Re: Proof 911 was an Inside Job?
But as I explained in my previous post, the two issues are apples and oranges. Of course the military is coming down on him like a ton of bricks.
Before he has been found guilty of anything ... in fact, before he has even been charged with anything.
all it really tells us is that war is bad??!! What a scoop!!
And yet for this "non-scoop" he is being treated like the worst and most violent of the prisoners in the US detention system. In a manner that is widely recognised as a form of torture.
I say again, if this is how a "nuisance" is treated, I'd hate to see how any real threat might be treated!
Manning's motivation is completely irrelevant to the treatment he has received and the point I am making, so I won't address that.
I contend however, if someone were to come forward, like Colleen Rowley, with evidence to show government complicity to any degree in the 9/11 attacks they would indeed be regarded as a hero. Of course their claims would initially be regarded with skepticism, however, if they could back it up it would indeed lead to a serious investigation. However, this is all pie in the sky because at this point in time, after almost a decade, not a single, creditable whistleblower has come forward!
You seem to be straying from our argument here. I am referring to a cover-up of the controlled demolition of the towers, not government complicity in the act itself. Perhaps this misunderstanding explains your reactions.
But lets make it clear, skewing facts to protect ones own arse is slightly different to planning and executing greatest hoax of all time. Then to cover up so thoroughly that no indictable evidence of government complicity remains!
See my point above.
Yes I know we all look back to the atrocities of Vietnam and the lies of the Nixon Administration with warm feelings and a sense of nostalgia! Ah those were the days hey!!
It took one man working with the mainstream media to expose a corrupt, arrogant and out of control government!! They are all today celebrated as true national heroes!
Again you miss my point or choose to use a "Bloods" tactic of misrepresenting it for the purposes of ridicule.
I am saying that people of the ilk of Mark Felt are the ones that have gone missing. Scumbags like Nixon, Bush, Cheney etc have always existed. I thought my anecdote about my friend's regard for the integrity of Colin Powell would have made that clear.
So, just to spell out what I am saying.
I think the buildings were collapsed by controlled demolition (by whom is irrelevant) and I think the plane crashes were the ruse for that demolition.
I think that the people who have been complicit in denying this are either:
a) no closer to the actual facts or evidence than "truthers", or;
b) complying with requests from high-level government officials
Exactly how the government officials are convincing these folks (b) to help with the cover-up, I'm not sure, but given their justifications for other acts (many of which have been illegal - but still not "whistleblown") I suspect that the phrase "national security" has been liberally applied.