- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Posts
- 10,332
- Reaction score
- 11,365
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- collingwood
- Thread starter
- #26
A few have mentioned the wide open spaces of Subi...and another has mentioned how the Dockers use the corridor.
Just a note on this....though Subi is huge....it is actually quite narrow.
We do enjoy playing the boundary...but at the G you have to go very very wide to do this. That's why I actually think we play the Dome alright...and why I think we'll go alright on Subi.
To play the boundary at Subi, you don't have to go too wide. It actually forces us to stay more central.
Dockers would have a high corridor use for this reason. If you play the G every week, you get sucked onto the wings. I remember reading an article from nathan buckley about playing on different grounds...and his statement was that you get sucked out onto the wings at the MCG.
But we will have to re-jig out zone. Instead of spreading so wide and flat....we'll have to spread a bit narrower and longer (if that makes sense)
Just a note on this....though Subi is huge....it is actually quite narrow.
We do enjoy playing the boundary...but at the G you have to go very very wide to do this. That's why I actually think we play the Dome alright...and why I think we'll go alright on Subi.
To play the boundary at Subi, you don't have to go too wide. It actually forces us to stay more central.
Dockers would have a high corridor use for this reason. If you play the G every week, you get sucked onto the wings. I remember reading an article from nathan buckley about playing on different grounds...and his statement was that you get sucked out onto the wings at the MCG.
But we will have to re-jig out zone. Instead of spreading so wide and flat....we'll have to spread a bit narrower and longer (if that makes sense)







