Re: Proof 911 was an Inside Job?
WTF????
So many things in the above post misrepresents what I’ve said. Is this a deliberate effort on your part to tear down my post without having to respond to the points raised? “Bawling out”, “pwn”??? What are you five years old?? That is possibly the most infantile thing you’ve written in a post that has much shaking of the fist and stomping of the foot without an actual argument being raised. But then why actually make an argument when you can simply pick apart someone elses. I thought this was a discussion, I didn’t realise that the whole object was to “pwn” your opponent! If the whole purpose is just to add another notch your belt then fine, go ahead - I’ll take solace in the fact that I’ve at least made an argument and put myself in the firing line.
Not wanting to turn this into a he said/she said thread but I must respond to your assertions. Firstly, I fail to see how I “backpedaled” as you so colourfully put it or make unsubstantiated claims. I responded to your request by posting a video which illustrates exactly what I had stated using a mathmatically and physically correct computer model that sourced substantiated and real evidence from the crash site as it’s data.
You then responded by saying nothing of the clip but questioning why it needed an explanation in the first place. Asserting that because the US Government hadn’t released anything clearer or more definitive then that was actually evidence of a cover up. Tacking on at the end an extract from a pseudo-trial that basically summed up your thinking.
My rebuttal continued with the mock trial allusion, updating it with my take on the situation (which I noticed in your response you’d made edits to - classy!!!). I’m sorry you found it insulting, however I won’t apologise for calling the ideology and speculation by the 911 truth movement “moronic and ignorant”. I then offered a response to your question with my thoughts as to why there hasn’t been higher quality footage of the crash at the Pentagon released and how it is possible that there isn’t. This was pure speculation on my part but as your question comes from your own unsupported assumption that there is better footage being suppressed I didn’t feel I should have to offer up any evidence. Where is your evidence that this suppressed footage exists? Show me the whistleblower who says they have seen it and know for a fact that it has been buried! You are positing that this is fact yet you have provided nothing to back this up. Show me the statements from nearby businesses alleging the confiscation of security footage showing the impact! The burden of proof is on you! Yet you posit an assumption, with no evidence, then demand evidence from my own speculation while completely dismissing what I already have provided (without actually saying why I might add, just that it had been “whipped up”!)
On the subject, if the dark overseers of the Bush admin can orchestrate 911 then surely it would be just a simple task to have a realistic video clip made up of flight 77 flying into the Pentagon. With all the tricks and omniscient intelligence they so obviously possess, I’m sure they could have got some computer graphics students, provided them with the latest software and an open budget with the only request - “make it look real”. It is incredible in fact that if this was indeed masterminded by inside sources with the immense resources they seemed to have that something like this hasn’t been released!
In my previous post it was quite clear that I was referring to the 911 truth movement, if you take offense at this I apologise but I was not pointing my criticism directly at you however, I maintain my right to hold in contempt adherents to this ridiculous ideology. It is offensive to the memories of those who died on September 11 2001; it is allowing the real perpetrators of these attacks to get off the hook, in some cases looking like innocent pawns caught in an impossible net of political idiocy; it is affording a ludicrously backwards, inefficient, bumbling and arrogant administration the mantle of political masterminds - to the extent never before seen in history; through the corruption of evidence and investigation it is allowing the shoe horning of a truly tragic event into an illegal war to go unchecked, the conspirators allowed retire in comfort without prosecution.
The story so far...
etc, etc, etc!
etc, etc, etc!
So many things in the above post misrepresents what I’ve said. Is this a deliberate effort on your part to tear down my post without having to respond to the points raised? “Bawling out”, “pwn”??? What are you five years old?? That is possibly the most infantile thing you’ve written in a post that has much shaking of the fist and stomping of the foot without an actual argument being raised. But then why actually make an argument when you can simply pick apart someone elses. I thought this was a discussion, I didn’t realise that the whole object was to “pwn” your opponent! If the whole purpose is just to add another notch your belt then fine, go ahead - I’ll take solace in the fact that I’ve at least made an argument and put myself in the firing line.
Not wanting to turn this into a he said/she said thread but I must respond to your assertions. Firstly, I fail to see how I “backpedaled” as you so colourfully put it or make unsubstantiated claims. I responded to your request by posting a video which illustrates exactly what I had stated using a mathmatically and physically correct computer model that sourced substantiated and real evidence from the crash site as it’s data.
You then responded by saying nothing of the clip but questioning why it needed an explanation in the first place. Asserting that because the US Government hadn’t released anything clearer or more definitive then that was actually evidence of a cover up. Tacking on at the end an extract from a pseudo-trial that basically summed up your thinking.
My rebuttal continued with the mock trial allusion, updating it with my take on the situation (which I noticed in your response you’d made edits to - classy!!!). I’m sorry you found it insulting, however I won’t apologise for calling the ideology and speculation by the 911 truth movement “moronic and ignorant”. I then offered a response to your question with my thoughts as to why there hasn’t been higher quality footage of the crash at the Pentagon released and how it is possible that there isn’t. This was pure speculation on my part but as your question comes from your own unsupported assumption that there is better footage being suppressed I didn’t feel I should have to offer up any evidence. Where is your evidence that this suppressed footage exists? Show me the whistleblower who says they have seen it and know for a fact that it has been buried! You are positing that this is fact yet you have provided nothing to back this up. Show me the statements from nearby businesses alleging the confiscation of security footage showing the impact! The burden of proof is on you! Yet you posit an assumption, with no evidence, then demand evidence from my own speculation while completely dismissing what I already have provided (without actually saying why I might add, just that it had been “whipped up”!)
On the subject, if the dark overseers of the Bush admin can orchestrate 911 then surely it would be just a simple task to have a realistic video clip made up of flight 77 flying into the Pentagon. With all the tricks and omniscient intelligence they so obviously possess, I’m sure they could have got some computer graphics students, provided them with the latest software and an open budget with the only request - “make it look real”. It is incredible in fact that if this was indeed masterminded by inside sources with the immense resources they seemed to have that something like this hasn’t been released!
In my previous post it was quite clear that I was referring to the 911 truth movement, if you take offense at this I apologise but I was not pointing my criticism directly at you however, I maintain my right to hold in contempt adherents to this ridiculous ideology. It is offensive to the memories of those who died on September 11 2001; it is allowing the real perpetrators of these attacks to get off the hook, in some cases looking like innocent pawns caught in an impossible net of political idiocy; it is affording a ludicrously backwards, inefficient, bumbling and arrogant administration the mantle of political masterminds - to the extent never before seen in history; through the corruption of evidence and investigation it is allowing the shoe horning of a truly tragic event into an illegal war to go unchecked, the conspirators allowed retire in comfort without prosecution.

