Re: Proof 911 was an Inside Job?
This is incredible nonsense. Apparently it is clearly a controlled demolition but because it is a controlled demolition it creates doubt in the minds of observers that it was a controlled demolition...? A drug-addled mind is a sad thing...
The original plan called for not many deaths even though they crashed four planes and destroyed or severely damaged four buildings... ?
Because your 'reasons' don't warrant rational argument. Those questions go to the heart of why your reasons are nonsense - your reasoning is just illogical and circular justifications for the Truther line of argument and like most of their arguments, have little basis in reality.
Clearly it's not "obvious", otherwise everyone would take it as self-evident, which they don't. This doubt is made possible by the controlled demolition and the control of a small site afterward ensures that any evidence of the demolition "disappears" along with the rest of the debris.
Concerned that they will cause more casualties than necessary, yes. If all you want to do is scare the living shit out of people, you don't need casualties, you need a spectacular event (like the collapse of a building) casualties are incidental and problematic, so why create more than you need to?
Do you understand "terror"?
Do you understand "terror"?
Be as flippant as you like Bloods, you asked for reasons for controlled demolitions and I've provided 3. How about you try to counter my reasons with rational argument rather than disingenuous questions?

