Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2013
- Posts
- 81,024
- Reaction score
- 153,208
- Location
- Arden Street Hill
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
See, you're engaging in the same behaviour you criticise, ignoring reliability of a source of it sounds right to you.
I'm of the opinion that the 97 number that's been bandied about is a political and marketing tool used to encourage taking action on climate change.
I'm also of the opinion that even at a lower band of 80% that's still a pretty good consensus of experts.
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
I know you've made your mind up and I've also decided which kind of world I want to raise my family in but think before you criticise sources that you don't agree with when your own sources in return are even less credible- you end up sounding like a dishonest troll being contrarian for the sake of it.
1) The data. Do you have anything about "the data"?
2) "Consensus" is consistently abused by non scientific interests.
I know you've made your mind up and I've also decided which kind of world I want to raise my family in but think before you criticise sources that you don't agree with when your own sources in return are even less credible- you end up sounding like a dishonest troll being contrarian for the sake of it.
Here's the thing, I haven't, you have!





