Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It's still an assessment of the best players, not the team's performance.
They get humiliated by a lot moreAny assessment of best players that ignores the influence their performance has on the result is not worth the time and effort to undertake it. That's part of being the best players on the ground, you had to make a substantial contribution to the end result.
For as good as it looks on the stat sheet, you could subtract Zac Merritt out of that game and it does not change a thing result wise. Essendon still get humiliated, and Adelaide still runs up a defendable T20 total.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Merrett was BOG by a mile.That rating for Merrett is shocking. How did one coach not have him in the best 2 players on the ground?
I don’t like calling ANB an upgrade because it puts Smurph in a conversation he doesn’t belong in.Upgrade of the year!!
Well realistically he is an upgrade as he is a direct replacement.I don’t like calling ANB an upgrade because it puts Smurph in a conversation he doesn’t belong in.
Disagree, Dawson's impact per possession was way more impactful.Merrett was BOG by a mile.
Dons would have lost by 20 goal without him
Firstly depends on what team eg Horks only have one real tall KPF currently with a fleet of (ducking) smallsWould Nankervis be next in for quite a few of our defenders?
If Worrell, Hinge or Michalanney missed a game that's a pretty straightforward swap but would he also come in for Murray & Keane? With us getting players to play a bit taller.
Then perhaps not in for Milera or Laird as we seemingly want some more runner/ball winner types
I have to agree with thisHe's capable of kicking goals too but I wouldn't be spruiking it as a feature of his game. If Crouch is the man delivering the ball to our forwards, something went wrong.
I'm curious if Nicks or Scott gave Merrett 4 coaches votes (and it had to be a straight 4 based on the rest of the other votes).Disagree, Dawson's impact per possession was way more impactful.
Both coaches thought so too 10 votes.
The biggest win from my perspective is that Curtin, Peatling and Cumming can get some confidence and continuity while we're still winning games comfortably.
Watch these 3 guys come into their own later in the season.
Peatling especially when it gets scrappy through the winter months will be invaluable.
Without following the preseason too closely I wasn't that stoked about Milera getting the nod over Nankervis. I'm pleasantly surprised that's performed way better than I was expectingCould almost throw Milera into that group, he's doing better than last time back off a long lay off but he will keep improving whilst getting valuable match fitness.
A fit and firing Milera makes us a better side.
If we left Rankine on we would have won by more.There’s been lots of comments about allowing the bombers to score 100 points.
They were on 61 points at 3 quarter time and we were up by 10 goals at that point.
The foot had truly come off the accelerator in the last quarter yet we still managed to out score them in the last when they were trying to get something to cling to.
Seems like a whole bunch of nothing to me.
It could have been a 1/3 split.I'm curious if Nicks or Scott gave Merrett 4 coaches votes (and it had to be a straight 4 based on the rest of the other votes).
There's so much wrong with this reasoning. With 18 players, it's possible that you could play the best game ever played and your team still loses.Any assessment of best players that ignores the influence their performance has on the result is not worth the time and effort to undertake it. That's part of being the best players on the ground, you had to make a substantial contribution to the end result.
For as good as it looks on the stat sheet, you could subtract Zac Merritt out of that game and it does not change a thing result wise. Essendon still get humiliated, and Adelaide still runs up a defendable T20 total.
If we'd done something about Merret (kinda mean to tag their only performing player, but whatever) and Keane hadn't given away frees/fallen over/etc they'd have kicked 6 less too.If we left Rankine on we would have won by more.
We needed that 1st goal to settle us.Could almost throw Milera into that group, he's doing better than last time back off a long lay off but he will keep improving whilst getting valuable match fitness.
A fit and firing Milera makes us a better side.
Didn't need to, he wasn't having a dominant game by any means in the first three quarters.If we'd done something about Merret (kinda mean to tag their only performing player, but whatever) and Keane hadn't given away frees/fallen over/etc they'd have kicked 6 less too.
Crouch is not the main distributor.Dont mind Crouch the goalkicker
Dont mind Crouch the connector
But if he is the key distributor to our forwards then we are screwed
Dawson/ Draper but also Rankine/ Soligo/ Hinge too. Others are lowering their eyes and finding leading forwards eg Sholl, Rachele, Cumming, ANB, PeatlingI like Dawson and Draper setting it deep forward