Play Nice Random Chat Thread V

[Snake_Baker]

What qualifies this bloke as "neo-Nazi", or should I just accept that as fact because "A Current Affair" makes this claim?

 

[Ry009]

Well one way to prove you're unfairly done by is attacking someone unprovoked....

 

[Swallow_Wood]

What qualifies this bloke as "neo-Nazi", or should I just accept that as fact because "A Current Affair" makes this claim?

5 miutes of research online will confirm their claims. Unless MSM and big tech are collaborating to discredit some random thug just cos.

 

[Snake_Baker]

5 miutes of research online will confirm their claims. Unless MSM and big tech are collaborating to discredit some random thug just cos.

That's not an answer.

 

[Swallow_Wood]

That's not an answer.

Answer your own question mate. You have the tools.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Answer your own question mate. You have the tools.

Why are you being defensive? Why can't you justify this categorisation intelligently?

Outline to me how this person qualifies as a neo-Nazi? If it's just a matter of implied fact, then it should be a very simple exercise for you to do this.

 

[Snake_Baker]

 

[koshari]

What qualifies this bloke as "neo-Nazi", or should I just accept that as fact because "A Current Affair" makes this claim?

He is an "alleged" neo nazi if you read the post, so no qualifying requirements, like some of the terms you like to use to catagorise others.

 

[Val Keating]

What qualifies this bloke as "neo-Nazi", or should I just accept that as fact because "A Current Affair" makes this claim?

I was wondering the same thing. He’s a kiwi and part of the ‘Lads Society’. Tried to recruit that scumbag that shot up the mosque in NZ.

Lads Society - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Snake_Baker]

He is an "alleged" neo nazi if you read the post, so no qualifying requirements, like some of the terms you like to use to catagorise others.

Another defensive deflection response from a card carrying member of the collective mindset.

Why do have the need to insert yourself and railroad this when I ask someone else to define their position? What business is this of yours?

I was wondering the same thing. He’s a kiwi and part of the ‘Lads Society’. Tried to recruit that scumbag that shot up the mosque in NZ.

Lads Society - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

How does this qualify him as a neo nazi? I want your analysis of this.

 

[DesertRoo]

What qualifies this bloke as "neo-Nazi", or should I just accept that as fact because "A Current Affair" makes this claim?

Doesn’t he self proclaim to be a member of a nationalist socialist organisation and not being from Germany or a member of the nazi party. I would’ve thought that apt neo- at the front is the correct definition.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Doesn’t he claim to be a member of a nationalist socialist organisation and not being from Germany or a member of the nazi party. I would’ve thought that neo- at the front is apt definition.

Does he?

 

[Snake_Baker]

See, this is not an exercise in neo nazis, it's actually an exercise in the effect of tabloid media on the gullibility and/or pre existing biases that lead to people being very poor thinkers on occasions.

I wouldn't believe a ****ing thing that "A Current Affair" told me without thoroughly investigating the matter myself.

The bloke could be a neo nazi for all I know, but I am not taking that as implied fact based on what has been tabled.

 

[koshari]

Another defensive deflection response from a card carrying member of the collective mindset.

And almost on cue another pigeon holing example of generalising.



but since you insist, the dictionary definition would suggest the author believes they are a member of some organisation similar to the german nazi party. seriously though the definition very much pivots on how one could define that said organisation is similar to the german nazi party,
Do they meet in a hall?
Do they charge a membership?
By these simple observations our historic car club could be defined as similar to the German Nazi Party so therefore by very lose definition you could call our car club members "neo nazis"

But we are all a little bit more intelligent than to accept this that so we accept the statement was a generilism.

neo-Nazi
/niːə(ʊ)ˈnɑːtsi/

noun
noun: neo-Nazi; plural noun: neo-Nazis

1. a member of an organization similar to the German Nazi Party.
   
   
   
   

 

[Tectonic]

You pick some real weird hills to fight on

 

[Snake_Baker]

And almost on cue another pigeon holing example of generalising.

but since you insist, the dictionary definition would suggest the author believes they are a member of some organisation similar to the german nazi party. seriously though the definition very much pivots on how one could define that said organisation is similar to the german nazi party,
Do they meet in a hall?
Do they charge a membership?
By these simple observations our historic car club could be defined as similar to the German Nazi Party so therefore by very lose definition you could call our car club members "neo nazis"

But we are all a little bit more intelligent than to accept this that so we accept the statement was a generilism.

neo-Nazi
/niːə(ʊ)ˈnɑːtsi/

noun
noun: neo-Nazi; plural noun: neo-Nazis

1. a member of an organization similar to the German Nazi Party.

Okay, conduct yourself like the second part of your response more often and I will start assigning credibility to your opinions.

The man IS NOT a neo-Nazi!!!!!

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

After A Current Affair ran a story about a neo nazi group last night, one of them turned up to channel 9 this morning and belted their security guard.

Cowardly campaigner. Those types don’t like media exposure.

 

[DesertRoo]

Does he?

Yeah he does, but I would put him in the same category as John Sullivan, as a provocateur,
unless the dude has a severe mental impairment, it was to perfect a scenario..

 

[Tectonic]

The bloke could be a neo nazi

The man IS NOT a neo-Nazi!!!!!

The duality of man

 

[Snake_Baker]

Cowardly campaigner. Those types don’t like media exposure.

Here's anotrher bizarre one that pops up.

What's "cowardly" about confronting a man one on one? It actually takes courage to do that.

I mean, he's possibly an arseh*le, sure, but a coward?

 

[koshari]

"Why do have the need to insert yourself and railroad this when I ask someone else to define their position? What business is this of yours? "

My apologies, i thought i was posting in the "random chat thread" rather than the "Tef and Desert Roo" PM thread.

Sarcasm aside,

The actual answer is that it is because you post a lot of rubbish at times of which some is just crying out for rebuttel.

 

[koshari]

The duality of man

both statements cannot exist in a logical arguement.

 

[Swallow_Wood]

Why are you being defensive? Why can't you justify this categorisation intelligently?

Outline to me how this person qualifies as a neo-Nazi? If it's just a matter of implied fact, then it should be a very simple exercise for you to do this.

I did do it.

Now you do it too.

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Here's anotrher bizarre one that pops up.

What's "cowardly" about confronting a man one on one? It actually takes courage to do that.

I mean, he's possibly an arseh*le, sure, but a coward?

The dude had at least 20+kg on his ‘opponent’. Was in very little danger of losing that fight.

 

[Zondor]

Neo-Nazi leader films himself bashing Channel Nine security guard

National Socialist Network leader Thomas Sewell posted footage of himself punching a Channel Nine security guard to the ground as he and a follower stormed the station's Melbourne offfice.

www.dailymail.co.uk

For those who have not seen the incident the clip is in this link. :stern look