Remove this Banner Ad

Discussion Random Chat MegaThread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
NM Design said:
Do it.
giraffepopcorn.gif
Click to expand...
Okay... :D
What did the chicken say when he was getting fried.
Hey, I'm getting fried.
Bazinga.
 
Not sure where it was posted (I think this thread, but not going thru 11607 posts to find it), but someone pointed out that AFL merchandise had certain rules attached for players signing jumpers, or something along those lines. (I believe the point was to see that people weren't buying 50 signed jumpers for resale, and/or that non-AFL licensed merchandise wasn't being used, etc.)

Anyway, I just saw this:
Memorabilia deals probed

It is understood the AFL had considered suspending some of the bigger offenders.

Some players are expected to receive significant fines, while others will escape with suspended fines.

The AFL has become incensed that the sports memorabilia market has been flooded with non-AFL endorsed items, and is looking into all potential endorsement of players of unauthorised memorabilia and merchandise.

The identification of the players is a consequence of successful legal action recently taken by the AFL against an unlicensed memorabilia seller.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/151396/default.aspx
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The thing is i think lots of players may do it. Its going to get interesting.
What would happen is player A would recieve a $$$ payment to sign for example 100 boots.

As part of afl rules a player can not sign anything that is not offically endorsed that a 3rd party has requested them sign for profit.
 
Crows have "given up" their first two picks.
The Adelaide Football Club has withdrawn its first two selections of tomorrow’s 2012 NAB National Draft as a gesture of goodwill towards resolving the Tippett matter.

Chairman Rob Chapman described it as a common-sense initiative that is in the Club’s overall best interests.

It would result in Adelaide having picks 62, 81 and 95 in tomorrow's draft.
Click to expand...
http://www.afc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/4417/newsid/151449/default.aspx
 
TheDoctor11 said:
Not happy about it, but it does make sense.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it might lessen the blows..? They seem fairly guilty about it. Good on them for not trying to lie and say they didn't do it. :thumbsu:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Nick said:
I'm sure your exams aren't that important. inb4agediscriminationbecauseim16andmyexamsarentworthshit
Click to expand...
It's just the overall pressure to do well by parents and teachers. My school is really strict academically. If anyone gets more than 3 D's they are put on review in year 10.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

NM Design said:
It's just the overall pressure to do well by parents and teachers. My school is really strict academically. If anyone gets more than 3 D's they are put on review in year 10.
Click to expand...
Shight.
Our school is much more lenient compared to that..
But I wouldn't really know exactly what they do for people who get straight D's (or something like that), because I've never got under a C. :cool:
 
Andonis1997 said:
I've never got under a C. :cool:
Click to expand...

It's a strange thing, but once you finish school and move to university or other tertiary education, you are looking for C's or D's but still avoiding F's.

With that being said, in my current course I am on a D average. :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Gibbsy
    • Like
Resource Random clash/promo jumper articles of years gone by
Replies
14
Views
1K
Royces Hart
Royces Hart

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom