Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread: Episode III

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That’s pretty moving, but nothing will stop the international arms race. It sucks but it’s the truth.
Those Japanese citizens were constantly asked to leave but pride made them stay. Even when Allied planes flew over and dropped letters telling them to get out before they were bombed, they chose to stay. War is awful and brutal. To win a country needs to be the most awful and brutal.

If the major Powers stopped advancing their weapons capabilities, then they lose their spot in the food chain.

Unlike WW1, where the conditions left no other option but WW2, I feel like after ww2, the people that pull the strings learned that another war on that scale would destroy everybody’s economy.

There's always the option for no war.

Nah, you're right to an extent Val, in that we're a species who continually operates from a base of fear, but I do feel that we'd been heading towards a bit of a paradigm shift with graft like the Iran nuclear deal, as tenuous as it may have been. I don't feel that Rouhani, or Putin, or Xi, or even Kim Jon want any part of a nuclear war. Neither does Trump, but he's enough of an imbecile and egomaniac to throw the toys out of the cot on the Iran deal, and no amount of photo-ops with Kim will make up for that.

I live in constant hope that we can change. But we've got to shift our paradigm out of fear and in to love. But to do that takes trust. And trust takes time. And I worry that we just don't have enough time. As it stands now, it's climate change that's either going to kill us or help us to love one another a bit more. I don't think it'll be nuclear war.

And yeah, I know that I sound melodramatic when I go on like this. But it's truly how I feel. Our paradigm must shift away from the pissing contests of ego-driven fools, and the myth that the economy is the be all and end all to our existence. We won't survive if it doesn't.
 
You’re being facetious aren’t you?

I was when I typed it but on reflection...

He shot up a building with an assault rifle in uptown Washington. Two years earlier a 12 year old kid was shot in a park for playing with a toy gun. That kid was black and was shot before the cops' vehicle even stopped. This bloke was surrounded by coppers after shooting up a building with an AR-15.

im-dreaming-of-a-white-privilege-christmas-5de2a1e053d9-1-47f527.jpeg
im-dreaming-of-a-white-privilege-christmas-5de2a1e053d9-2-4d411e.jpeg

im-dreaming-of-a-white-privilege-christmas-5de2a1e053d9-3-acc8ce.jpeg
im-dreaming-of-a-white-privilege-christmas-5de2a1e053d9-4-56615e.jpeg

im-dreaming-of-a-white-privilege-christmas-5de2a1e053d9-5-26c625.jpeg
im-dreaming-of-a-white-privilege-christmas-5de2a1e053d9-6-95d9fc.jpeg
 
There's always the option for no war.

Nah, you're right to an extent Val, in that we're a species who continually operates from a base of fear, but I do feel that we'd been heading towards a bit of a paradigm shift with graft like the Iran nuclear deal, as tenuous as it may have been. I don't feel that Rouhani, or Putin, or Xi, or even Kim Jon want any part of a nuclear war. Neither does Trump, but he's enough of an imbecile and egomaniac to throw the toys out of the cot on the Iran deal, and no amount of photo-ops with Kim will make up for that.

I live in constant hope that we can change. But we've got to shift our paradigm out of fear and in to love. But to do that takes trust. And trust takes time. And I worry that we just don't have enough time. As it stands now, it's climate change that's either going to kill us or help us to love one another a bit more. I don't think it'll be nuclear war.

And yeah, I know that I sound melodramatic when I go on like this. But it's truly how I feel. Our paradigm must shift away from the pi**ing contests of ego-driven fools, and the myth that the economy is the be all and end all to our existence. We won't survive if it doesn't.

Modern human societies promote pyschopaths. Its a systemic flaw in large societies. As soon as you can fake empathy you can con people. And once a society is large enough that everyone doesn't actually know everyone else day to day, week to week for their whole lives then empathy is relatively easy to fake. especially now we have modern media. Provided you keep it together in public and aren't actually photographed with gnawing on random children's limbs you'll probably be okay.

But modern societies also seem to have a large proportion of narcissists in power. I dunno what that means for nuclear war.

I don't think we have a sense of duty or committment to others any more. Once upon a time that was a staple of peoples politics whatever "side" they were on.
 
It matters for those that are interested in wider trends, but I tend to agree.

