Re: Proof 911 was an Inside Job?
There was so much argument from other nations not to go to war in Afghanistan and Iraq.... the US needed a BIG reason and they had one... and then made up a few more etc...
So instead the newly elected Bush administration implements the greatest and most elaborate hoax in history. A hoax involving possibly hundreds of unnamed people and requiring absolute discretion from all levels - government employees, the illusive demolition team, NYFD, NYPD . . . families of the alleged victims, even the victims themselves. All EXCEPT Larry Silverstein himself who is apparently allowed to give random interviews unchecked, dropping subtle hints in TV interviews about the deception he is supposedly reaping a huge windfall from.
If you were going to do this, would you do it this way?’ There are cheaper, better, easier and safer ways to get into a war. These almost omniscient government conspirators use a ridiculously complex plan that has the after effect of crashing not only the US airline industry but impacts every other nations as well, damages national financial markets at a time when cash is most needed in the gearing up for war, destroy very very valuable property yet have the owner of said property publicly admit the fraud the next day, panic the WORLD, kill your own citizens etc. Then blame it on Osama Bin Laden even though the goal is to invade Iraq to which Bin Laden has no ties whatsoever.
Why pick Osama as the fall guy if the target is Hussein. Why not just pick Saddam and ‘plant’ evidence to show it was him all along, thereby never needing to go to Afghanistan at all. After all if you can plan the attack why not the culprit . . . no need to go scratching for evidence of a link to Iraq AFTER the attack when you have all the opportunity and resources to set it up before.
Why the need to go to war anyway, to lower oil prices? Wow that worked out well didn't it. Create world instability and then compound that into the oil fields of the middle east, specifically Iraq - who supply less than 1% of US energy anyway. I have no idea why the markets wouldn't have reacted positively to this??
Finally, couldn't all this have been achieved by a ‘foiled’ plot. ie Terrorists were 15 minutes from the murder of thousands … a president that was already fairly unpopular would certainly come out better having stopped an attack than permitting one. Or if you needed a big attack why not just the anthrax that came after. Everyone panicking over any white powder. Far far easier to plant Anthrax or similar in the towers or Disneyland, have a panic, then capture your suspects who blow themselves up or whatever you want.
How can these conspirators be all powerful, all seeing, all knowing, and completely incompetent at the same time?