- Banned
- #101
Priddis isn't a liability individually, the whole midfield is a liability. All of them have various strengths making their claims to a midfield spot tenable. However as a collective for the last 3 years they haven't been good enough.
Priddis would slip into Collingwood's midfield (replacing Luke Ball) and they wouldn't notice much difference. He'd slot into Freo's midfield replacing Mick Barlow.
The problem is Priddis is our chief banana. That isn't his fault mind you. But a midfield with Priddis as the main midfielder isn't going to be elite.
He should be second string, like Ball is at Collingwood. The guy that comes on and wins clearances and keeps the midfield ticking over whilst the others get a rest. To do that he needs to make himself useful forward of centre when not playing guts.
We have too many forwards/backs who can't run through the guys meaning our midfielders have to shoulder the burden for the entire game.
Take Collingwood as an example, Ball/Swan/Sidebottom/Beams/Blair all spend time in the forward line. About the only one who doesn't is pendlebury.
How often do we see Kerr/Shuey/Priddis/Gaff/Selwood resting forward nowadays? Doesn't happen. Part of the reason is that Lecras, hill, darling can't take over.
Our midfield is a major issue, however it's not just the 6-8 blokes who get the most midfield time, nor is it just Priddis.
Good post which echoes the sentiments of many I reckon.
That said, who is changing things? Woosh ain't, so it seems our only chance of resolution starts with changing Woosh.