When you starting comparing global body counts of shootings and political violence as some point scoring exercise against your opponents, then you have to start questioning your own morality.

I’d hope whoever is studying the trends is looking past the political views & allegiances.
Most of these people are pathetic losers full of self loathing. Spose with the internet it’s easier for them to find each other and create echo chambers where they radicalise each other further.

There's always the option for no war.

Nah, you're right to an extent Val, in that we're a species who continually operates from a base of fear, but I do feel that we'd been heading towards a bit of a paradigm shift with graft like the Iran nuclear deal, as tenuous as it may have been. I don't feel that Rouhani, or Putin, or Xi, or even Kim Jon want any part of a nuclear war. Neither does Trump, but he's enough of an imbecile and egomaniac to throw the toys out of the cot on the Iran deal, and no amount of photo-ops with Kim will make up for that.

I live in constant hope that we can change. But we've got to shift our paradigm out of fear and in to love. But to do that takes trust. And trust takes time. And I worry that we just don't have enough time. As it stands now, it's climate change that's either going to kill us or help us to love one another a bit more. I don't think it'll be nuclear war.

And yeah, I know that I sound melodramatic when I go on like this. But it's truly how I feel. Our paradigm must shift away from the pi**ing contests of ego-driven fools, and the myth that the economy is the be all and end all to our existence. We won't survive if it doesn't.

It’s an interesting question, what will get us first? Nuclear winter or climate change? I don’t trust humanity to prevent either
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I’d hope whoever is studying the trends is looking past the political views & allegiances.
Most of these people are pathetic losers full of self loathing. Spose with the internet it’s easier for them to find each other and create echo chambers where they radicalise each other further.



It’s an interesting question, what will get us first? Nuclear winter or climate change? I don’t trust humanity to prevent either

Why can't we have both. They'll cancel each other out and the population should fall far enough that the massive resource crunch we're facing won't be an issue. #makingmisanthropyworkforyou
 
India is ****ed.
They are becoming increasingly more right wing as attributed to their elected politicians and racist sympathizers with what’s occurring in Kashmir. Its just a really ugly political landscape over there.

They are using their issues with Pakistan as a front to demonize Indian sheikhs and frighteningly becoming Israeli sympathizers as they see the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank as similar to their issues with Pakistan.

They are in no way similar or even relevant but that’s India for you in 2019
 
There’s reports he was taking a heap of uppers like meth and coke, and was also taking downers like opioids and benzos. Pretty much the diet of a Hollywood movie star.

Eukodal, look it up.
 
India is f’ed.
They are becoming increasingly more right wing as attributed to their elected politicians and racist sympathizers with what’s occurring in Kashmir. Its just a really ugly political landscape over there.

They are using their issues with Pakistan as a front to demonize Indian sheikhs and frighteningly becoming Israeli sympathizers as they see the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank as similar to their issues with Pakistan.

They are in no way similar or even relevant but that’s India for you in 2019

Oh yeah, Hindu fascism is on the rise.
 
India is f’ed.
They are becoming increasingly more right wing as attributed to their elected politicians and racist sympathizers with what’s occurring in Kashmir. Its just a really ugly political landscape over there.

They are using their issues with Pakistan as a front to demonize Indian sheikhs and frighteningly becoming Israeli sympathizers as they see the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank as similar to their issues with Pakistan.

They are in no way similar or even relevant but that’s India for you in 2019

Hindutva campaigners are ruining everything for everyone.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Beat me to it.

Old-school oxy.

And as Val mentioned earlier, meth in the form of 'Pervitin'.

Dude was peaking.

Someone wrote a book on it recently.

Goering was a morphine addict as well.
 
Oh yeah, Hindu fascism is on the rise.
Hindutva campaigners are ruining everything for everyone.
Usually those nations who have a history of colonial invasion, much like what India went through with Britain - would sympathize with others who suffered a similar plight.
South Africa’s solidarity with Palestine over apartheid being an obvious one.

Kashmir will be ground zero soon enough if the current trend continues
 
Someone wrote a book on it recently.

Goering was a morphine addict as well.

Yep, big time. If you're to believe the stories, he was even nicknamed 'Moring' by those who knew him.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yep, big time. If you're to believe the stories, he was even nicknamed 'Moring' by those who knew him.

