- Joined
- Jun 19, 2007
- Posts
- 41,498
- Reaction score
- 62,445
- Location
- On the south side now
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- nil
Absolutely notAll I have to say is, it's time to bring in a challenge system like in tennis. Each team gets 3 challenges a match and.. this might sound ridiculous...an umpire in the stands who communicates with the other umps and has a booming big brother voice via mic lol. The call is reviewed by all the umps, and they come to a consensus. I don't think anyone who is really interested in the fairness and integrity of the game can disagree.
the obsession with umpiring is out of control - and your suggestion is to make it even more of a spectacle.
Take the Sicily incident yesterday. You can argue whether it was a free kick or not but Tom Green DEFINITELY made a mistake by bumping instead of going for a tackle or smother. Absolutely NOBODY is talking about that error and it is way more significant.
The Max King error with the umpiring - St Kilda were open in the forward line anyway. Probably REDUCED their chances of kicking it by giving it to Max King for the sealer. The free kick did not decide the game. The free kick came at a time when the game was close so people notice it a lot more.
AFL media loves the umpriing talk because everyone froths over it and click on everything. At games now the fans cheer a free kick as loudly as they cheer a huge mark. Everyone is getting lured into an umpire obsession and it's ridiculous.
I honestly can't believe the AFL does a review and then tells the fans which decisions were right and wrong. How about- the umpires, like everyone else, are making split second decisions and they're going to get it wrong sometimes and you just have to accept it because it's not going to change the result of the game that is already finished.






