Play Nice Random Chat Thread V

[Snake_Baker]

News just in, boys are more honest than girls.

It's no surprise that males are more merit oriented and females are more inclusive. This trait combined with the greater female attainment of political power, is a major driving force behind wokesterism. If you want a world where everyone "feelz" better, then carry on, but if you want a world where things actually get better, then it needs correcting.



..........we might all be living in grass huts, but at least no one's feelings would be hurt.

 

[DesertRoo]

News just in, boys are more honest than girls.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Well, it's bait for idiots that can't handle truth.

Surely you acknowledge that there are general fundamental differences in the sexes?

 

[Val Keating]

News just in, boys are more honest than girls.

Lol something must change when they grow up because they definitely be giving more “stickers” to the dudes with better houses.

 

[DesertRoo]

Well, it's bait for idiots that can't handle truth.

Surely you acknowledge that there are general fundamental differences in the sexes?

When a behavioural scientist
Who specialise on Social Cognition, Politics, Morality and Bias. Posts a trigger subject maybe there’s a ulterior motive?

This is from her page..
In the moral domain, my research has found that desires to blame and punish others underlie belief in human free will. Augmenting this belief and attributing free will to harm doers serves as a justification that enables people to bring punitive harm upon their fellow human beings with minimal psychological distress.

In the political domain, I have argued that in-group biases likely evolved as a natural feature of human psychology and that all human social groups are susceptible to bias. My work has found that both liberals and conservatives in the U.S. are prone to political bias and to virtually identical degrees.

its bait... it’s not studying kids, it’s how people react.

 

[Tectonic]

My work has found that both liberals and conservatives in the U.S. are prone to political bias and to virtually identical degrees.

Groundbreaking stuff here

 

[DesertRoo]

Groundbreaking stuff here

Probably got a couple of million dollar grant to prove it too...

 

[Snake_Baker]

Lol something must change when they grow up because they definitely be giving more “stickers” to the dudes with better houses.

It's definitely paradoxical.

Group = egalitarian.
Individually = To hell with effort, I am waiting at the finish line to check out the winners.

..........and evolution marches on...............

 

[Snake_Baker]

When a behavioural scientist
Who specialise on Social Cognition, Politics, Morality and Bias. Posts a trigger subject maybe there’s a ulterior motive?

Isn't there always?

This is from her page..
In the moral domain, my research has found that desires to blame and punish others underlie belief in human free will.

This is reminiscent of postmodernist gobbledygook. What does it even mean, and where is the connection?

Of course making judgements are a factor of human free will, in fact IT IS human free will.

Augmenting this belief and attributing free will to harm doers serves as a justification that enables people to bring punitive harm upon their fellow human beings with minimal psychological distress.

In the political domain, I have argued that in-group biases likely evolved as a natural feature of human psychology and that all human social groups are susceptible to bias. My work has found that both liberals and conservatives in the U.S. are prone to political bias and to virtually identical degrees.

This is a classical ploy of the contemporary "social" academic, they take some generally agreed human traits, then cram them with word salad to make them appear intellectual, and then twist it around until it suits their socio-political agenda.

Intellectual imposterism 101.

My work has found that both liberals and conservatives in the U.S. are prone to political bias and to virtually identical degrees.

This has been widely acknowledged decades before her "work".

its bait... it’s not studying kids, it’s how people react.

Kids are actually people, y'know.

 

[DesertRoo]

Isn't there always?



This is reminiscent of postmodernist gobbledygook. What does it even mean, and where is the connection?

Of course making judgements are a factor of human free will, in fact IT IS human free will.



This is a classical ploy of the contemporary "social" academic, they take some generally agreed human traits, then cram them with word salad to make them appear intellectual, and then twist it around until it suits their socio-political agenda.

Intellectual imposterism 101.



This has been widely acknowledged decades before her "work".



Kids are actually people, y'know.

She’s just a closet anarchist and doesn’t even know it yet...

 

[Snake_Baker]

She’s just a closet anarchist and doesn’t even know it yet...

I think she's just another academic impostor.

I mean............

In the political domain, I have argued that in-group biases likely evolved as a natural feature of human psychology and that all human social groups are susceptible to bias

.....is not exactly a riveting conclusion.

Here's a great piss take of the postmodernist dance thesis:

 

[Tas]

Hehe, I just found it amusing, perhaps I am easily amused. I wouldn't give that drawing on the left any stickers, not at 4, 40 or 100 years of age.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Hehe, I just found it amusing, perhaps I am easily amused. I wouldn't give that drawing on the left any stickers, not at 4, 40 or 100 years of age.

Fascist!!!!

 

[DesertRoo]

I think she's just another academic impostor.

I mean............

In the political domain, I have argued that in-group biases likely evolved as a natural feature of human psychology and that all human social groups are susceptible to bias

.....is not exactly a riveting conclusion.

Here's a great piss take of the postmodernist dance thesis:

Wtf did I just watch...

but sometimes the conclusion isn’t that important, she might’ve set off believing one thing to be true and inevitably coming to the boring conclusion.
What’s key is she learns from her research. You can’t knock the individual on their journey.

but going back to the original post, certainly will be interesting if the reaction is split down political lines.

 

[Dan]

 

[Val Keating]

Question,

On Twitter, why don’t people just reply to tweets but instead quote tweets with a reply? Is it just for attention?

 

[SpiderBurton22]

Question,

On Twitter, why don’t people just reply to tweets but instead quote tweets with a reply? Is it just for attention?

Is it so all your followers can see it?

 

[see see]

Question,

On Twitter, why don’t people just reply to tweets but instead quote tweets with a reply? Is it just for attention?

No. Quoting your own Tweets on BigFooty is the go to move for attention whores.

 

[Tectonic]

Is 87 too old to be a senator?

 

[Snake_Baker]

 

[Val Keating]

Is it so all your followers can see it?

Maybe. Can’t they see it if you just comment? Heaps of people do it and I just wonder if they want to have a conversation with someone why not just comment? Has to be something to do with quote tweets get more attention with the algorithm.

 

[see see]

View attachment 1067739

Interesting. I didn't know that basements had lawns.

 

[koshari]

Interesting. I didn't know that basements had lawns.

I never knew CC mowed.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Interesting. I didn't know that basements had lawns.

Be quiet or I'll put you back in the chest.

 

[Val Keating]

After A Current Affair ran a story about a neo nazi group last night, one of them turned up to channel 9 this morning and belted their security guard.