No, no it isn't.
Pedo is averaging a goal a game despite spending time in the ruck, Dawes isn't best 22. Dawes job is to kick goals and provide a target up forward and he does neither, he doesn't relief ruck either so I don't see how anybody can attempt to make a case for him being best 22 without bursting out into laughter.
Dawes is down on form and Pedo's best games this year have been better. No doubt.
As I said, I'm as frustrated as everyone with Dawes lack of ability to clunk an overhead/contested mark and impact the scoreboard - but Dawes is ahead in his career, and if both players were up and about, I would play Dawes first - marginally.
IF he was fit he probably would have but you can't keep using IF, you may as well say we're missing our first round pick from 2050 because he hasn't been born yet.
Until he's proven something like Brayshaw did at Casey even in the pre-season I don't see how you can use him as a missing best 22 player.
I'm sorry, I thought we were having a discussion about which of our best players are out of our lineup due to injury.
You think Petracca wouldnt be in our best 22 if it wasnt for injury? Ok Dez!.
His talent is best 22 but his talent is useless if he is slower than a turtle like we've seen recently, Trengove would have to prove himself again and wouldn't walk straight back into the best 22 until he's shown he isn't slow as hell.
I agree with everything you've said, but once again, the context of my comment was best 22 uninjured.
Trengove would be best 22 at Freo, Hawthorn or Sydney if injuries hadn't made him a turtle.
Personally, I dont think we'll ever see him again - but one can only hope.