Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread Race for the flag, in squiggly lines

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

yes, but so could have 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013...
True. But if we remove all the ones that could have easily gone either way we are only left with attack dominant and balanced sides as premiers.

I'd be feeling quite excited if I were an Adelaide supporter right about now.
 
OK, bearing in mind this is NOT the ideal point, as discussed above, but just a centre of mass of premiers, it's at 74.0/69.4, which is right here:

9Dew5X1.jpg
Adelaide starting to stalk the centre like a shark preying on an injured seal. Cue Jaws music.
 
True. But if we remove all the ones that could have easily gone either way we are only left with attack dominant and balanced sides as premiers.

I'd be feeling quite excited if I were an Adelaide supporter right about now.

You obviously haven't met many BF crows supporters! Man, the pessimism is strong on our board.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I would love to know in how many simulations Melbourne makes the 8
Footy Maths do calculations like that every week. They have Melbourne on 0%.

Tower of Power agrees. I did 100,000 simulations and Melbourne didn't make the 8 in any of them. So that's 0.000%.

Edit: Wrong, see below.
 
Last edited:
Footy Maths do calculations like that every week. They have Melbourne on 0%.

Tower of Power agrees. I did 100,000 simulations and Melbourne didn't make the 8 in any of them. So that's 0.000%.
Odd considering that if Melbourne win and St Kilda and North lose they're in the box seat.
 
Footy Maths do calculations like that every week. They have Melbourne on 0%.

Tower of Power agrees. I did 100,000 simulations and Melbourne didn't make the 8 in any of them. So that's 0.000%.

I like those odds!
 
Footy Maths do calculations like that every week. They have Melbourne on 0%.

Tower of Power agrees. I did 100,000 simulations and Melbourne didn't make the 8 in any of them. So that's 0.000%.

MatterOfStats does a similar thing with a few different views. They have Melbourne at 0.3% of finishing 8th and 58.8% probability of finishing 11th. Roos are 74.4% probability of getting that last place. It has a great heat map. Almost every spot is set in stone besides 1-5.
 
It's a brave squiggle that is predicting West Coast to beat Hawthorn!

I dunno what the opposite of a "king maker" is, especially in the sporting context - but as a supporter, I'm going to enjoy watching my teams role as the "anti-king maker" over the next 3 weeks.

Can I ask about the flagpole? Why are there 10 teams who are still being given some (even a miniscule) premiership chance? Shouldn't those 10 teams all be equally at rock bottom of the flagpole?
Really?

upload_2016-8-10_14-10-35.jpeg
 
Can I ask about the flagpole? Why are there 10 teams who are still being given some (even a miniscule) premiership chance? Shouldn't those 10 teams all be equally at rock bottom of the flagpole?
Yes, and I will probably make next season's Flagpole do something like this. For now, though, it's purely a form rating, which doesn't care about ladder position at all.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Gahh, I'm sorry, I was looking at the wrong place, 7th instead of 8th. Tower of Power actually has Melbourne at 0.427% of making the 8 (427 out of 100,000 simulations).

I love those odds!
 
And here is the last 20 years of squiggle finishes, with 2016's teams highlighted in green.

Sydney really are one of the hardest teams to score against in the last 20 years, and Brisbane one of the easiest.

Essendon are close to "worse than Fitzroy" territory.

yehhu4H.jpg

Essendon and Brisbane are also in worse positions than every team to ever receive a Priority Pick. But they're in better positions than three teams that didn't: GWS 2012/13 and Melbourne 2013.
Is there a way to tell:

Out of all the teams that finished with a greater than 70 attack rating, how many went on to win the flag.

Out of all the teams that finished with a greater than 70 defence rating, how many went on to win the flag.
 
And here is the last 20 years of squiggle finishes, with 2016's teams highlighted in green.

Sydney really are one of the hardest teams to score against in the last 20 years, and Brisbane one of the easiest.

Essendon are close to "worse than Fitzroy" territory.

yehhu4H.jpg

Essendon and Brisbane are also in worse positions than every team to ever receive a Priority Pick. But they're in better positions than three teams that didn't: GWS 2012/13 and Melbourne 2013.

Are you able to somehow add in what the years are?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If you subscribe to the Many-Worlds Hypothesis, which says that an infinite array of parallel worlds exist, representing all possibilities, then it's not just a chance: Melbourne will definitely make finals! There's just a low chance of us happening to exist in that world.

About the same chance as conceiving quadruplets naturally.
 
About the same chance as conceiving quadruplets naturally.
Other things that are possible but less likely than Melbourne making finals:
  • Bulldogs finish top (0.002%)
  • Bulldogs miss finals (0.002%)
  • West Coast finish top (0.009%)
  • Melbourne lose all remaining games while Gold Coast hand out a series of spankings that allow them to overtake the Demons on percentage (0.001%)
  • Ninthmond (0.016%)
  • St Kilda finish 7th (0.001%)
  • Carlton replace Fremantle in the bottom 3 (0.030%).
 
OK, bearing in mind this is NOT the ideal point, as discussed above, but just a centre of mass of premiers, it's at 74.0/69.4, which is right here:

9Dew5X1.jpg

Thanks, exactly what I was getting at.

How about extending the spot to something like my attached image, be interesting to see how many premiers fit into the circle / oblong or whatever shape it may be over the last few decades.

Edit: like an archery board
_20160812_180144.JPG
..
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread Race for the flag, in squiggly lines

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top