So the anti free speech government decides to waste more money, by leaning on the ABC to investigate itself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the episode was that bad. The usual LWNJs that watch Q&A wrote in to complain that even that episode, went even more full LWNJ * mode than usual.OK boomers.
Prototypical anti science death cultist.Wrong year thread I know, but how's the form of Jim Molan - "I'm not relying on evidence!"
Boy oh boy wowee
I’ll take it that you didn’t agree with what she believes in and so you decided have a melt.Did not know much about new Lib VIC MP Katie Allen until the latest Q&A.
Hypocritical bucket of s**t.
Its more about Coal companies and getting the Libs in power than farmersfu**s sake is mccormack REALLY the best the nats can throw up ??
* Looks at the rest of the nats *
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh , the bush really is f’ed hey.
Be interested to hear a bit more about this.MacDonald is very poor compared to Tony Jones.
McDonald is fine - so far he seems to recognize that it’s not about him.Be interested to hear a bit more about this.
The couple of episodes I have watched in the McDonald era, I have enjoyed a lot more than I used to. It has felt more like a facilitated discussion and less like an exercise in political pointscoring. More experts, less politicians, less loaded questions, less Tweets. They have however been ‘special episodes’ on the coronavirus and the economy so maybe that is the difference.
McDonald has seemed fine though. Tony Jones always rubbed me up the wrong way a bit. Too big a personality and ego for my liking.
Canavan and Fitzgibbon are both batting on the same team their only points of difference are on the edges while Steggall comes across as the rational one until we get to her edges.McDonald is fine - so far he seems to recognize that it’s not about him.
The way to avoid the political point scoring is to have fewer politicians on the panel. Take this episode:
Our Energy Future - Q+A
Panellists: Matt Canavan, Queensland Nationals Senator; Zali Steggall, Independent MP for Warringah; Joel Fitzgibbon, Shadow Minister for Agriculture and Resources; Zoe Whitton, Citi ESG analyst and Investor Group on Climate Change; and Sophia Hamblin Wang, sustainability entrepreneur.www.abc.net.au
Having Canavan and Fitzgibbon there is a waste of time. Steggall too. It’s ensuring that there will be conflict and no progress or interesting discussion.
Yeah, very hard to argue with what you've said. Tony Jones was more "old school" went hard at politicians and "experts" so I know where you're coming from. The young fella on there now has a more evn demeanour but still manages to extract information. I hope that if Q&A gets a bit more boisterous so to speak nearing election time that plitical forces don't do a hatchet job on it because it becomes just to uncomfortable. We need this type of thing I reckon.Be interested to hear a bit more about this.
The couple of episodes I have watched in the McDonald era, I have enjoyed a lot more than I used to. It has felt more like a facilitated discussion and less like an exercise in political pointscoring. More experts, less politicians, less loaded questions, less Tweets. They have however been ‘special episodes’ on the coronavirus and the economy so maybe that is the difference.
McDonald has seemed fine though. Tony Jones always rubbed me up the wrong way a bit. Too big a personality and ego for my liking.
Canavan and Fitzgibbon are both batting on the same team their only points of difference are on the edges while Steggall comes across as the rational one until we get to her edges.
She has slayed the dragon just like Maxine McKew before her then the crowd forget and revert to typeSteggall has 2 more years then will be gone. No matter how much limelight she gets.
She has slayed the dragon just like Maxine McKew before her then the crowd forget and revert to type
Jones to me seemed more balanced and also better at challenging people. I haven't actually watched it in months, not because of McDonald just forgotten about it a bit for a while. It's always been a very hit and miss show, just something that you record and for every crap or ordinary episode there will also be one well worth watching.Be interested to hear a bit more about this.
The couple of episodes I have watched in the McDonald era, I have enjoyed a lot more than I used to. It has felt more like a facilitated discussion and less like an exercise in political pointscoring. More experts, less politicians, less loaded questions, less Tweets. They have however been ‘special episodes’ on the coronavirus and the economy so maybe that is the difference.
McDonald has seemed fine though. Tony Jones always rubbed me up the wrong way a bit. Too big a personality and ego for my liking.
Why are right wing spokesmen so unpersonable? Who votes for such people ‘more edges than broken glass’ we used to say.
This is completely true of both parties. You get this right?They didn't get to where they are through talent or hard work. Their ninja-skills are confined to backstabbing and repaying favours to people that helped them backstab.