To be fair, in that time, lots of average punters were addicts and got their gear from the chemist.
 
To be fair, in that time, lots of average punters were addicts and got their gear from the chemist.

".........combined amphetamine production for civilian use by SKF and Clark & Clark in late 1945 must have stood between 13 million and 55 million tablets monthly and may be conservatively estimated at about 30 million tablets monthly, each containing 5 to 10 mg of amphetamine salts.This national (civilian) consumption rate for the United States in 1945 was sufficient to supply half a million Americans with 2 tablets daily, the standard dosage schedule for depression and weight loss. Past-year use in 1946 would have almost certainly been higher, because many were only occasional users." - “Untitled Quarterly Royalty Reports”; Rasmussen, On Speed, chap 4; SKF v Clark & Clark, Records of Case No. C-2311 (1943), US District Court, New Jersey, US National Archives Administration.

".........According to FDA manufacturer surveys, by 1962, US production reached an estimated 80000 kg of amphetamine salts, corresponding to consumption of 43 standard 10-mg doses per person per year on a total-population basis.Thus, in amphetamine alone, the United States in the early 1960s was using nearly as much psychotropic medication as the 65 doses per person per year in the present decade that social critics today find so extraordinary." - Senate Subcommittee on Health, Hearing on Control of Psychotoxic Drugs (S. 2628), 88th Cong, 2nd Sess, August 3, 1964:21–37; Historical National Population Estimates.
 
".........combined amphetamine production for civilian use by SKF and Clark & Clark in late 1945 must have stood between 13 million and 55 million tablets monthly and may be conservatively estimated at about 30 million tablets monthly, each containing 5 to 10 mg of amphetamine salts.This national (civilian) consumption rate for the United States in 1945 was sufficient to supply half a million Americans with 2 tablets daily, the standard dosage schedule for depression and weight loss. Past-year use in 1946 would have almost certainly been higher, because many were only occasional users." - “Untitled Quarterly Royalty Reports”; Rasmussen, On Speed, chap 4; SKF v Clark & Clark, Records of Case No. C-2311 (1943), US District Court, New Jersey, US National Archives Administration.

".........According to FDA manufacturer surveys, by 1962, US production reached an estimated 80000 kg of amphetamine salts, corresponding to consumption of 43 standard 10-mg doses per person per year on a total-population basis.Thus, in amphetamine alone, the United States in the early 1960s was using nearly as much psychotropic medication as the 65 doses per person per year in the present decade that social critics today find so extraordinary." - Senate Subcommittee on Health, Hearing on Control of Psychotoxic Drugs (S. 2628), 88th Cong, 2nd Sess, August 3, 1964:21–37; Historical National Population Estimates.

Mot only that but heroin was legal in Australia til the 50 and in Britain until the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act

The Hon. Stanley Lee Jones states on the website of the Foundation:

If heroin were legal today, as it was in 1953, society would not have a drug problem. I talked to a former member for Monaro who was a chemist and who dispensed heroin in the 1950s. He said he had no problems with his customers when heroin was legal. In those days 70 per cent of crime was not associated with drug prohibition: It did not exist because heroin was legal. The problems began only when heroin became illegal and a criminal fraternity developed around its sale, as occurred during the prohibition era of the 1930s when criminals made money by selling illegal alcohol. When there is a profit motive involved people will push any illegal substance. That is the key problem: If there were no profit motive there would be no incentive to push drugs on the streets of Cabramatta or anywhere else. When people finally realise that they will find a solution to the drug problem.
 
India is f’ed.
They are becoming increasingly more right wing as attributed to their elected politicians and racist sympathizers with what’s occurring in Kashmir. Its just a really ugly political landscape over there.

They are using their issues with Pakistan as a front to demonize Indian sheikhs and frighteningly becoming Israeli sympathizers as they see the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank as similar to their issues with Pakistan.

They are in no way similar or even relevant but that’s India for you in 2019

India only really have a problem with Muslims. They’re moving away from the secular political system instigated by Ghandhi and through Modi are headed for the type of setup Savarkar was pushing. It would be a step backwards considering how far India has come over the last 70 years or so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top