- Banned
- #351
What things did they say about Avi weren't verifiable facts?
At this point they are calling Avi's bluff and want him to try and sue for defamation.
They didn’t. That’s not what I said.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What things did they say about Avi weren't verifiable facts?
At this point they are calling Avi's bluff and want him to try and sue for defamation.
yepI wonder how this impacts Avi's fundraising model.
Will the dumb campaigners who believe his s**t keep forking over?
i LOVE that they have put every other photo under the sun in the article other than the one of Maluta's actual face because of the watermark hahahah.User behind pro-Labor Twitter account PRGuy publicly reveals identity
The Age spoke on the phone with Jeremy Maluta, who gained a significant Twitter following for his support of Premier Daniel Andrews during the pandemic, and confirmed he was the user of the account.www.theage.com.au
View attachment 1431451
lol.I think there’s a bit to play out in this fight yet. I wouldn’t be celebrating early.
Defo for PRGuy calling him a wife basher or somethingWHat exactly is Yemeni sued him for?
One prominent YTer has accused Yemeni of being a drug dealer in his teens, no defamation suit there.
I think there’s a bit to play out in this fight yet. I wouldn’t be celebrating early.
It's hilarious, well playedMeans Avi, the Murdoch media and all the other conspiracy BS clowns can only use the image/video of Jeremy outing himself if they post the watermark with it. It's very clever!
He is a wife basher.Defo for PRGuy calling him a wife basher or something
I think it’s the “or something”.Defo for PRGuy calling him a wife basher or something
Why would you spend the last year or so shilling for such an awful premier like Dan Andrews if you don't even work for him? I mean it would have been better if he did have some connection to Dan. But there's something so pathetic and weird that he dedicated so much time to someone like Dan Andrews.
Avi is a loser of course, and anyone who listens to him.
I think it’s the “or something”.
I vaguely recall it’s to do with “Nazi sympathiser” or something like that. May even have been more direct.