peek high 90s if not 100. Those 3 I would agree with though. No more than those 4 would be close to peeking at 100 due to age
Click to expand...
we currently have Heeeeeeney at 79/96, peak probs should be higher IMO maybe 98/99 cos Brayshaw has 98 peak and McCartin and Petracca 96
 
[
MrCricket1009 said:
with the peaks, we currently have 3 players on 100 peaks (Fyfe, Hogan and Wingard). is that not enough and who else should be 100 peak?
Click to expand...
Maybe Bont? Or if not 100 in the high 90s.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

MrCricket1009 said:
we currently have Heeeeeeney at 79/96, peak probs should be higher IMO maybe 98/99 cos Brayshaw has 98 peak and McCartin and Petracca 96
Click to expand...
Yeah I'd match him with Brayshaw. Heeney was supposed to be number 2 in the draft that year
 
MrCricket1009 said:
Hey guys,
my friends and I are working on some 2016 lists and would like your input to our preliminary ratings
Feedback is welcome and we are aiming to have these done by late Dec/Early Jan
Click to expand...

Thanks for the 2015 lists you posted ages ago, those are the ones I've been using and I'm 99% sure that was you.

Don't think Armitage is a 94. He's rated better than Pendlebury, Martin, Cotchin, Sloane, Selwood and Beams. I think he's more an 89 or lower, not on the level of some of those players I mentioned.
 
MrCricket1009 said:
we currently have Heeeeeeney at 79/96, peak probs should be higher IMO maybe 98/99 cos Brayshaw has 98 peak and McCartin and Petracca 96
Click to expand...
Wouldn't say Wingard is a 100 peak, more a 93-96, but that might be hard to get through to you ;) . Surely Patrick Cripps has got to have one of the best ones after this season.
 
AngryRanga said:
Thanks for the 2015 lists you posted ages ago, those are the ones I've been using and I'm 99% sure that was you.

Don't think Armitage is a 94. He's rated better than Pendlebury, Martin, Cotchin, Sloane, Selwood and Beams. I think he's more an 89 or lower, not on the level of some of those players I mentioned.
Click to expand...
we have moved him down to 92 - i would want him lower but got to compromise with friends.....:( - got to remember these are the preliminary ratings and things will be changed - obviously if there is anything else we should or u think we could change please comment. All input in welcome - we are making these for you - so it be a bit unfair to leave you guys out of the discussion
I did make those '15 lists, but got to credit Grockadoc and i think haydo169 for actually making them - i just edited them a bit
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Premiership Coach 2011

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top